LogFAQs > #978611402

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicIm like the only person that doesnt like the pixel remasters...
XxX_6GAMING9GOKU_XxX
02/02/24 8:27:28 AM
#63:


I think overall they're really good. I loved the remixed scores, rebalancing on certain mechanics, most of the spritework and the big one is honestly QoL changes. Theres like a zillion little things that add up compared to the classic versions that just makes it a smoother run on replays, and having the whole collection standardized on stuff like cursor memory options/autobattle/settings in one place without messing with pulling out a slew of consoles is a really nice thing.

I'm one of those weird people who goes back to them every 5 or 6 years and pixel remaster is definitely my preferred way to do stuff like the four job fiesta every few years now.

Fluttershy posted...
in the nes version the trick was to level them up using the bug that let you powerlevel by canceling out of casts.

i mean, be real, you're not casting that shit eight hundred times.

I think I probably did lol. My casters were on rod duty 90% of the time when I played the FF origins version of II. I *think* that had the classic NES mechanics. I remember losing stats a lot at any rate

E: It had worse spell growth than NES after checking, but no magic penalty for gear I guess? Its been awhile.

---
AND THIS. IS TO POST. EVEN FURTHER BEYOND!!!!!!!
I am the hope of the universe. I am the answer for all living things that cry out to post!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1