Lurker > TotallyNotMI

changmas posted...

i spell squm with a q u

Well, don't!

Corrik kept insisting that his lynch would prove that he wasn't lying about anything and now he's just claming vanilla?

lol

One thing I'll say about corrik is in the last Lea game I played, he was scum and I was town. We had kind of similar roles that were meant to mirror each other. He was so certain that I must be lying because my role was too close to his that he just went full on to try to get me lynched, harping on how he KNOWS I'm lying and how he's telling the truth because he convinced himself of it

I kind of think this might be happening again. For whatever reason, scum Corrik has convinced himself that his role works the way he thinks it should work and that he's telling the truth and Blade MUST be lying because of it.

Corrik7 posted...

I tried to stay away from the knightz stuff I did read because it made me uncomfortable and I felt wouldn't lead to a good place for the community. I didn't read all of day 1 but the sheer amount of people just saying he was certain scum was odd because I wasn't sure where the certainty of it was coming from. Then add in an underage user supposedly related to him or something and then him being a school age kid. I didn't feel comfortable wading into those waters. I felt confident on wallz at that time and if I had a shot would have shot wallz there. Lol

I don't think it was impossible for scum to sacrifice wallz to buy knightz at least one night

I think they got greedy by trying to push me instead to save both knightz and wallz

Oh you said leave it there

I should finish reading posts before i excitedly respond

Forceful_Dragon posted...

Did you ever deliberately reference your flavor?

If yes, I may have seen it. If no, then I'm misreading something that wasn't much to begin with. Either way we can leave it there.

I did!

Defending yourself is always lol but I'd like to point out I was heavily sus of both knightz and wallz d1 and knowing both their powers now scum me could've pretty easily have been pushing for wallz more but instead I was consistently voicing that between the two of them I would lynch Knightz

Knightz surviving just one night would give scum two scan results and be an absolute huge boon.

Well now I'm nosy

I think I trust his claim that he's hinting at but even without that yeah, the way that he's treated both Knightz and Wallz would have me trusting him today.

Editing fear is too hardwired into me still so I'll just repost

Basically confirmed
3. Chang
9. Kirby

Removed if we trust Ulti (which I do)
15. Ulti
5. Ctes
6. Death

People i feel good about for now:
1. Ben
2. Blade
7. FD
13. Sbell
14. Mzero (Replaced Taco)

The Rest:
4. Corrik
8. IGCD
11. Peaf
12. Red

Of those I'm most interested in pursing Corrik and Red today

##Vote: Corrik

You should stop being argumentative and give us a full claim

Oops I have Ben and Blade in the wrong section they should be in I Feel Good About them

Idk if i can edit in this game so you get what you get

Basically confirmed
3. Chang
9. Kirby

Removed if we trust Ulti (which I do)
15. Ulti

1. Ben
2. Blade
5. Ctes
6. Death

People i feel good about for now:
7. FD
13. Sbell
14. Mzero (Replaced Taco)

The Rest:
4. Corrik
8. IGCD
11. Peaf
12. Red

Of those I'm most interested in pursing Corrik and Red today

Man I pushed both knightz and wallz and here I am still in peoples list of 3 today rude

I feel like if we take Ulti's hints here we have like a very small sample size of people we can lynch though since all try to not take it personally

Of course godfather is probably a thing but we can worry about that later

Production value looks high. I'm hyped.

Oh, hello there Ben ;)

For the record, as unfun as I found this role I understand using it and ultimately you're going to be lynching who I was voting for and we now have you as confirmed town, so really I think this was a successfully day.

Reminder that Corrik hasn't actually claimed and only claimed an action - since he's saying he has no problem with Kirby's claim co-existing with his, it seems he isn't claiming a full time roleblocker.

PeaceFrog posted...

And sure i think red is scummy too, mi, but putting him up as an option when we have at least one player in front of us deliberately lying feels like kicking the can down the road.

It's not like chang is going to listen to me here anyway so

PeaceFrog posted...

Why include red, when he is not involved in the claim/ counterclaim conundrums?

Because I think he's scum?

I'd recommend one of corrik/red/wallz personally.

See you day 3.

(I'll still be around but my enthusiasm has plummeted for now)

I'm never a fan of roles that shut a day down

I suggest chang decide the lynch at 6pm est tonight so we can get to d3 sooner

Oh

I can't help but feel nothing is going to happen and chang has just chosen chaos

Oh you're a lawyer aren't you

I watched it because you're cute.

For everyone else's knowledge it is a flavor claim only. Jeff Winger.

I'm not watching that.

Yeah let's just ignore Wallz for 3+ days to hope that everything works out well

my kingdom for a dayvig shot

Obellisk posted...

because corrik killed scum in 1 post last game

Does that prevent Corrik from lying about his role as he is well known for doing as either alignment?

I support lynching Wallz not because I'm convinced that the NK was stopped by the jailkeeping (although it's possible) but because he claimed confirmable D1 to get pressure off of himself as a backup.

I agree with what whoever said earlier that if he is Scum Backup he could get access to Knightz OP role and I don't want that to happen.

Imagine thinking that town has two roleblockers and they blocked the scum kill and the SK on N1

yes

I think it's even worse than that Blade

SBell is asking you to say WHAT your action was.

ew sbell

Have you seen Kirby's claim, Corrik?

oh mzero

Ehh I changed my mind, Chang isn't here yet and I'm bored waiting for him so

##Unvote:
##Vote: Wallz

I mean he kind of did by saying 'well my roleblock doesn't notify the person i blocked them'

what is that?

Well we're 0 / 1 of confirmable claims actually being confirmable, so...

I'm still not moving my vote off of Chang until that whole ordeal happens, but consider my vote tenatively on wallz right now

Obellisk posted...

corriks expose doc gambit failed. this is gambit no 2?

I can't see scum sacrificing two of themselves just to get a doc counter claim

wallmasterz posted...

Of course its confirmable. It just requires backing up a confirmable role. If needed Id let the majority decide who I back up, I dont care.

So we have to hope there's a confirmable role in the game, hope that it gets killled, give you an extra night to get the power, give another night for you to use the power.

By the time that's all happened, the game is probably over!

But on the other hand Kirby instigated this STC which doesn't seem like something that scum would do so he's probably legit

I don't like either of these claims tbh

Kirby321 posted...

I mean, Corrik is obviously lying. Any doctor using their brain would protect MZero.

Kirby321 posted...

I don't see another Doctor-like role existing.

:thinking:

Kirby321 posted...

I mean, Corrik is obviously lying. Any doctor using their brain would protect MZero. By protecting the Taunter who can stop nightkills just by taunting scum, it'd effectively act as a doc save + cop scan in one action. That's massive, especially if we have another dedicated investigative role.

Now, that's assuming the doctor isn't an idiot, at least. Protecting MZero is very clearly the optimal play here. Which is why I'm interested in hearing who MZero targeted last night, because it's more likely than not the reason why there was no kill last night.

Kirby, why do you write this post confident that there's a doctor in the game?

wallmasterz posted...

Ill do my best to stay current but will be mostly busy with my kids until deadline, unfortunately.

My role is confirmable. Id really prefer not to have a repeat of last game where town power had to out themselves to live but Ill do my best to monitor that situation and judge accordingly

What Wallz said near the end of D1. I was hoping he said more about it, but this was it.

I still don't feel like this is confirmable.

Wallz I remember you said you were confirmable. How is backup confirmable?

I mean, didn't you just see our discussion regarding Corrik how roleblocking n1 does not necessarily mean you blocked the kill? It's possible but there's a lot of other options to feel confident about that.