LogFAQs > #953807142

BlackJackCat posted...

I never said they shouldn't have the option. Once again you people are putting words in my mouth that I never said. I'm saying you're not less scummy for having sex with a person in desperation for money. End of story. People will do what they will need to do to survive, and I'm not begrudging that, all I said is that consenting to do something you don't want to do is still not consent. How is that a hard concept to grasp?

Many people have jobs that they don't want to do, or portions of it that they hate etc. Child care workers may love working with kids/babies, but hate changing diapers etc.

You can give consent for things you don't want to do, wanting to do something has nothing at all to do with consent. If someone WANTS to make money and they can do it having sex, but they wouldn't normally have sex with that person if money was involved, they are still giving consent to have sex with them for money, and there is nothing wrong with that.

I personally try for jobs I WANT to do, and that pay me money. I would rather make less money making money doing something I enjoy or want to do, than more money doing something I don't like.

In a perfect world sex workers would ENJOY sex, and want to do it, but also get money for it as well so they can support themselves.

If men were offered the option to have sex for more (with the gender they prefer) many would jump on that. There are 100% for sure women who enjoy sex just as much as men, and have a high sex drive as well. Nothing wrong with them getting paid for something they love to do anyway.


---

Tacobot 3000 "Saving the world from not having tacos."
Friends don't make their friends die Hanz. Psychopathic friends do.