LogFAQs > #896149238

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 161: Elephants On Parade
Nelson_Mandela 02/15/18 3:54:56 PM #494:	Eddv posted... Nelson_Mandela posted... Jakyl25 posted... I dunno, it seems pretty clear to me that it means These are the only rules we are taking out of the hands of the states; if you want to restrict any others you need an Amendment. I'm no scholar, but I understand it to mean that Congress can make federal laws, and anything not under federal law defaults to the states. Your interpretation would imply that Congress is essentially not needed. Seriously go read about the Nullification crisis - this was hotly debated at one time. But to back sephg up a bit the 14th amendment was designed to end this debate. Just realized your history topic purged and I am saddened --- "A more mature answer than I expected."~ Jakyl25 "Sephy's point is right."~ Inviso <cite>Nelson_Mandela posted [p:896149238] in Politics C... [t:76294453]...</cite> <quote><cite>Eddv posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nelson_Mandela posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>I dunno, it seems pretty clear to me that it means These are the only rules we are taking out of the hands of the states; if you want to restrict any others you need an Amendment.</quote> I'm no scholar, but I understand it to mean that Congress can make federal laws, and anything not under federal law defaults to the states. Your interpretation would imply that Congress is essentially not needed.</quote> Seriously go read about the Nullification crisis - this was hotly debated at one time. But to back sephg up a bit the 14th amendment was designed to end this debate.</quote> Just realized your history topic purged and I am saddened --- "A more mature answer than I expected."~ Jakyl25 "Sephy's point is right."~ Inviso</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1