LogFAQs > #986908580

UnfairRepresent posted...

You act like it's a zero sum game between Karl and Jirad where if we fight or raise awareness of Jirad's charity fraud then Karl "wins points."

Uh, no. No see, I haven't defended Jirard's actions. Like look at the topic title of the thread your posting in. You seem to be under the impression that anyone who goes after Jobst is defending Jirard. But that's not the case. I'm just saying that Jobst is worse than Jirard. because he's a nazi.

Ultimately I think Jirard did some fucked up stuff, but I don't care about it nearly as much as people willingly giving a Nazi a platform if it means they get to hate on him some more. You want to hate jirard cool. Keep hating him. I don't care, I'm not here to defend him. But I really wish you'd spend even 1% of the energy you spend condemning Jirard on calling out Jobst for being a literal Nazi. You're the only one here treating it like a zero sum game.

ADW posted...

If theres ultimately wrongdoing found and there are penalties/restitution they have to do/pay, would you rather that this have remained hidden forever just because Karl was one of the ones that exposed them?

If it's that extreme. Yes. If I absolutely had to choose between getting rid of a Nazi and a money-criminal getting off scot-free. I would choose to get rid of the Nazi. But I would also hope that someone who isn't a Nazi takes their place in making sure crimes like Jirard's are brought to justice; in addition to getting rid of the Nazi. But in a world where I can only have one. Get rid of the nazi.