LogFAQs > #903210246

adjl posted...

That's still not a reason to harass somebody. Or it is technically a reason, but it's not a justification.

It's both a reason and a justification. It's just not one that you find pleasing to your sensibilities.

adjl posted...

Harassing somebody who has no power to change what you're mad about is idiotic and unjustifiable, and I'm baffled that you would even consider defending it.

I'm defending the right to criticize professionals, which you either feel people lack or should lack.

Meanwhile, you somehow think actors have less say than a kid working the register at a Taco Bell. The whole, "Well, it's policy, sir!", argument rings flat in context.

DrYuya posted...

Hell, pay me 1/10th of what even the newer actors made for Force Awakens and/or TLJ

I'll gladly put a laser cannon on my eyes for digging out prison tunnels in Micheal Bays gritty sci fi remake of Shawshank Redemption.

Will I care about the internet guy who's crying buckets of salt from his mangina about the death of modern movies? Not so much.

Yeah, especially since I get hounded by Mead without the benefit of a massive contract that carries royalties and some merchandising possibilities. I'd happily trade places with these kids (although maybe not for a tenth, but certainly half or a quarter)
---

(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.