LogFAQs > #887935809

Based on these two specific incidents, I consider the extreme on both ends to be white supremacy vs white inferiority, which sorta depends on which side you're on and whether you have a thing for the underdog or whatever else. In the US in particular you're weighing 73% ruling over 27% or the reverse. They're both terrible viewpoints and should be treated as such.

Like basically to me it's like, boiled down to its most basic measure, you have two cults

Cult A says suppress the voice of the non-believers by any means necessary
Cult B says suppress the voice of the non-believers by any means necessary

Cult A has a group of members that wander into peaceful proceedings, held by someone they have fingered out as a non-believer, and make a fuss where none should be made.
Cult B has a dude who hits a non-believer with a car.

If the dude from Cult B was in Cult A, he'd still be hitting people with cars-- that's the dude's interpretation of the command, specifically. Whether Cult B tends to draw more people who tend to find hitting people with cars to be a superior way of suppression is another thing, but I don't think it's specific to the message of the cult.

Now if you're gonna say Cult A is closer to the right message, well great, but it's not horseshoes-- the execution on either end making it so extremely "us vs them" is gonna warp the message to something not useful.
---

No problem!
This is a cute and pop genocide of love!