LogFAQs > #899475223

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Just watched Logan for the second time. How do you rate it?
AeroFlash15 04/11/18 2:56:58 PM #21:	UnfairRepresent posted... 4/10 Mediocre, plot hole filled. It's a string of cliches and stories we've all heard before, but people give it a pass solely because it is grim and dark. Stewart and Jackman are acting their socks off I'll grant you but it doesn't change the fact that the material is paper-thin. It's sadly a testament to how you can sell anything to kids just by going "IT's not for kids, look how edgy it is!" See: Hatred I thought Hatred was ill-received because it was edgy. As for the rest of your post, eh, I can see what you're getting at. It's mostly the acting/characters that carry it, but reuse of cliches don't bring down material as long as the overall product is decently handled. It's hard to be original with anything nowadays. --- Never stop <cite>AeroFlash15 posted [p:899475223] in Just watch... [t:76505735]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>4/10 Mediocre, plot hole filled. It's a string of cliches and stories we've all heard before, but people give it a pass solely because it is grim and dark. Stewart and Jackman are acting their socks off I'll grant you but it doesn't change the fact that the material is paper-thin. It's sadly a testament to how you can sell anything to kids just by going "IT's not for kids, look how edgy it is!" See: Hatred</quote> I thought Hatred was ill-received because it was edgy. As for the rest of your post, eh, I can see what you're getting at. It's mostly the acting/characters that carry it, but reuse of cliches don't bring down material as long as the overall product is decently handled. It's hard to be original with anything nowadays. --- Never stop</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1