LogFAQs > #939046915

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	DA rules Ahmaud Arbery Killing JUSTIFIED, now asks FEDERAL GOV'T to take over!!!
Kyuubi4269 05/12/20 4:41:38 PM #125:	LinkPizza posted... No. They weren't. They aren't cops, so that means he had no reason to believe they were performing a citizen's arrest. Especially since it's a very abnormal thing to happen. Even if they said they were performing one (which they might not have said), there was no reason for him to believe that. Most people wouldn't. Most people would probably think it was a ploy to get someone to come closer for whatever reason (like a mugging, or killing, for example). His perspective isn't relevant for the hillbillies' perspective, they aren't able to reas his mind and the law doesn't expect him to. LinkPizza posted... So, while he was justified, they were not. Especially since I don't think they were actually at the crime scene, were they? I just don't remember it saying anything like that in the articles I saw. But I don't really remember where he was in relation to the "crime scene". No, they both acted legally off what the percieved. Change your laws if you don't like it. He was jogging away when he was informed of the house invasion, that's good reason to believe he was running from the crime scene. LinkPizza posted... Except you still might get shot. If it's a police, I'd feel fine complying. But a random person with a gun? I feel like they'll shoot me either way. As it happens a lot where I'm from. Then where you're from is a shithole that trains people to act erratically. That doesn't mean the law doesn't protect citizens arrest. LinkPizza posted... They shouldn't have even used guns in the first place. That's escalating the situation. If they didn't think they could handle him without guns, they should have called the cops. We're not dealing in shoulds and should nots, we're dealing in cans and cannots. They can perform a citizens arrest and they can bring a gun to protect themselves. LinkPizza posted... Just look at what's happening. It looks like they're trying to let killers go scot free. That is how self-defense law works. It's how you're allowed to kill in the military. If a killing is legal, there is no punishment. LinkPizza posted... And it's probably because they're cop buddies who watch out for each other. Prove it, otherwise it's slander. LinkPizza posted... The law is written so loosely that they could easily prosecute thees guys. But instead, they use the loosely written law to protect them instead. You keep saying the law is solid, but it's the exact opposite. It so flexible, they can bend the law to do whatever they want. It's not flexible, it's lax. It means you could kill me the same way in self-defense and you would also get away with it. It has a wide catch net with a sharp edge, a good lawyer knows how to get their client comfortably in the centre. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:939046915] in DA rules A... [t:78677171]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>No. They weren't. They aren't cops, so that means he had no reason to believe they were performing a citizen's arrest. Especially since it's a very abnormal thing to happen. Even if they said they were performing one (which they might not have said), there was no reason for him to believe that. Most people wouldn't. Most people would probably think it was a ploy to get someone to come closer for whatever reason (like a mugging, or killing, for example). </quote> His perspective isn't relevant for the hillbillies' perspective, they aren't able to reas his mind and the law doesn't expect him to. LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>So, while he was justified, they were not. Especially since I don't think they were actually at the crime scene, were they? I just don't remember it saying anything like that in the articles I saw. But I don't really remember where he was in relation to the "crime scene".</quote> No, they both acted legally off what the percieved. Change your laws if you don't like it. He was jogging away when he was informed of the house invasion, that's good reason to believe he was running from the crime scene. LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>Except you still might get shot. If it's a police, I'd feel fine complying. But a random person with a gun? I feel like they'll shoot me either way. As it happens a lot where I'm from.</quote> Then where you're from is a shithole that trains people to act erratically. That doesn't mean the law doesn't protect citizens arrest. LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>They shouldn't have even used guns in the first place. That's escalating the situation. If they didn't think they could handle him without guns, they should have called the cops.</quote> We're not dealing in shoulds and should nots, we're dealing in cans and cannots. They can perform a citizens arrest and they can bring a gun to protect themselves. LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>Just look at what's happening. It looks like they're trying to let killers go scot free. </quote> That is how self-defense law works. It's how you're allowed to kill in the military. If a killing is legal, there is no punishment. LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>And it's probably because they're cop buddies who watch out for each other. </quote> Prove it, otherwise it's slander. LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>The law is written so loosely that they could easily prosecute thees guys. But instead, they use the loosely written law to protect them instead. You keep saying the law is solid, but it's the exact opposite. It so flexible, they can bend the law to do whatever they want.</quote> It's not flexible, it's lax. It means you could kill me the same way in self-defense and you would also get away with it. It has a wide catch net with a sharp edge, a good lawyer knows how to get their client comfortably in the centre. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1