LogFAQs > #903217041

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Only 26% of Americans believe Kim Jung Un will DISARM HIS NUKES!! Do you???
Zeus 06/14/18 1:34:39 AM #21:	streamofthesky posted... Unless Kim wants the "Libya solution" that professional idiot John Bolton offered NK, he's gonna hold onto the nukes. Again, I should point out that Libya disarmed long before the upheaval and the threat of nukes would have likely done little to stop the upheaval (other than possibly discouraging outsiders from provoking it) streamofthesky posted... Even if that's true, why would he give them up? Smarter to just act like he's being peaceful now, but insist on keeping the stockpile. He just won't do any testing now in return for some trade/relief. Then at least other countries can't be sure they don't work and he keeps the lie alive. Makes others think twice about taking military action against him. If we can convince him to discontinue further activity, that's a huge net win. TyVulpine posted... I'd trust Kim before I'd ever trust Trump. And I don't trust Kim any further than I can see him. SpeeDLeemon posted... This shit wouldn't happen for a decade or more anyway who cares This should be about him being a horrible dictator and not understanding human rights. One battle at a time. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:903217041] in Only 26% o... [t:76711170]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>Unless Kim wants the "Libya solution" that professional idiot John Bolton offered NK, he's gonna hold onto the nukes.</quote> Again, I should point out that Libya disarmed long before the upheaval and the threat of nukes would have likely done little to stop the upheaval (other than possibly discouraging outsiders from provoking it) <cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>Even if that's true, why would he give them up? Smarter to just act like he's being peaceful now, but insist on keeping the stockpile. He just won't do any testing now in return for some trade/relief. Then at least other countries can't be sure they don't work and he keeps the lie alive. Makes others think twice about taking military action against him.</quote> If we can convince him to discontinue further activity, that's a huge net win. <cite>TyVulpine posted...</cite> <quote>I'd trust Kim before I'd ever trust Trump. And I don't trust Kim any further than I can see him.</quote> <cite>SpeeDLeemon posted...</cite> <quote>This shit wouldn't happen for a decade or more anyway who cares This should be about him being a horrible dictator and not understanding human rights.</quote> One battle at a time. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1