LogFAQs > #879662205

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why don't they just nuke ISIS?
adjl 05/23/17 2:28:14 PM #5:	Flame_Hazard posted... adjl posted... Because doing so would kill more innocent people than ISIS could in 20 years. 20 years is a lot of time. And they'll be lucky if they can manage more than a thousand civilian casualties a year. 20,000 civilian casualties is chump change for a nuke. Depending on where ISIS decides to hole up, 200,000 could be chump change for a nuke. One nuke. Nukes are **ing terrifying. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:879662205] in Why don't ... [t:75378388]...</cite> <quote><cite>Flame_Hazard posted...</cite> <quote><cite>adjl posted...</cite> <quote>Because doing so would kill more innocent people than ISIS could in 20 years.</quote> 20 years is a lot of time.</quote> And they'll be lucky if they can manage more than a thousand civilian casualties a year. 20,000 civilian casualties is chump change for a nuke. Depending on where ISIS decides to hole up, 200,000 could be chump change for a nuke. One nuke. Nukes are **ing terrifying. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1