LogFAQs > #912887653

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Improvements Pokemon games need to keep from Let's Go
GuessMyUserName 11/23/18 2:11:37 AM #79:	SantaRPidgey posted... Pretending like Game freak couldn't do more is incredible. Like there's no reason at all this game couldn't have been the "Smash Ultimate" of pokemon. Like you don't have to compare it to red dead or zelda botw to know that them not including johto was them just being like "eh why bother" they have the money, resources, and support from nintendo to basically do whatever they want, but what they wanted to do was recreate kanto on a 1 to 1 scale with chibi graphics. And for some weird ass reason lots of people are like "Yeah that's worth the same price as zelda botw, mario odyssey, red dead redemption 2" Like what if you jumped from this universe to the universe where sakurai was just redoing smash 64 with better graphics and cute little nods to past 64 fans. You'd be like "yeah.. it's kind of a cool game but I can't believe people are excited over THIS" Like why does every other series get held to standards except for pokemon? That's the part that's bothering me. "Can" Game Freak do it? Sure. Not in a year, and not the features people are talking about here in a small-scale reimagining geared towards younger audience by an already young standard Pokemon's normally at. I don't think you realize how small Game Freak is. They've been a handeheld dev team since the 90s, they are not anywhere near the league Nintendo's major dev teams. The things you guys are asking for are going to take a much longer dev time than what Go got, which is longer than Go even deserves in the first place. Comparing Game Freak to EAD isn't a discussion. Game Freak =/= Nintendo, and taking Pokemon from Game Freak would be a major restructuring taking away from Nintendo's actual big teams. Saying it doesn't deserve to be full priced is fine, but that's the case of like 99% of the gaming market. You might as well say stop making retail Switch games at that point. This is just what the game has been marketed as since it was announced, and given the sales, demand is there for it. You're just not part of that demand. --- I request affiliated many pipes. Been a bad girl, I know I am. And I'm so hot, I need a fan. I don't want a boy, I need a man. <cite>GuessMyUserName posted [p:912887653] in Improvemen... [t:77226636]...</cite> <quote><cite>SantaRPidgey posted...</cite> <quote>Pretending like Game freak couldn't do more is incredible. Like there's no reason at all this game couldn't have been the "Smash Ultimate" of pokemon. Like you don't have to compare it to red dead or zelda botw to know that them not including johto was them just being like "eh why bother" they have the money, resources, and support from nintendo to basically do whatever they want, but what they wanted to do was recreate kanto on a 1 to 1 scale with chibi graphics. And for some weird ass reason lots of people are like "Yeah that's worth the same price as zelda botw, mario odyssey, red dead redemption 2" Like what if you jumped from this universe to the universe where sakurai was just redoing smash 64 with better graphics and cute little nods to past 64 fans. You'd be like "yeah.. it's kind of a cool game but I can't believe people are excited over THIS" Like why does every other series get held to standards except for pokemon? That's the part that's bothering me.</quote> "Can" Game Freak do it? Sure. Not in a year, and not the features people are talking about here in a small-scale reimagining geared towards younger audience by an already young standard Pokemon's normally at. I don't think you realize how small Game Freak is. They've been a handeheld dev team since the 90s, they are not anywhere near the league Nintendo's major dev teams. The things you guys are asking for are going to take a much longer dev time than what Go got, which is longer than Go even deserves in the first place. Comparing Game Freak to EAD isn't a discussion. Game Freak =/= Nintendo, and taking Pokemon from Game Freak would be a major restructuring taking away from Nintendo's actual big teams. Saying it doesn't deserve to be full priced is fine, but that's the case of like 99% of the gaming market. You might as well say stop making retail Switch games at that point. This is just what the game has been marketed as since it was announced, and given the sales, demand is there for it. You're just not part of that demand. --- I request affiliated many pipes. Been a bad girl, I know I am. And I'm so hot, I need a fan. I don't want a boy, I need a man.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1