LogFAQs > #926161357

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 235: Autopsy-Turvy
xp1337 08/16/19 7:18:16 PM #33:	Bullock not running for Senate is unfortunate and is a blow for retaking the Senate, yeah. But I'm not sure how it gets you from 1% -> 0%! Assuming you have CO, AZ, and ME flipping with AL negating one. Is NC/IA really that much worse a position to be in than MT? I know Bullock was uniquely good for running there but I feel if losing the chance at MT was what brought you to 0 - with the implication nowhere else was in play already - you should have been there already! Personally I think it's still alive. Very much uphill, yes, but not zero. Definitely an annoyingly high chance it falls short at 49-51. --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out? <cite>xp1337 posted [p:926161357] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Bullock not running for Senate is unfortunate and is a blow for retaking the Senate, yeah. But I'm not sure how it gets you from 1% -> 0%! Assuming you have CO, AZ, and ME flipping with AL negating one. Is NC/IA really that much worse a position to be in than MT? I know Bullock was uniquely good for running there but I feel if losing the chance at MT was what brought you to 0 - with the implication nowhere else was in play already - you should have been there already! Personally I think it's still alive. Very much uphill, yes, but not zero. Definitely an annoyingly high chance it falls short at 49-51. --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1