LogFAQs > #943520331

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	are some feelings really just less valid than others?
Kyuubi4269 08/18/20 5:21:02 AM #24:	Gaawa_chan posted... If your true feelings are fucking stupid, then yes. Give me a reasonable explanation for why consensual sexual activity is a reason to not respect someone or see them as unworthy, because it you can't, then yes, your precious feelings are not valid. A merchant can sell their goods for what it cost them to acquire it, but I'd have no respect for them. Either you have no sense of worth, or you aren't worth much; either option dealing with you isn't a respectable affair. _AdjI_ posted... For that matter, you know full well this isn't a matter of comparing a guy having 20 partners over 15 years to a girl having 5 in 1 year. I've personally seen you break out the "A key that fits many locks..." analogy in this context, so I really hope you don't plan on pretending you think there isn't a sexist double standard when it comes to promiscuity. If you can buy expensive goods then you're either high value or a good barterer. If you buy cheap tat anywhere then you'll get as much shit as any woman. _AdjI_ posted... why should sexual history have any bearing on a present relationship? Because if the bar for entry is low, anybody can get in. If little was expected from you to start the relationship then you're not necessarily bringing more to the table than anybody else. Either they cheat because it's easy to score, or they're monogamous and you have no idea how valuable you are to them that you couldn't be dumped for just anybody. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:943520331] in are some f... [t:78914327]...</cite> <quote>Gaawa_chan posted...</cite> <quote> If your true feelings are fucking stupid, then yes. Give me a reasonable explanation for why consensual sexual activity is a reason to not respect someone or see them as unworthy, because it you can't, then yes, your precious feelings are not valid. </quote> A merchant can sell their goods for what it cost them to acquire it, but I'd have no respect for them. Either you have no sense of worth, or you aren't worth much; either option dealing with you isn't a respectable affair. _AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote>For that matter, you know full well this isn't a matter of comparing a guy having 20 partners over 15 years to a girl having 5 in 1 year. I've personally seen you break out the "A key that fits many locks..." analogy in this context, so I really hope you don't plan on pretending you think there isn't a sexist double standard when it comes to promiscuity.</quote> If you can buy expensive goods then you're either high value or a good barterer. If you buy cheap tat anywhere then you'll get as much shit as any woman. _AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote>why should sexual history have any bearing on a present relationship?</quote> Because if the bar for entry is low, anybody can get in. If little was expected from you to start the relationship then you're not necessarily bringing more to the table than anybody else. Either they cheat because it's easy to score, or they're monogamous and you have no idea how valuable you are to them that you couldn't be dumped for just anybody. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1