See, I don't even agree with that. It's more understandable, IMO, but I still think it's a stretch.
If the argument is that CC is the most popular OST on the board (I'd probably agree this is the case [though just asking CC v Umineko might be a bit interesting], but I would also suggest there's more to it than that,) sure, but the contest's structure never approached this in that fashion. It'd be like saying if the contest had been single-elimination that Chrono Cross got shafted in the Shatter match because some other game had the audacity to beat it before it got to Dreams of the Shore and Scars of Time.
If the argument is that the LB Final should have been 4/5/6 v 4/5/6, I'd understand the want for that, but the LB Final still wasn't the decisive match for the contest. It was, in essence, a semifinal, with AT2 having "won" its semifinal some time ago. In that light, why use the top tier songs in what is effectively a semifinal match? I mean, sure, you could do that, but I don't think it's some kind of "obviously should have been done" matter. The 4/5/6 version is being run here because this really is a finals.
tl;dr: Yeah, I get why people might not be happy Chrono Cross went out without Dreams of the Shore and Scars of Time being on the front lines, but I don't agree that the LB Finals was a stage that demanded their presence. This match would have been that stage.
--
xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out?
GotD (219/384) Melee v FFX