LogFAQs > #974832555

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Texas supreme court to decide if judges can deny same-sex marriages
Kradek 07/14/23 10:51:04 AM #60:	Tyranthraxus posted... They did https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respect_for_Marriage_Act This is pointless posturing. Courts have no say here. No they didn't. That only forces states where it becomes hypothetically illegal to recognize marriages from out of state. So when TX eventually bans it, they'll still be required to recognize marriage licenses from CA and NY, but it will still ban TX couples from getting married. The only thing actually preventing it is obergerfell, which this SC will 100% strike down, most likely with yet another fake ass case with no actual damages or injured party. --- My metal band, Ivory King, has 2 songs out now - allmylinks.com/ivorykingtx (all of our links there so you can choose which one you'd prefer to use) <cite>Kradek posted [p:974832555] in Texas supr... [t:80507975]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite><quote>They didhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respect_for_Marriage_Act This is pointless posturing. Courts have no say here.</quote>No they didn't. That only forces states where it becomes hypothetically illegal to recognize marriages from out of state. So when TX eventually bans it, they'll still be required to recognize marriage licenses from CA and NY, but it will still ban TX couples from getting married.The only thing actually preventing it is obergerfell, which this SC will 100% strike down, most likely with yet another fake ass case with no actual damages or injured party. --- My metal band, Ivory King, has 2 songs out now - allmylinks.com/ivorykingtx (all of our links there so you can choose which one you'd prefer to use)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1