Lurker > Ryangrad

evilpresident posted...

Of course! Come with me into this dark alley away from prying eyes and ill give you a blood sample.

On the one hand, I would say don't trust this guy, he's evil. On the other hand, he is the president!

s0nicfan posted...

What are they giving feedback on?

This. Without you creating a product to begin with, there can obviously be no feedback.

SAlYAN posted...

So, effectively they're all voting for Trump.

It's actually a vote for Biden in the sense that they would, if they were voting, vote for the person who would enact horrible laws that Trump and Republicans would pass. Because they are taught a lot of the same bigoted views as many "Christians" are taught. The evil of the gays, trans, etc...

CobraGT posted...

I searched because The Jehova Witnesses are hosting a Convention and I wondered how they are voting.

Conventions aren't like that. They are just much bigger assemblies with people from all over the region(sometimes coming from other countries to speak as well), that happen a few times a year. Instead of the same Brothers giving the same(similar) talks every week. They don't vote(not supposed to) and they would never tell the congregation who to vote for, let alone telling them to vote at all. You'd be disciplined so quickly, and maybe disfellowshiped if you kept it up.

Due to their belief in God's kingdom as the only legitimate form of governance, Jehovah's Witnesses do not participate in political activities, such as voting in elections. They refrain from saluting the flag of any country or singing nationalistic songs, which they believe are forms of worship.

It's not even a little surprising that he would say something like this. You don't have to wonder who paid him to quit Congress and try to run against Biden. From what I recall, the going rate was $25 million for a Democrat to run against Biden.

McMarbles posted...

TIL the entire US government is one dipshit chud congressman putting up a bill to vice-signal.

Totally not a disingenuous thread title, no sir.

Yeah. A POS Republican doing this means nothing. Now if a bunch of other people from other parties piles on and it passes, then we should be making a monstrous uproar about this.

GuerrillaSoldier posted...

no, is that real, that sounds stupid as fuck

Real as in him existing and these videos were made? Yeah. Real as in they actually went on hunger strikes? No, I sincerely doubt it.

On the other hand, people are....people.

pretzelcoatl posted...

enjoying myself

Imagine acting like that on this board and actually enjoying it.

pretzelcoatl posted...

imagine caring about sports enough to know an umpire's name

You act like knowing a person's name is somehow a negative, but you are doing this with your life.

Kaldrenthebold posted...

This made me laugh far more than I thought it would

Same here. I actually laughed out loud.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/c/ca6709d7.jpg

Who was that bootlicking chud in the topic about this originally trying to smugly suggest that he was the only rational person and everyone else was crazed with ACAB-riddled brains?

I don't judge anyone for the food that they eat. That's on them. Eat what you want. I neither gain not lose anything from what you like to eat.

Does Israel think pressuring the UN to cut the number actually make any difference? We still see what we see, and that number is still absurdly high. It's also BS considering officially they can only argue about 10,000 of the 34,000 killed as having "incomplete" data on those people. And in those cases, it's because of how much IDF brutalized them and they can't verify the remains. Couple that with you displacing MILLIONS and you can see how IDing might be a bit tricky.

I don't know what that is.

cjsdowg posted...

Nothing I stated was wrong. You are defended bull shit from the dems as usual. And nothing is short sided by pointing that they helped stablized the Republicans. Them fighting is a win for democrats.

Democrats aren't fighting for Republicans. That is what you said and it is wrong. They aren't stabilizing the Republicans. They are stabilizing the government at best, if you want to word it that way. You are very short sighted. Hell, under Johnson Republicans are losing seats with people just walking away. While Democrats still get some legislation they want done. Republicans fighting does not help Democrats right now(because they wouldn't be able to get anything passed) nor later, because people will vote out do nothing Dems. They like do nothing Republicans.

But I must apologize. I came in hot and hostile. Which is a douche move, and in no way helpful to an argument.

Diceheist posted...

The government didn't shut down, they passed continuing resolutions to keep the government open until a Speaker was chosen.

Sorry, I didn't mean shut down. I don't know why I worded it that way. I meant that the government essentially couldn't function. Not much could happen without a Speaker of the House, really.

ButteryMales posted...

More for Israel than Ukraine.

No. A clean Israel funding bill was DOA already. One without the funding swaps from other US programs. And Biden said if it somehow did get to his desk he would veto one. No funding for Israel without Ukraine and the other stuff. This was a sticking point for the Democrats.

cjsdowg posted...

If they are fighting among each other then they can do less harm. But dems always fight for Republicans.

Zero good happened when the government shut down. The House can't really do anything "bad" because the Senate and White House wouldn't approve of it anyway without it being bipartisan.

You are, as usual, wrong and also incredibly shortsighted.

C_Pain posted...

The statement is obviously insane but why is ethnically cleanse in quotes when he didn't say that or mention ethnicity at all?

Why are you claiming he didn't say it?

I get that you can't spend it on anything that will be even at least temporarily permanent. But how cheeky is it to say get your gutters, air ducts, sewer pipes cleaned? I know that isn't the point of this exercise, but going by your rules, I wouldn't have anything new at the end of this. I'm not getting anything repaired(that is almost always a new thing, even if just replacing a single part), but it's the "experience" of getting something cleaned!

Choco posted...

ce got really mad at me when i questioned why americans wear cloth masks

You trolled about it saying people might as well not wear masks at all, and you were told something is better than nothing.

I'm pretty sure I've seen Garioshi dressed as in traditionally leaning "male" and "female" clothing. So this could just be about him feeling like he doesn't have to announce or "come out" as anything, nor does anyone else. Not in a shaming way, but in a "my own business what I do" way.

But I could be wrong.

JasonSehorn posted...

def is a terrible person and i feel bad for his parents

...But you're Muffinz, so...

ClayGuida posted...

Ukraine hasn't got funding since Johnson took over. Why would anything change?

Because that would be the deal to be made with him. Funding of Ukraine to secure his position. If an actual vote were to come up for him to vacate, he couldn't lose a single Republican vote if he wanted to stay in power. This is just a potential for a deal to be made. Who knows if it would ever get to that point. A deal was made for funding the US, but that is a different beast.

ScazarMeltex posted...

At this point, the dems shouldn't work with them at all. It's time to let the GOP own the shitshow they created by letting literal fascists into the party.

Not working together is fine for many Republicans, because no matter how selfish, stupid, evil, and corrupt they are, their base will never call them on it, and the media at large will give them a pass. Hell, their base wants them to never work together. Meanwhile "swing voters" will ignore Republicans refusing to come together and compromise, but they'll tar and feather a Democrat that doesn't completely fold 100% of the time as opposed to caving just 80% of the time.

But not working with Republicans doesn't help Democrats, and in this specific instance, it would only cause harm for more people. Republicans would still be in control after the chaos concluded, the same as they remained in control the last time it just happened. Better to get something from it than nothing. This would not be bailing out Republicans. It would be securing the funding needed to get help to Ukraine, and stopping another circus from happening.

Democrats need to use all of this stuff in the following months though. Campaigns against Republicans need to highlight the uselessness of Republicans who hold a majority in the House, but are spending time fighting each other and parading around foreign spies peddling lies.

Ricemills posted...

You're deflecting that under Biden administration there's far greater messacre happening than other presidents. And it's supported by the fact that Biden stated that he's a Zionist and give the full support to Israel without any red line to cross, during the genocide that's still happening at the time.

Not deflecting. Again, your reading comprehension skills are terrible. You can't even follow a simple quote.

You, sir, from the quote posted, mentioned Trump and Biden, saying that Biden has done what Trump hasn't. "Trump hasn't done that yet, but Biden already did."
I didn't deflect a thing. I pointed out point blank how Trump already did do the thing you claimed he hadn't. That's all. Pointing out how you are wrong is not a deflection. You are simply wrong, outright lying on more than one occasion, and are now proving yourself to be a reprehensible being.

Ricemills posted...

Get a mirror, you people can't even comprehend that a criticism on Biden doesn't mean a support for Trump.
You people treated Biden as a perfect being without a flaw, and all of his decisions are perfect especially on the genocide of the Palestinians.
Everytime someone complained you people always deflect to "Trump will do the same or worse", without seeing the irony that Biden letting himself doing the same thing with Trump.

Again, factually wrong across the board. When did I say or do any of the things you are saying I did? I even specifically said the exact opposite. I see no point in engaging with someone whose reading skills are as poor as yours, honestly. I'm not "you people", I am me. Don't respond to me with grief you have with someone else. I didn't say any of that. At all.

Ricemills posted...

Are you trying to deny that Biden doesn't help funding this current genocide?
Over 30 thousands people killed and that's only in this last 6 months, all during Biden presidency.

Your reading comprehension skills need to be greatly improved if you want to attempt to hold a conversation here. At the very least, try to read only what is written. Don't try to assume opinions not given. You are very much out of your depth.

Ricemills posted...

@Dudebuster

You call a criticism to Biden is a support for Trump?
Of course you are. Every Biden fanatics did.

I even include the word "yet", which means Trump will also do that.

But I've seen your posts. You are mostly accusing everyone for something.

Again, you are factually wrong though. Trump did. As has every US President since we established this nation of Israel. Criticism of Biden is not the issue in and of itself.

And you are once again using textbook right-wing bullshit with phrases "Biden fanatics" and suggesting that being anti-fascist practically makes one a fascist.

Ricemills posted...

And this is why Americans are shit in politics.
Any people that doesn't support their candidate are labeled as the enemy and calling them as trolls.
Fucking tribalism has rooted deep in American mentality.

I think the problem you have is you are wrong about the things you are talking about, you are using boilerplate right-wing troll talking points, and defending yourself with textbook troll defenses.

I don't think you are a troll, but you really don't need to be in a discussion about things you don't understand whilst taking down to others. You certainly have the right to do so. The boards and topics are open to everyone. But understand that after decades of these tactics from right-wingers, people have little patience to handhold those who are genuine in their ignorance.

And now that neo-nazi StoneToss has been revealed to be Hans Kristian Graebener, naturally Elon Musk is going out of his way, and in direct violation of his own rules, to ban anyone that mentions neo-nazi Hans Kristian Graebener. Because protecting his favorite neo-nazi cartoonist is very important.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/c/cfbfc120.jpg
I imagine you all know what "it" is.

GeneSnitsky posted...

Weird how so many people lack reading comprehension in this topic.

Nope. It's just a fact that he's a shitty troll. And then you show up to continue even after he admitted he was wrong... Hmmm...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/a/a5b63d50.png
He's suspended for his trolling by the way.

That's a good question. From the outside looking in, it seems to be the case. But I'm so old I wouldn't even know for sure. It seems just like the last batch of hipsters though. Only difference is on the hair. The broccoli top is the style now.

I think if we do give this group a "unique" name, it should just be broccoli top. But in a good natured ribbing kind of way. Not to be mean. Because our shit was cringe 20 years ago too. That's just the cycle.

boxoto posted...

Rockstar Games' fifth Grand Theft Auto title

I hate myself a little bit because of my pedantic reaction to this line. It is not the Fifth GTA. It isn't even the fifth mainline GTA. This writer doesn't know videogames.

Well, ignore me and my annoying commentary.

falayyou01 posted...

hows that? Im talking about English football (soccer) here.

It's a meme. To say it about things that have nothing to do with Bush is the joke.

CountCorvinus posted...

If it makes you feel any better, I understood your post.

I don't like to speak for others and say that "everyone" did, but it seems like he was the only person in here that somehow got it twisted about what Greg meant. Not sure how he did that.

Heineken14 posted...

Did you watch it? He literally did that.

That's why you don't respond to UR. It's just not worth it. No matter what the situation, he's going to find a way to be dead wrong yet still argue about something.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

Nazism is a form of fascism,[5][6][7][8] with disdain for liberal democracy and the parliamentary system. It incorporates a dictatorship,[4] fervent antisemitism, anti-communism, anti-Slavism,[9] scientific racism, white supremacy, Nordicism, social Darwinism and the use of eugenics into its creed.

I mean, he checks every single box except maybe his antisemitism isn't fervent enough? I'm sorry, but... that's a Nazi.

LightningThief posted...

That's my bad, read his post while reading that other user's post and mixed up their positions.

Ah, no worries. If we are keeping score, that's something that I do with far too much regularity.

LightningThief posted...

Clearly everybody doesn't hence how unpopular the slogan was.

I'm not sure what you meant by this. Are you implying that if everyone interpreted it the way he described that it would have more popular? Or is this sarcasm? Sorry, I'm not great at reading into comments like this. Bare with me.

I don't think any of you trying to argue against a very well-spoken lawyer are going to make much headway. Don't try to be cute with deflections. He'll shred you apart.

EDIT: That was directed towards the last poster or anything. Just a general statement of things I noticed with Zell. The guy(?) is excellent at this.

ForsakenHermit posted...

Bullshit on the latter point you claimed that my argument was based on Trump being too narcissistic to be a nazi which you pulled right out of your ass and refuse to concede. I have made far more concessions in this topic than you. You don't seem to be arguing from a place where you want to be correct you want to be right.

Okay, but you're wrong about that. I didn't say you based your argument on that. I said that it was part of your argument.

And I still don't think I'm 100% right. I mostly am just saying my opinion on Trump sides with the actual serving Nazi victims and historians that specialize in Nazi history.

ForsakenHermit posted...

I've already had plenty of rebuttals. I really don't think there's anything that can come further from this other than a massive flame war and people acting like just because they say something that makes them 100% right on everything. Like what you're doing right now.

I neither flamed you nor do I think I'm 100% right. So...that's just like...something you made up, man.

PaperSplash posted...

There's a reason you don't normally see that much cleavage on American TV and it has nothing to do with "wokeness"...

That's the funny bit about this too. You are 100% right. The side complaining about woke taking away their boobs needs to look around the company they keep. It's your puritanical evangelicals that have been the bane of your pervertedness all this time. The left want to free the titty!

Hollows posted...

It never did, just some silly buzzword Republicans came up with to demonize empathy.

Republicans did not come up with woke. It's just been appropriated, and yes as you said, demonized, by others. But it isn't a Republican invented buzzword.

Stay woke.

Why do people do the thing where they bring something up, only to say "I don't want to keep talking about it" when they get pushback? Seems like they want to say their piece while having no rebuttals, really.

And this dude straight up blocked me for pointing out that he deleted and reposted his shitpost hopping to get a reaction out of folks. You got what you wanted. Why block?