LogFAQs > #905798909

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWhen celebrities do heroin...they go to rehab. When normal people do heroin....
Kyuubi4269
07/27/18 7:00:15 AM
#66:


Keebs05 posted...
Kyuubi4269 posted...
Keebs05 posted...
Kyuubi4269 posted...
Notice how no scenario exists where a heroin user neither produced or had been supplied heroin. A crime was definitely committed so it's inappropriate to not give him at least the lower charge (aiding and abetting).

With zero proof of production or a sale, an aiding and abetting charge will not stick.

By denying one they implicitly confess to the other as no other circumstance exists. We know that heroin was aquired as they had/used it so they would be aware which one they did. They're a key witness in their own crimes.

Well worded false dichotomy but it's hardly conclusive.

It's not a false dichotomy, there are no other options. If you believe it is, prove evidence.
---
Scloud posted...
Its like he wants two things at the same time.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1