LogFAQs > #925610537

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicNFL Discussion Topic
Reg
08/04/19 2:14:36 PM
#14:


Aecioo posted...
Hes 100% correct. In this day and age you dont need a top rb to be a successful team. Yes, Zeke makes them better, that's obvious. But rb is the least important position in the NFL right now (please dont come at me with LONG SNAPPER or something you know what I'm saying).

You may be correct in general. However
Emeraldegg posted...
Not to mention teams that are set up like dallas is DO actually need a star RB to win a super bowl. Dak imo is good, but he is not that type of qb who can carry you, nor do they have the receiving corps to do so either. They are built to run the ball, so it's just asinine to call out zeke like this.

This post is absolutely and 100% correct when applied to the Cowboys specifically

Just look at how shit the team was when Zeke was suspended for six games a couple years back.

A generic NFL team can be successful and win a Super Bowl without a top RB. The Dallas Cowboys as they are currently built cannot.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1