LogFAQs > #871934402

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Lopen watches and talks about all the Royal Rumbles. And ranks them. TURBO.
Lopen 01/30/17 8:54:57 PM #138:	So far super predictable winners have been... 1990, 1991. 1994 kinda if you were metagaming the on PPV build, though the finish was weird and not one I'd imagine anyone predicting. 1995 given how weak the field was when you think about it kinda was too despite Michaels drawing #1. I feel like it's more of a recent development more than a long term thing-- less depth on the rosters = less viable winners. --- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love! <cite>Lopen posted [p:871934402] in Lopen watc... [t:74906931]...</cite> <quote>So far super predictable winners have been... 1990, 1991. 1994 kinda if you were metagaming the on PPV build, though the finish was weird and not one I'd imagine anyone predicting. 1995 given how weak the field was when you think about it kinda was too despite Michaels drawing #1. I feel like it's more of a recent development more than a long term thing-- less depth on the rosters = less viable winners. --- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1