LogFAQs > #879170786

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Trump allegedly gave classified security details to Russian ambassador
Zeus 05/15/17 8:55:55 PM #19:	Mead posted... https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-revealed-highly-classified-information-to-russian-foreign-minister-and-ambassador/2017/05/15/530c172a-3960-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html?utm_term=.7ed314af9040 Time will tell if this story is accurate, but The Washington Post is withholding most plot details, including the name of the city, at the urging of officials who warned that revealing them would jeopardize important intelligence capabilities. makes me think there is actual evidence that he did this LOL! It's the Washington Post, which didn't have a lot of credibility before Jeff Bezos took it over and went far worse afterward when it became a vehicle to attack Hillary's enemies. However, it would be hilarious if true and, since ISIS is against Russia as well, I'm not sure what potential damage could be a concern. SushiSquid posted... RedPixel posted... ... I'd take it with a grain of salt at this point-- Washington Post is a notorious liberal news source... They do have a clear bias. But they don't lie. This is a serious issue and they wouldn't report it without pretty good evidence. They do lie. The Washington Post has been forced to give back Pulitzer Prizes after it was revealed that their journalists made up entire stories. Their fact-checking department is as bad as the Rolling Stone's, so anything a journalist claims just goes through. MICHALECOLE posted... Hercular1 posted... SushiSquid posted... RedPixel posted... ... I'd take it with a grain of salt at this point-- Washington Post is a notorious liberal news source... They do have a clear bias. But they don't lie. This is a serious issue and they wouldn't report it without pretty good evidence. I really don't understand how anyone can believe anything at this point. The left is foaming at the mouth, and will use any source, verified or not, just to try to impeach Trump. Journalism is truly dead at this point. Yeah it's only the left that does this It's only the left that people don't scrutinize. You have to rely on social media rather than conventional media for fact-checking there, such as when the Rolling Stone's rape story was debunked which was something that no media source bothered looking into and just reported verbatim. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:879170786] in Trump alle... [t:75349460]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-revealed-highly-classified-information-to-russian-foreign-minister-and-ambassador/2017/05/15/530c172a-3960-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html?utm_term=.7ed314af9040 Time will tell if this story is accurate, but The Washington Post is withholding most plot details, including the name of the city, at the urging of officials who warned that revealing them would jeopardize important intelligence capabilities. makes me think there is actual evidence that he did this</quote> LOL! It's the Washington Post, which didn't have a lot of credibility before Jeff Bezos took it over and went far worse afterward when it became a vehicle to attack Hillary's enemies. However, it would be hilarious if true and, since ISIS is against Russia as well, I'm not sure what potential damage could be a concern. <cite>SushiSquid posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RedPixel posted...</cite> <quote>... I'd take it with a grain of salt at this point-- Washington Post is a notorious liberal news source...</quote> They do have a clear bias. But they don't lie. This is a serious issue and they wouldn't report it without pretty good evidence.</quote> They do lie. The Washington Post has been forced to give back Pulitzer Prizes after it was revealed that their journalists made up entire stories. Their fact-checking department is as bad as the Rolling Stone's, so anything a journalist claims just goes through. <cite>MICHALECOLE posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Hercular1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SushiSquid posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RedPixel posted...</cite> <quote>... I'd take it with a grain of salt at this point-- Washington Post is a notorious liberal news source...</quote> They do have a clear bias. But they don't lie. This is a serious issue and they wouldn't report it without pretty good evidence.</quote> I really don't understand how anyone can believe anything at this point. The left is foaming at the mouth, and will use any source, verified or not, just to try to impeach Trump. Journalism is truly dead at this point.</quote> Yeah it's only the left that does this</quote> It's only the left that people don't scrutinize. You have to rely on social media rather than conventional media for fact-checking there, such as when the Rolling Stone's rape story was debunked which was something that no media source bothered looking into and just reported verbatim. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1