LogFAQs > #877655626

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Whose obsession with Trump is more annoying?
Zeus 04/21/17 8:22:55 PM #32:	TES_Nut posted... Zeus posted... Pointing out when Erik is wrong isn't really defending Trump, it's defending the truth. More importantly, it's not really any different from the millions of other times I correct Erik's and others' lies, half-truths, and misinformation. Case-in-point would be their hysterics over rolling back Obama's executive orders regarding coal, because for some reason they thought we couldn't breathe the air in 2008. Their chicken little routines are really annoying. Restrictions (which hadn't even taken effect yet) or no, the coal industry is dead. It's not a regulation issue, it's simple ecenomics. No one wants coal anymore when after an initial investment to actually build the infastructre renuables are much cheaper. That plus atomation greatly reduces the need for human miners.The demand is gone, I'm sorry coal country but those jobs just aren't coming back. Which really isn't true, considering that in 2008, coal was responsible for almost half the US's electricity generation but, thanks to regulations, that was down to almost 33% by the time Obama left office. More importantly, renewables (excluding dams) make up a tiny portion of the overall energy generation. It's been more replaced by natural gas which has less regulation. Green energy is largely a pipe dream and, if it was actually viable, it would have been used a long time ago considering that it's received massive subsidies forever. Muffinz0rz posted... Zeus because Zeus is a sweet username that is forever unclean Sod your blasphemy, heretic. Erik_P posted... It's a good thing I never said we couldn't breathe the air in 2008. Except that's literally what you were saying about the rollback, ignoring the fact that it only brought us back to 2008's legislation Erik_P posted... Also, I'm still waiting on that source you said you would provide when you claimed coal is cheaper and cleaner than other energy sources. That was something like 2 weeks ago. As for your claim that you're defending the truth, well, you're defending Alternative Facts, and those don't count. Also, you need to stop purposefully and maliciously mistating what I actually said. And lol @ anti-reality Erik talking about alternative facts, which is all he ever posts. Erik_P posted... You have as much credibility as ICOYAR when he posts anything from Breitbart. Literally describing your entire existence. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:877655626] in Whose obse... [t:75256854]...</cite> <quote><cite>TES_Nut posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Pointing out when Erik is wrong isn't really defending Trump, it's defending the truth. More importantly, it's not really any different from the millions of other times I correct Erik's and others' lies, half-truths, and misinformation. Case-in-point would be their hysterics over rolling back Obama's executive orders regarding coal, because for some reason they thought we couldn't breathe the air in 2008. Their chicken little routines are really annoying.</quote> Restrictions (which hadn't even taken effect yet) or no, the coal industry is dead. It's not a regulation issue, it's simple ecenomics. No one wants coal anymore when after an initial investment to actually build the infastructre renuables are much cheaper. That plus atomation greatly reduces the need for human miners.The demand is gone, I'm sorry coal country but those jobs just aren't coming back.</quote> Which really isn't true, considering that in 2008, coal was responsible for almost half the US's electricity generation but, thanks to regulations, that was down to almost 33% by the time Obama left office. More importantly, renewables (excluding dams) make up a tiny portion of the overall energy generation. It's been more replaced by natural gas which has less regulation. Green energy is largely a pipe dream and, if it was actually viable, it would have been used a long time ago considering that it's received massive subsidies forever. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote>Zeus because Zeus is a sweet username that is forever unclean</quote> Sod your blasphemy, heretic. <cite>Erik_P posted...</cite> <quote>It's a good thing I never said we couldn't breathe the air in 2008. </quote> Except that's literally what you were saying about the rollback, ignoring the fact that it only brought us back to 2008's legislation <cite>Erik_P posted...</cite> <quote>Also, I'm still waiting on that source you said you would provide when you claimed coal is cheaper and cleaner than other energy sources. That was something like 2 weeks ago. As for your claim that you're defending the truth, well, you're defending Alternative Facts, and those don't count.</quote> Also, you need to stop purposefully and maliciously mistating what I actually said. And lol @ anti-reality Erik talking about alternative facts, which is all he ever posts. <cite>Erik_P posted...</cite> <quote>You have as much credibility as ICOYAR when he posts anything from Breitbart. </quote> Literally describing your entire existence. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1