LogFAQs > #905798992

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	When celebrities do heroin...they go to rehab. When normal people do heroin....
GreenKnight127 07/27/18 7:03:53 AM #67:	Keebs05 posted... Kyuubi4269 posted... Keebs05 posted... Kyuubi4269 posted... Notice how no scenario exists where a heroin user neither produced or had been supplied heroin. A crime was definitely committed so it's inappropriate to not give him at least the lower charge (aiding and abetting). With zero proof of production or a sale, an aiding and abetting charge will not stick. By denying one they implicitly confess to the other as no other circumstance exists. We know that heroin was aquired as they had/used it so they would be aware which one they did. They're a key witness in their own crimes. Well worded false dichotomy but it's hardly conclusive. Keebs, you are just being dense at this point. Kyuubi broke it down in the most easy-to-understand way possible. A person who used heroin either: A. produced the heroin themselves. (Illegal) B. bought it from a dealer. (Illegal) C. stumbled upon it in the god damn woods and chose to use it. (stupid and illegal) All I'm saying is that cops should question known heroin users. Find out how they got the heroin they used. Investigate. Find the dealer. Arrest the dealer. Because the user clearly knows how they got their heroin....and by choosing NOT to tell the cops....they are committing a crime by either covering their own ass who made the heroin, or the dealer who supplied them. Either way, I grow tired of druggies getting a pity party.....when what should REALLY be happening, is someone's ass goes to jail. --- ~Gamefaqs logic: Q: If it's so obviously a troll topic...why are you responding to it? A: "Because I have to tell them it's a troll topic!" facepalm <cite>GreenKnight127 posted [p:905798992] in When celeb... [t:76844877]...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>Notice how no scenario exists where a heroin user neither produced or had been supplied heroin. A crime was definitely committed so it's inappropriate to not give him at least the lower charge (aiding and abetting).</quote> With zero proof of production or a sale, an aiding and abetting charge will not stick.</quote> By denying one they implicitly confess to the other as no other circumstance exists. We know that heroin was aquired as they had/used it so they would be aware which one they did. They're a key witness in their own crimes.</quote> Well worded false dichotomy but it's hardly conclusive.</quote> Keebs, you are just being dense at this point. Kyuubi broke it down in the most easy-to-understand way possible. A person who used heroin either: A. produced the heroin themselves. (Illegal) B. bought it from a dealer. (Illegal) C. stumbled upon it in the god damn woods and chose to use it. (stupid and illegal) All I'm saying is that cops should question known heroin users. Find out how they got the heroin they used. Investigate. Find the dealer. Arrest the dealer. Because the user clearly knows how they got their heroin....and by choosing NOT to tell the cops....they are committing a crime by either covering their own ass who made the heroin, or the dealer who supplied them. Either way, I grow tired of druggies getting a pity party.....when what should REALLY be happening, is someone's ass goes to jail. --- ~Gamefaqs logic: Q: If it's so obviously a troll topic...why are you responding to it? A: "Because I have to tell them it's a troll topic!" facepalm</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1