LogFAQs > #961154281

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Louis CK has a new special called "Sorry" and here's a clip....
ArchNemo 12/23/21 11:23:20 AM #51:	Solid Snake07 posted... How was it not freely given? You can say he abused a power dynamic and I can say this was all 15+ years ago before CK was a household name and that he had little to any professional authority over these women. None of that really matters. One adult asked another adult if they could masturbate in front of them and they said yes. He may not have been a household name but he was still huge in the comedy circuits, so he'd still have power over younger female comedians. That said, I don't know what to think. Yeah it could be seen as an abuse of power but at the same time, should he be excluded from pursuing certain people just because he has influence? As long as there was no overt or implied threat of repercussion if they didn't consent, anyway. --- Down with the Signess. <cite>ArchNemo posted [p:961154281] in Louis CK h... [t:79817288]...</cite> <quote>Solid Snake07 posted... </cite> <quote>How was it not freely given? You can say he abused a power dynamic and I can say this was all 15+ years ago before CK was a household name and that he had little to any professional authority over these women. None of that really matters. One adult asked another adult if they could masturbate in front of them and they said yes.</quote> He may not have been a household name but he was still huge in the comedy circuits, so he'd still have power over younger female comedians. That said, I don't know what to think. Yeah it could be seen as an abuse of power but at the same time, should he be excluded from pursuing certain people just because he has influence? As long as there was no overt or implied threat of repercussion if they didn't consent, anyway. --- Down with the Signess.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1