LogFAQs > #939863876

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicHow more longer would WW2 have lasted?
JBaLLEN66
05/28/20 11:03:12 PM
#25:


UnfairRepresent posted...
Ehh

Doubtful.

I mean history would be different sure but there was no realistic way Germany was winning that fight.

I don't have the exact quote a famous historian said something along the lines of "Germany's plans hinged on absolutely everything that could go right, going right for them and everything that could go wrong for the enemies going wrong."

Trying to take the UK was a hassle, Trying to take Africa was a hassle, Trying to protect Italy was a hassle, trying to maintain what land they did take was a hassle, supply shortages were a hassle.

Throw in the notions of the US or Russia being impossible for Germany to take... they were kind of fucked even without Hitler's incompotence.

It's all cold war propaganda. During the COLD WAR, Americans consulted with former nazi generals on their combat experience against the Russians because they might have had to face them in a WAR and the generals just through Hitler under the bus because the dude was dead and nobody likes to blame themselves for losing like every other loser in history. I'm sure anything from the Soviet Union was credible due to an ongoing COLD WAR

---
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdR2Iktffaw
The day Capitalism was humiliated :)
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1