LogFAQs > #910491287

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Mexican Trump Supporter who wishes she was WHITE causes OUTRAGE in Florida!!!
Zeus 10/14/18 12:17:41 AM #35:	Zero_Maniac posted... Wrong. Feel free to look it up. It's a lot more than you seem to think. Zero_Maniac posted... No, it's both. Ethnicity is a subset of race, by the way. Cars and trucks are both automobiles, but cars aren't trucks. The idea that it's really all just the same is patently false. You're going to have pretty extreme variations based on ethnicity, which is why race is a terrible categorization outside of appearance. Zero_Maniac posted... No it's not. You can keep drinking your progressive kool aid if you like, but I prefer to live in reality. The data shows that you are wrong. You don't understand the data or its significance. And this isn't a matter of "progressive beliefs," it's a matter of fact. Ethnicity imparts a lot of information whereas race obscures information. Zero_Maniac posted... That's not what I did. I don't care if you call me racist. Plenty of people would consider me to be a racist based on what I said in that previous post, and that's fine. I just want to let you know that I'm not in favor of authoritarian regimes or sending people to gas chambers. Good to know? It's a little weird that you feel like you specifically have to say something like that, especially when nobody has accused you of such. Zero_Maniac posted... Anthropologists can determine whether someone is (or is approximately, in the case of mixed race individuals) caucasoid, negroid, mongoloid, etc based on the shape of their skull or other features. To deny the differences between the races is to deny anthropologists their field. We also know that ethnicities within a given race have similar characteristics beyond just appearance on average, and I'd be interested in any evidence you have to the contrary. ...which is still based on looks. And it's funny that you talk about denying anthropologists their field. Are you also going to object to people who denied phrenologists their field? =p --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:910491287] in Mexican Tr... [t:77080367]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zero_Maniac posted...</cite> <quote>Wrong.</quote> Feel free to look it up. It's a lot more than you seem to think. <cite>Zero_Maniac posted...</cite> <quote>No, it's both. Ethnicity is a subset of race, by the way.</quote> Cars and trucks are both automobiles, but cars aren't trucks. The idea that it's really all just the same is patently false. You're going to have pretty extreme variations based on ethnicity, which is why race is a terrible categorization outside of appearance. <cite>Zero_Maniac posted...</cite> <quote>No it's not. You can keep drinking your progressive kool aid if you like, but I prefer to live in reality. The data shows that you are wrong.</quote> You don't understand the data or its significance. And this isn't a matter of "progressive beliefs," it's a matter of fact. Ethnicity imparts a lot of information whereas race obscures information. <cite>Zero_Maniac posted...</cite> <quote>That's not what I did. I don't care if you call me racist. Plenty of people would consider me to be a racist based on what I said in that previous post, and that's fine. I just want to let you know that I'm not in favor of authoritarian regimes or sending people to gas chambers. </quote> Good to know? It's a little weird that you feel like you specifically have to say something like that, especially when nobody has accused you of such. <cite>Zero_Maniac posted...</cite> <quote>Anthropologists can determine whether someone is (or is approximately, in the case of mixed race individuals) caucasoid, negroid, mongoloid, etc based on the shape of their skull or other features. To deny the differences between the races is to deny anthropologists their field. We also know that ethnicities within a given race have similar characteristics beyond just appearance on average, and I'd be interested in any evidence you have to the contrary.</quote> ...which is still based on looks. And it's funny that you talk about denying anthropologists their field. Are you also going to object to people who denied phrenologists their field? =p --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1