LogFAQs > #913974002

He was a man trying to protect his land and livelihood. What's so far-right about that? Wouldn't *every* ideology -- except maybe communalists -- feel the same?

Full Throttle posted...

Trump repeatedly said in the midterms that the caravan was an INVASION but Bundy said "He has basically called them all criminals. What about the fathers, the mothers, the children, who have come here and willing to go through the process to apply for asylum so they can come into this country and benefit from not having to be oppressed continually by criminals?"

If they were willing to go through it, they would wait at ports of entry instead of trying to force their way in. And the concern that the caravan could result in a lot of illegal immigration is certainly a well-founded one.

BlackScythe0 posted...

The administration stated the only way to apply for asylum was through official ports of entry.

The violence happened because they also refused to process any applications at official ports of entry.

I got upset too when I first saw the footage and was in a very "they deserve it" point of view when people were crying about children getting gassed. But then I learned the conflict was intentionally set up by the administration. We have procedures and processes to deal with these situations, instead he halted those procedures and lined up people on the border to try getting some friendly photo ops to help him with his racist message.

You say that now, but we know that you wanted them walked across the border and set up in five-star hotels at taxpayer expense =p

BlackScythe0 posted...

Stephen Miller is a white nationalist

Source?
---

(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.