LogFAQs > #925610065

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	NFL Discussion Topic
Emeraldegg 08/04/19 2:03:02 PM #11:	davidponte posted... While the "you don't need a star RB/WR to win a super bowl" argument is technically true if we look at the last 20 years or so of super bowls, it's kind of a skewed stat because the Patriots have been involved in a lot of them and they do things differently than every other team in the league. Not to mention teams that are set up like dallas is DO actually need a star RB to win a super bowl. Dak imo is good, but he is not that type of qb who can carry you, nor do they have the receiving corps to do so either. They are built to run the ball, so it's just asinine to call out zeke like this. --- I'm a greener egg than the eggs from dr. seuss <cite>Emeraldegg posted [p:925610065] in NFL Discus... [t:77914206]...</cite> <quote>davidponte posted...</cite> <quote>While the "you don't need a star RB/WR to win a super bowl" argument is technically true if we look at the last 20 years or so of super bowls, it's kind of a skewed stat because the Patriots have been involved in a lot of them and they do things differently than every other team in the league.</quote> Not to mention teams that are set up like dallas is DO actually need a star RB to win a super bowl. Dak imo is good, but he is not that type of qb who can carry you, nor do they have the receiving corps to do so either. They are built to run the ball, so it's just asinine to call out zeke like this. --- I'm a greener egg than the eggs from dr. seuss</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1