LogFAQs > #943425402

A system were fraud doesn't exist and when it does exist we have ways to systematically uncover it.

200 million people voting and 1000 being fraud which turns the election is no better than 2 million voting and 0 being fraud.

In fact, it is arguably worse.

The fact you are okay with fraud and it's possible expansion because you are so against putting in a system to stamp out fraud is kind of concerning to me. They again, are not mutually exclusive.

When you are arguing all ballots should go to a less secure method of voting with no ways to stamp down on fraud that could be used, you are arguing a self-serving argument.