Topic List | Page List: 1 |
---|---|
Topic | Coronavirus Topic 4: Oblivion |
Corrik7 03/20/20 1:25:11 PM #156: | Wanglicious posted... you're right. though for what it's worth, i wasn't basing the 20-44 age group being the 2nd worst for hospitalizations based on the chart, it was from this bit:That's not what that means, Wang. They are using a sample size. For example, let me explain this in this way. The brackets are 1-19 20-44 45-54 55-64 65-84 85+ Let's take million cases 1-19 1000 cases 20-44 625,000 cases 45-54 199,000 cases 55-64 100,000 cases 65-84 50,000 cases 85+ 25,000 cases If the hospitalization is 1-19 3% 20-44 6% 45-54 10% 54-64 15% 65-84 25% 85% 50% This gives you raw hospitalizations of 1-19 30 cases 20-44 37,500 cases 45-54 19,900 cases 55-64 15,000 65-84 12,500 85+ 12,500 Now you breakdown the % of age groups hospitalized of total Total hospitalizations 97,430 hospitalizations 1-19 3/total = negligible 20-44 37500/total = 38.85% 45-54 19,900/total = 20.42% 55-64 15,000/total = 15.4% 65-84 12500/total = 12.83% 85+ 12500/total = 12.83% You have to take the population of the age brackets into account. Saying nearly 40% of hospitalizations are 20-44 is clickbait titles. Sure. It can be true. But, it isn't explaining why that is and is preying on fear to get that click. 40% of hospitalizations are 20-44 but only 6% of them get hospitalized. They just have more numbers to draw from. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) ... Copied to Clipboard! |
Topic List | Page List: 1 |