LogFAQs > #926108384

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Epic Games refused to sell an indie game if it wasn't sold exclusively on EGS
Tropicalwood 08/15/19 2:49:26 PM #32:	DarthAragorn posted... Like this is legitimately the logic used by children that don't get their way Timmy boy is a literal manchild Pretty much, they're even bigger spoiled brats than the ones that gave them all the capital to start bribing devs for exclusivity. Not that exclusivity is a new thing, but traditionally a game was ALWAYS made to be exclusive, not some greasy fatcat coming up to them just before release and paying them to be on their platform. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:926108384] in Epic Games... [t:77940900]...</cite> <quote>DarthAragorn posted...</cite> <quote>Like this is legitimately the logic used by children that don't get their way Timmy boy is a literal manchild</quote> Pretty much, they're even bigger spoiled brats than the ones that gave them all the capital to start bribing devs for exclusivity. Not that exclusivity is a new thing, but traditionally a game was ALWAYS made to be exclusive, not some greasy fatcat coming up to them just before release and paying them to be on their platform. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1