LogFAQs > #946538829

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

I'm sure everyone had an understanding of why people were being rounded up the previous times as well. The issue was whether everyone agreed with it.

Do you disagree that keeping people in camps for their two-week isolation period is going to be more effective than simply telling them to isolate and hoping they listen? Do you disagree that an isolation period for anyone entering a region (especially one with no ongoing community spread) is a reasonable and effective way to prevent further outbreaks? Do you disagree that the experience is going to be pretty much the same for the responsible, law-abiding people (presuming reasonable living conditions) as if they were left to isolate voluntarily, meaning the only people adversely affected are the non-compliant people who would need to be taken into custody anyway?

To say nothing of the fact that my statement was in response to you saying that people running these camps are not always upfront about their rationales, which the universal understanding of the rationale here does completely rebut and moving on to questions of agreement is very much moving the goalposts.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.