Current Events > Some dude on twitter compiled all of Sarah Jeongs racist tweets 2013-2018.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 7
Tyranthraxus 08/04/18 9:58:14 AM #52:	This guy here sums up my feelings on the issue https://mobile.twitter.com/True_Canuck1/status/1025590399279263744 --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:906249903] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote>This guy here sums up my feelings on the issue https://mobile.twitter.com/True_Canuck1/status/1025590399279263744</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nemu 08/04/18 9:58:19 AM #53:	So has she actually personally apologized for any of this? Only thing I've seen is that official statement by the Times which is a bundle of nothing unless it comes directly from her. <cite>nemu posted [p:906249905] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote>So has she actually personally apologized for any of this? Only thing I've seen is that official statement by the Times which is a bundle of nothing unless it comes directly from her.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NinjaWarrior455 08/04/18 9:59:15 AM #54:	Tyranthraxus posted... This guy here sums up my feelings on the issue https://mobile.twitter.com/True_Canuck1/status/1025590399279263744 Basically. --- Super Bowl 52 Champions!!!! http://myanimelist.net/animelist/NinjaWarrior457 <cite>NinjaWarrior455 posted [p:906249936] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>This guy here sums up my feelings on the issue https://mobile.twitter.com/True_Canuck1/status/1025590399279263744</quote> Basically.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alphamon 08/04/18 9:59:50 AM #55:	Tyranthraxus posted... This guy here sums up my feelings on the issue https://mobile.twitter.com/True_Canuck1/status/1025590399279263744 agreed <cite>Alphamon posted [p:906249949] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>This guy here sums up my feelings on the issue https://mobile.twitter.com/True_Canuck1/status/1025590399279263744</quote> agreed</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 08/04/18 10:00:55 AM #56:	Tyranthraxus posted... This guy here sums up my feelings on the issue https://mobile.twitter.com/True_Canuck1/status/1025590399279263744 Really, you could just as easily say "I sympathize with people defending her, but I sense some selective defense here" --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:906249981] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>This guy here sums up my feelings on the issue https://mobile.twitter.com/True_Canuck1/status/1025590399279263744</quote> Really, you could just as easily say "I sympathize with people defending her, but I sense some selective defense here"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 08/04/18 10:02:08 AM #57:	Tyranthraxus posted... This guy here sums up my feelings on the issue https://mobile.twitter.com/True_Canuck1/status/1025590399279263744 Fair enough, but can't we apply the inverse to everyone defending her? Namely, NYT, Vox, HuffPo, CElibs, etc.? If you find her tweets acceptable, doesn't that mean your problem with "real" racism is just faux outrage? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:906249998] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>This guy here sums up my feelings on the issue https://mobile.twitter.com/True_Canuck1/status/1025590399279263744</quote> Fair enough, but can't we apply the inverse to everyone defending her? Namely, NYT, Vox, HuffPo, CElibs, etc.? If you find her tweets acceptable, doesn't that mean your problem with "real" racism is just faux outrage?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#58	Post #58 was unavailable or deleted.
Coffeebeanz 08/04/18 10:04:31 AM #59:	darkjedilink posted... Tyranthraxus posted... This guy here sums up my feelings on the issue https://mobile.twitter.com/True_Canuck1/status/1025590399279263744 Fair enough, but can't we apply the inverse to everyone defending her? Namely, NYT, Vox, HuffPo, CElibs, etc.? If you find her tweets acceptable, doesn't that mean your problem with "real" racism is just faux outrage? Precisely. If they've never come to someone's defense before, why now? And ESPECIALLY with a person who has a textbook-load of racist tweets. Justine Sacco got crucified by Vox for a single tweet that actually was taken out of context. --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:906250068] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>This guy here sums up my feelings on the issue https://mobile.twitter.com/True_Canuck1/status/1025590399279263744</quote> Fair enough, but can't we apply the inverse to everyone defending her? Namely, NYT, Vox, HuffPo, CElibs, etc.? If you find her tweets acceptable, doesn't that mean your problem with "real" racism is just faux outrage?</quote> Precisely. If they've never come to someone's defense before, why now? And ESPECIALLY with a person who has a textbook-load of racist tweets. Justine Sacco got crucified by Vox for a single tweet that actually was taken out of context.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 08/04/18 10:09:04 AM #60:	darkjedilink posted... Tyranthraxus posted... This guy here sums up my feelings on the issue https://mobile.twitter.com/True_Canuck1/status/1025590399279263744 Fair enough, but can't we apply the inverse to everyone defending her? Namely, NYT, Vox, HuffPo, CElibs, etc.? If you find her tweets acceptable, doesn't that mean your problem with "real" racism is just faux outrage? I absolutely think that anyone who defends her tweets as just "countertrolling" is being a dishonest shitbag. That wasn't really the issue here. The issue is that you have a select group of people who essentially endorse racism so long as the racism isn't directed at themselves. And when it is directed at themselves, they suddenly want to benefit from the anti racist momentum they have been fighting against. This isn't necessarily hypocritical, you could say that it's just a guy looking out for his own best interests, but calling out the racism of only Asian/Black people is itself racist. You're applying a level of scrutinization that white people are not subjected to and against people who lack the ability to exercise their racist influence to the same extent as white people. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:906250207] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>This guy here sums up my feelings on the issue https://mobile.twitter.com/True_Canuck1/status/1025590399279263744</quote> Fair enough, but can't we apply the inverse to everyone defending her? Namely, NYT, Vox, HuffPo, CElibs, etc.? If you find her tweets acceptable, doesn't that mean your problem with "real" racism is just faux outrage?</quote> I absolutely think that anyone who defends her tweets as just "countertrolling" is being a dishonest shitbag. That wasn't really the issue here. The issue is that you have a select group of people who essentially endorse racism so long as the racism isn't directed at themselves. And when it is directed at themselves, they suddenly want to benefit from the anti racist momentum they have been fighting against. This isn't necessarily hypocritical, you could say that it's just a guy looking out for his own best interests, but calling out the racism of only Asian/Black people is itself racist. You're applying a level of scrutinization that white people are not subjected to and against people who lack the ability to exercise their racist influence to the same extent as white people.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SpiralDrift 08/04/18 10:13:22 AM #61:	I'm less concerned with her and more concerned with major news organizations condoning the racism. Nothing good could come of that. --- Do unto others what your parents did to you. <cite>SpiralDrift posted [p:906250342] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote>I'm less concerned with her and more concerned with major news organizations condoning the racism. Nothing good could come of that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 08/04/18 10:13:33 AM #62:	Tyranthraxus posted... The issue is that you have a select group of people who essentially endorse racism so long as the racism isn't directed at themselves. And when it is directed at themselves, they suddenly want to benefit from the anti racist momentum they have been fighting against. No, the issue is that you seem to miss the hypocrisy of the left in general on this issue, and the NYT in particular. Either firing people for racism is right, and good, and wholesome, which it is when the left does it, so this woman should be fired with no defense from the left, or it ISN'T, and the left needs to own up to their shittiness. This isn't necessarily hypocritical, you could say that it's just a guy looking out for his own best interests, but calling out the racism of only Asian/Black people is itself racist. You're applying a level of scrutinization that white people are not subjected to and against people who lack the ability to exercise their racist influence to the same extent as white people. No, I'm not applying any level of scrutiny different to one group. YOU are. YOUR side made these rules, and now it's only a problem when your side is FINALLY being shown that you're just as bad. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:906250347] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>The issue is that you have a select group of people who essentially endorse racism so long as the racism isn't directed at themselves. And when it is directed at themselves, they suddenly want to benefit from the anti racist momentum they have been fighting against.</quote> No, the issue is that you seem to miss the hypocrisy of the left in general on this issue, and the NYT in particular. Either firing people for racism is right, and good, and wholesome, which it is when the left does it, so this woman should be fired with no defense from the left, or it ISN'T, and the left needs to own up to their shittiness. <quote>This isn't necessarily hypocritical, you could say that it's just a guy looking out for his own best interests, but calling out the racism of only Asian/Black people is itself racist. You're applying a level of scrutinization that white people are not subjected to and against people who lack the ability to exercise their racist influence to the same extent as white people.</quote> No, I'm not applying any level of scrutiny different to one group. YOU are. YOUR side made these rules, and now it's only a problem when your side is FINALLY being shown that you're just as bad.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EnragedSlith 08/04/18 10:15:11 AM #63:	Yeah, this woman is poison. She needs to go. --- ultimate milf hunter https://imgur.com/lCEdce6 https://imgur.com/2N1Ezia https://imgur.com/ukJ6sPJ https://youtu.be/IDYaHvDiTr4 <cite>EnragedSlith posted [p:906250389] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote>Yeah, this woman is poison. She needs to go.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 08/04/18 10:18:05 AM #64:	All these media sources coming to her defense after gleefully partaking in the internet outrage mob justice movement in the past makes them look exceptionally hypocritical. Especially given the sheer volume of vile things she's written. --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:906250485] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote>All these media sources coming to her defense after gleefully partaking in the internet outrage mob justice movement in the past makes them look exceptionally hypocritical. Especially given the sheer volume of vile things she's written.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 08/04/18 10:19:12 AM #65:	darkjedilink posted... No, the issue is that you seem to miss the hypocrisy of the left in general on this issue, and the NYT in particular. Either firing people for racism is right, and good, and wholesome, which it is when the left does it, so this woman should be fired with no defense from the left, or it ISN'T, and the left needs to own up to their shittiness. Plenty of people "on the left" have called for her to be fired as well as called her out. The problem is it's simply never going to be good enough for you, because you've created a world in your mind where if one person who disagrees with you about one issue, it makes them an entire representation of the other side. It's fucking stupid no matter who does it. This woman should have never been hired and dismissed already. darkjedilink posted... No, I'm not applying any level of scrutiny different to one group. YOU are. YOUR side made these rules, and now it's only a problem when your side is FINALLY being shown that you're just as bad. See, you're just as bad and divisive as the people you condemn. You don't actually give a shit about people being together, you like attacking and shitting on "the other side" because of your own issues and wanting to emulate Trump. It's really fucking sad. --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXezjbuzh14 <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:906250519] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>No, the issue is that you seem to miss the hypocrisy of the left in general on this issue, and the NYT in particular. Either firing people for racism is right, and good, and wholesome, which it is when the left does it, so this woman should be fired with no defense from the left, or it ISN'T, and the left needs to own up to their shittiness.</quote> Plenty of people "on the left" have called for her to be fired as well as called her out. The problem is it's simply never going to be good enough for you, because you've created a world in your mind where if one person who disagrees with you about one issue, it makes them an entire representation of the other side. It's fucking stupid no matter who does it. This woman should have never been hired and dismissed already. <cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>No, I'm not applying any level of scrutiny different to one group. YOU are. YOUR side made these rules, and now it's only a problem when your side is FINALLY being shown that you're just as bad.</quote> See, you're just as bad and divisive as the people you condemn. You don't actually give a shit about people being together, you like attacking and shitting on "the other side" because of your own issues and wanting to emulate Trump. It's really fucking sad.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 08/04/18 10:22:57 AM #66:	darkjedilink posted... No, the issue is that you seem to miss the hypocrisy of the left in general on this issue, and the NYT in particular. Either firing people for racism is right, and good, and wholesome, which it is when the left does it, so this woman should be fired with no defense from the left, or it ISN'T, and the left needs to own up to their shittiness. Who is Kathy Griffin? darkjedilink posted... No, I'm not applying any level of scrutiny different to one group. YOU are. YOUR side made these rules, and now it's only a problem when your side is FINALLY being shown that you're just as bad. No that's exactly what you are doing and that's why it's so fucking hard to have an honest conversation about politics on the internet. People like you come in and fucking turn whatever discussion people were trying to have into Red vs Blue. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:906250636] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>No, the issue is that you seem to miss the hypocrisy of the left in general on this issue, and the NYT in particular. Either firing people for racism is right, and good, and wholesome, which it is when the left does it, so this woman should be fired with no defense from the left, or it ISN'T, and the left needs to own up to their shittiness.</quote> Who is Kathy Griffin? <cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>No, I'm not applying any level of scrutiny different to one group. YOU are. YOUR side made these rules, and now it's only a problem when your side is FINALLY being shown that you're just as bad.</quote> No that's exactly what you are doing and that's why it's so fucking hard to have an honest conversation about politics on the internet. People like you come in and fucking turn whatever discussion people were trying to have into Red vs Blue.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 08/04/18 10:23:46 AM #67:	The Great Muta 22 posted... darkjedilink posted... No, the issue is that you seem to miss the hypocrisy of the left in general on this issue, and the NYT in particular. Either firing people for racism is right, and good, and wholesome, which it is when the left does it, so this woman should be fired with no defense from the left, or it ISN'T, and the left needs to own up to their shittiness. Plenty of people "on the left" have called for her to be fired as well as called her out. The problem is it's simply never going to be good enough for you, because you've created a world in your mind where if one person who disagrees with you about one issue, it makes them an entire representation of the other side. It's fucking stupid no matter who does it. This woman should have never been hired and dismissed already. darkjedilink posted... No, I'm not applying any level of scrutiny different to one group. YOU are. YOUR side made these rules, and now it's only a problem when your side is FINALLY being shown that you're just as bad. See, you're just as bad and divisive as the people you condemn. You don't actually give a shit about people being together, you like attacking and shitting on "the other side" because of your own issues and wanting to emulate Trump. It's really fucking sad. Show me some leftists demanding her firing. This is the first time YOU'VE actually suggested such, instead choosing to go "lol, conservative outrage!!!" And how does a GARY JOHNSON voter want to "emulate Trump?" Wouldn't you suggesting such stupidity be an example of what you accuse me of doing - just lumping someone with your hated group because they happen to disagree with you? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:906250658] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Great Muta 22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>No, the issue is that you seem to miss the hypocrisy of the left in general on this issue, and the NYT in particular. Either firing people for racism is right, and good, and wholesome, which it is when the left does it, so this woman should be fired with no defense from the left, or it ISN'T, and the left needs to own up to their shittiness.</quote> Plenty of people "on the left" have called for her to be fired as well as called her out. The problem is it's simply never going to be good enough for you, because you've created a world in your mind where if one person who disagrees with you about one issue, it makes them an entire representation of the other side. It's fucking stupid no matter who does it. This woman should have never been hired and dismissed already. <cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>No, I'm not applying any level of scrutiny different to one group. YOU are. YOUR side made these rules, and now it's only a problem when your side is FINALLY being shown that you're just as bad.</quote> See, you're just as bad and divisive as the people you condemn. You don't actually give a shit about people being together, you like attacking and shitting on "the other side" because of your own issues and wanting to emulate Trump. It's really fucking sad.</quote> Show me some leftists demanding her firing. This is the first time YOU'VE actually suggested such, instead choosing to go "lol, conservative outrage!!!" And how does a GARY JOHNSON voter want to "emulate Trump?" Wouldn't you suggesting such stupidity be an example of what you accuse me of doing - just lumping someone with your hated group because they happen to disagree with you?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
emblem boy 08/04/18 10:24:22 AM #68:	I'm new to this issue. Which magazines or people are the ones defending the tweets? --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>emblem boy posted [p:906250677] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote>I'm new to this issue. Which magazines or people are the ones defending the tweets?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 08/04/18 10:25:48 AM #69:	Tyranthraxus posted... darkjedilink posted... No, the issue is that you seem to miss the hypocrisy of the left in general on this issue, and the NYT in particular. Either firing people for racism is right, and good, and wholesome, which it is when the left does it, so this woman should be fired with no defense from the left, or it ISN'T, and the left needs to own up to their shittiness. Who is Kathy Griffin? darkjedilink posted... No, I'm not applying any level of scrutiny different to one group. YOU are. YOUR side made these rules, and now it's only a problem when your side is FINALLY being shown that you're just as bad. No that's exactly what you are doing and that's why it's so fucking hard to have an honest conversation about politics on the internet. People like you come in and fucking turn whatever discussion people were trying to have into Red vs Blue. Kathy Griffin was DEFENDED BY THE LEFT. And this situation IS RED VERSUS BLUE. You're in this very thread saying that nobody on the right can have a problem with the hypocrisy shown by NYT, Vox, HuffPo, etc. because it's "faux outrage." You WANT it to be fake partisanship, when your side is actually fucking doing the shitty things they're called out on. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:906250720] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>No, the issue is that you seem to miss the hypocrisy of the left in general on this issue, and the NYT in particular. Either firing people for racism is right, and good, and wholesome, which it is when the left does it, so this woman should be fired with no defense from the left, or it ISN'T, and the left needs to own up to their shittiness.</quote> Who is Kathy Griffin? <cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>No, I'm not applying any level of scrutiny different to one group. YOU are. YOUR side made these rules, and now it's only a problem when your side is FINALLY being shown that you're just as bad.</quote> No that's exactly what you are doing and that's why it's so fucking hard to have an honest conversation about politics on the internet. People like you come in and fucking turn whatever discussion people were trying to have into Red vs Blue.</quote> Kathy Griffin was DEFENDED BY THE LEFT. And this situation IS RED VERSUS BLUE. You're in this very thread saying that nobody on the right can have a problem with the hypocrisy shown by NYT, Vox, HuffPo, etc. because it's "faux outrage." You WANT it to be fake partisanship, when your side is actually fucking doing the shitty things they're called out on.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rimmer_Dall 08/04/18 10:26:19 AM #70:	emblem boy posted... I'm new to this issue. Which magazines or people are the ones defending the tweets? KIA has compiled a decent sized list of outlets condemning her vs outlets defending her. https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/943y9h/sarah_jeong_controversy_media_coverage/ --- "The cheese it yours turtles." ~ William Shakespeare <cite>Rimmer_Dall posted [p:906250737] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>emblem boy posted...</cite> <quote>I'm new to this issue. Which magazines or people are the ones defending the tweets?</quote> KIA has compiled a decent sized list of outlets condemning her vs outlets defending her. https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/943y9h/sarah_jeong_controversy_media_coverage/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gmanthebest 08/04/18 10:35:29 AM #71:	Agnostic420 posted... The biggest loser here is the dork that sat down at home and went through someones tweets to compile off of them and then post it online. What a fuckin loser. I'd say the biggest loser is the person tweeting a metric ton of racist shit. --- What do I feel when I shoot an enemy? Recoil. <cite>gmanthebest posted [p:906251029] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>Agnostic420 posted...</cite> <quote>The biggest loser here is the dork that sat down at home and went through someones tweets to compile off of them and then post it online. What a fuckin loser.</quote> I'd say the biggest loser is the person tweeting a metric ton of racist shit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Awesome 08/04/18 10:39:38 AM #72:	gmanthebest posted... Agnostic420 posted... The biggest loser here is the dork that sat down at home and went through someones tweets to compile off of them and then post it online. What a fuckin loser. I'd say the biggest loser is the person tweeting a metric ton of racist shit. Yeah but some people dont live in reality so theyd rather hate on the person hating on the racist. --- https://imgur.com/gWCYPlD https://imgur.com/J9kjYjA https://imgur.com/Ls3OgWR <cite>Awesome posted [p:906251190] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>gmanthebest posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Agnostic420 posted...</cite> <quote>The biggest loser here is the dork that sat down at home and went through someones tweets to compile off of them and then post it online. What a fuckin loser.</quote> I'd say the biggest loser is the person tweeting a metric ton of racist shit.</quote> Yeah but some people dont live in reality so theyd rather hate on the person hating on the racist.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 08/04/18 10:42:18 AM #73:	darkjedilink posted... Kathy Griffin was DEFENDED BY THE LEFT. And this situation IS RED VERSUS BLUE. You're in this very thread saying that nobody on the right can have a problem with the hypocrisy shown by NYT, Vox, HuffPo, etc. because it's "faux outrage." You WANT it to be fake partisanship, when your side is actually fucking doing the shitty things they're called out on. See, you're making this a partisan thing when it isn't and bringing up shit like Kathy Griffin that has nothing to do with the subject at hand. And hey, if you want to be a divisive ass then be my guest, but just accept that instead of pretending you actually care about bringing people together. Because ultimately you don't care at all and would rather just attack those with a different political opinion. You want a culture war where everyone hates each other, which is pathetic and tells me a lot about you. Again, what this woman said was horrible and she never should have been hired and dismissed already. Ultimately it's on NYT if they want to take the political hit for it. --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXezjbuzh14 <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:906251279] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Kathy Griffin was DEFENDED BY THE LEFT. And this situation IS RED VERSUS BLUE. You're in this very thread saying that nobody on the right can have a problem with the hypocrisy shown by NYT, Vox, HuffPo, etc. because it's "faux outrage." You WANT it to be fake partisanship, when your side is actually fucking doing the shitty things they're called out on.</quote> See, you're making this a partisan thing when it isn't and bringing up shit like Kathy Griffin that has nothing to do with the subject at hand. And hey, if you want to be a divisive ass then be my guest, but just accept that instead of pretending you actually care about bringing people together. Because ultimately you don't care at all and would rather just attack those with a different political opinion. You want a culture war where everyone hates each other, which is pathetic and tells me a lot about you. Again, what this woman said was horrible and she never should have been hired and dismissed already. Ultimately it's on NYT if they want to take the political hit for it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hop103 08/04/18 10:42:56 AM #74:	What does D&C say about what people like her have? Oh yeah ugliness of spirit. --- "In the name of the future moon I shall punish you"-Chibi Moon <cite>Hop103 posted [p:906251297] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote>What does D&C say about what people like her have? Oh yeah ugliness of spirit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rimmer_Dall 08/04/18 10:43:09 AM #75:	Again, Nick Monroe, the guy who dug up the tweets, is a freelance journalist. The fact that he's consistently so thorough when he investigates things just means he's good at his job. --- "The cheese it yours turtles." ~ William Shakespeare <cite>Rimmer_Dall posted [p:906251305] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote>Again, Nick Monroe, the guy who dug up the tweets, is a freelance journalist. The fact that he's consistently so thorough when he investigates things just means he's good at his job.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 08/04/18 10:43:11 AM #76:	Rimmer_Dall posted... emblem boy posted... I'm new to this issue. Which magazines or people are the ones defending the tweets? KIA has compiled a decent sized list of outlets condemning her vs outlets defending her. https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/943y9h/sarah_jeong_controversy_media_coverage/ And not a single leftist organization opposing her. The closest you get is BBC or The Hill, both of whom I consider neutral (BBC doesn't seem to have a slant in their writing at all, and The Hill seems to have as many super-left articles as super-right). However, BBC did alter their article after Anita Sarkeesian complained that it made Jeong "look bad." --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:906251307] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>emblem boy posted...</cite> <quote>I'm new to this issue. Which magazines or people are the ones defending the tweets?</quote> KIA has compiled a decent sized list of outlets condemning her vs outlets defending her. https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/943y9h/sarah_jeong_controversy_media_coverage/</quote> And not a single leftist organization opposing her. The closest you get is BBC or The Hill, both of whom I consider neutral (BBC doesn't seem to have a slant in their writing at all, and The Hill seems to have as many super-left articles as super-right). However, BBC did alter their article after Anita Sarkeesian complained that it made Jeong "look bad."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 08/04/18 10:43:59 AM #77:	darkjedilink posted... Show me some leftists demanding her firing. This is the first time YOU'VE actually suggested such, instead choosing to go "lol, conservative outrage!!!" And that's simply not true either, and I can show my posts from the day the story leaked if you want. See, you're making shit up to fit together the narrative you want to be true. --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXezjbuzh14 <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:906251336] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Show me some leftists demanding her firing. This is the first time YOU'VE actually suggested such, instead choosing to go "lol, conservative outrage!!!"</quote> And that's simply not true either, and I can show my posts from the day the story leaked if you want. See, you're making shit up to fit together the narrative you want to be true.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lordgold666 08/04/18 10:44:56 AM #78:	gmanthebest posted... Agnostic420 posted... The biggest loser here is the dork that sat down at home and went through someones tweets to compile off of them and then post it online. What a fuckin loser. I'd say the biggest loser is the person tweeting a metric ton of racist shit. ^^^^ --- 3DS: 1848-2391-0198 "May the Father of Understanding guide us" <cite>Lordgold666 posted [p:906251366] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>gmanthebest posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Agnostic420 posted...</cite> <quote>The biggest loser here is the dork that sat down at home and went through someones tweets to compile off of them and then post it online. What a fuckin loser.</quote> I'd say the biggest loser is the person tweeting a metric ton of racist shit.</quote> ^^^^</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
emblem boy 08/04/18 10:45:26 AM #79:	Rimmer_Dall posted... emblem boy posted... I'm new to this issue. Which magazines or people are the ones defending the tweets? KIA has compiled a decent sized list of outlets condemning her vs outlets defending her. https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/943y9h/sarah_jeong_controversy_media_coverage/ Fuck. Those are some disappointing responses from those sites defending the tweets --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>emblem boy posted [p:906251384] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>emblem boy posted...</cite> <quote> I'm new to this issue. Which magazines or people are the ones defending the tweets?</quote> KIA has compiled a decent sized list of outlets condemning her vs outlets defending her. https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/943y9h/sarah_jeong_controversy_media_coverage/</quote> Fuck. Those are some disappointing responses from those sites defending the tweets</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 08/04/18 10:46:46 AM #80:	emblem boy posted... Rimmer_Dall posted... emblem boy posted... I'm new to this issue. Which magazines or people are the ones defending the tweets? KIA has compiled a decent sized list of outlets condemning her vs outlets defending her. https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/943y9h/sarah_jeong_controversy_media_coverage/ Fuck. Those are some disappointing responses from those sites defending the tweets It shouldn't be, unless you think that these organizations haven't proven to be blatantly hypocritical when it comes to matters of race literally hundreds of times before. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:906251427] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>emblem boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>emblem boy posted...</cite> <quote> I'm new to this issue. Which magazines or people are the ones defending the tweets?</quote> KIA has compiled a decent sized list of outlets condemning her vs outlets defending her. https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/943y9h/sarah_jeong_controversy_media_coverage/</quote> Fuck. Those are some disappointing responses from those sites defending the tweets</quote> It shouldn't be, unless you think that these organizations haven't proven to be blatantly hypocritical when it comes to matters of race literally hundreds of times before.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
epik_fail1 08/04/18 10:56:00 AM #81:	I am pretty sure a lot of minorities are annoyed by her racism and think she should be fired. It's pretty sad that they hired that racist, it will fuel alt right idiots and they will use her bigotry against liberalism. She is exactly the reason why center-left people want to be called centrist. --- Primrose for smash <cite>epik_fail1 posted [p:906251750] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote>I am pretty sure a lot of minorities are annoyed by her racism and think she should be fired. It's pretty sad that they hired that racist, it will fuel alt right idiots and they will use her bigotry against liberalism. She is exactly the reason why center-left people want to be called centrist.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 08/04/18 11:05:40 AM #82:	Rimmer_Dall posted... averagejoel posted... ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat Umm... Ever heard of Haiti? Or WWII? The Jews were still technically white, not to mention all the Eastern Europeans and various Western Europeans that died because they were gay, etc. Then there are the massacres in former Yugoslavia... Oh, you also have Rhodesia and (currently) South Africa... There's really no excuse for that racist person to not be shamed mercilessly. --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:906252081] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat</quote> Umm... Ever heard of Haiti?</quote> Or WWII? The Jews were still technically white, not to mention all the Eastern Europeans and various Western Europeans that died because they were gay, etc. Then there are the massacres in former Yugoslavia... Oh, you also have Rhodesia and (currently) South Africa... There's really no excuse for that racist person to not be shamed mercilessly.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 08/04/18 11:12:33 AM #83:	TheCyborgNinja posted... Rimmer_Dall posted... averagejoel posted... ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat Umm... Ever heard of Haiti? Or WWII? The Jews were still technically white, not to mention all the Eastern Europeans and various Western Europeans that died because they were gay, etc. Then there are the massacres in former Yugoslavia... There's really no excuse for that racist person to not be shamed mercilessly. jews were not targeted because of the colour of their skin. neither were eastern europeans, LGBT+ people, or yugoslavians. but you already knew that --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:906252304] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat</quote> Umm... Ever heard of Haiti?</quote> Or WWII? The Jews were still technically white, not to mention all the Eastern Europeans and various Western Europeans that died because they were gay, etc. Then there are the massacres in former Yugoslavia... There's really no excuse for that racist person to not be shamed mercilessly.</quote> jews were not targeted because of the colour of their skin. neither were eastern europeans, LGBT+ people, or yugoslavians. but you already knew that</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 08/04/18 11:14:00 AM #84:	FabIemaster posted... averagejoel posted... Rimmer_Dall posted... averagejoel posted... ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat Umm... Ever heard of Haiti? yes Ever heard of South Africa right now? google "colonization" and "apartheid" then come back to this topic after reading something --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:906252355] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>FabIemaster posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat</quote> Umm... Ever heard of Haiti?</quote> yes</quote> Ever heard of South Africa right now?</quote> google "colonization" and "apartheid" then come back to this topic after reading something</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 08/04/18 11:14:16 AM #85:	averagejoel posted... TheCyborgNinja posted... Rimmer_Dall posted... averagejoel posted... ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat Umm... Ever heard of Haiti? Or WWII? The Jews were still technically white, not to mention all the Eastern Europeans and various Western Europeans that died because they were gay, etc. Then there are the massacres in former Yugoslavia... There's really no excuse for that racist person to not be shamed mercilessly. jews were not targeted because of the colour of their skin. neither were eastern europeans, LGBT+ people, or yugoslavians. but you already knew that So that makes it better? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:906252364] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat</quote> Umm... Ever heard of Haiti?</quote> Or WWII? The Jews were still technically white, not to mention all the Eastern Europeans and various Western Europeans that died because they were gay, etc. Then there are the massacres in former Yugoslavia... There's really no excuse for that racist person to not be shamed mercilessly.</quote> jews were not targeted because of the colour of their skin. neither were eastern europeans, LGBT+ people, or yugoslavians. but you already knew that</quote> So that makes it better?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 08/04/18 11:14:36 AM #86:	averagejoel posted... FabIemaster posted... averagejoel posted... Rimmer_Dall posted... averagejoel posted... ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat Umm... Ever heard of Haiti? yes Ever heard of South Africa right now? google "colonization" and "apartheid" then come back to this topic after reading something So that makes it better? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:906252379] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FabIemaster posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat</quote> Umm... Ever heard of Haiti?</quote> yes</quote> Ever heard of South Africa right now?</quote> google "colonization" and "apartheid" then come back to this topic after reading something</quote> So that makes it better?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rimmer_Dall 08/04/18 11:15:47 AM #87:	averagejoel posted... FabIemaster posted... averagejoel posted... Rimmer_Dall posted... averagejoel posted... ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat Umm... Ever heard of Haiti? yes Ever heard of South Africa right now? google "colonization" and "apartheid" then come back to this topic after reading something Google genocide of Khoisan, Khoikhoi and San peoples by Bantus before you try to justify genocide with "it's retribution for past crimes". --- "The cheese it yours turtles." ~ William Shakespeare <cite>Rimmer_Dall posted [p:906252427] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FabIemaster posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat</quote> Umm... Ever heard of Haiti?</quote> yes</quote> Ever heard of South Africa right now?</quote> google "colonization" and "apartheid" then come back to this topic after reading something</quote> Google genocide of Khoisan, Khoikhoi and San peoples by Bantus before you try to justify genocide with "it's retribution for past crimes".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wannabepranksta 08/04/18 11:16:35 AM #88:	It's okay to be racist towards whites, but when you have a white boyfriend and you are racist towards whites, that's just batshit crazy. --- shut up and take my money <cite>wannabepranksta posted [p:906252453] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote>It's okay to be racist towards whites, but when you have a white boyfriend and you are racist towards whites, that's just batshit crazy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 08/04/18 11:17:19 AM #89:	Rimmer_Dall posted... averagejoel posted... FabIemaster posted... averagejoel posted... Rimmer_Dall posted... averagejoel posted... ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat Umm... Ever heard of Haiti? yes Ever heard of South Africa right now? google "colonization" and "apartheid" then come back to this topic after reading something Google genocide of Khoisan, Khoikhoi and San peoples by Bantus before you try to justify genocide with "it's retribution for past crimes". genocide is not what's happening in South Africa now, and it's disingenuous and lazy to pretend otherwise --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:906252474] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FabIemaster posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat</quote> Umm... Ever heard of Haiti?</quote> yes</quote> Ever heard of South Africa right now?</quote> google "colonization" and "apartheid" then come back to this topic after reading something</quote> Google genocide of Khoisan, Khoikhoi and San peoples by Bantus before you try to justify genocide with "it's retribution for past crimes".</quote> genocide is not what's happening in South Africa now, and it's disingenuous and lazy to pretend otherwise</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 08/04/18 11:18:23 AM #90:	darkjedilink posted... averagejoel posted... TheCyborgNinja posted... Rimmer_Dall posted... averagejoel posted... ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat Umm... Ever heard of Haiti? Or WWII? The Jews were still technically white, not to mention all the Eastern Europeans and various Western Europeans that died because they were gay, etc. Then there are the massacres in former Yugoslavia... There's really no excuse for that racist person to not be shamed mercilessly. jews were not targeted because of the colour of their skin. neither were eastern europeans, LGBT+ people, or yugoslavians. but you already knew that So that makes it better? This. Trolling or just ignorant? All of those things were for ethnic reasons except the gay thing. --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:906252509] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat</quote> Umm... Ever heard of Haiti?</quote> Or WWII? The Jews were still technically white, not to mention all the Eastern Europeans and various Western Europeans that died because they were gay, etc. Then there are the massacres in former Yugoslavia... There's really no excuse for that racist person to not be shamed mercilessly.</quote> jews were not targeted because of the colour of their skin. neither were eastern europeans, LGBT+ people, or yugoslavians. but you already knew that</quote> So that makes it better?</quote> This. Trolling or just ignorant? All of those things were for ethnic reasons except the gay thing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 08/04/18 11:20:40 AM #91:	averagejoel posted... Rimmer_Dall posted... averagejoel posted... FabIemaster posted... averagejoel posted... Rimmer_Dall posted... averagejoel posted... ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat Umm... Ever heard of Haiti? yes Ever heard of South Africa right now? google "colonization" and "apartheid" then come back to this topic after reading something Google genocide of Khoisan, Khoikhoi and San peoples by Bantus before you try to justify genocide with "it's retribution for past crimes". genocide is not what's happening in South Africa now, and it's disingenuous and lazy to pretend otherwise Stealing of white people's land in the midst of calls for murdering all white people isn't genocide? The UN defines "genocide" as: Killing members of the group Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group I'm pretty sure that what's happening right now in SA would fit the second and third items on that list. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:906252594] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FabIemaster posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rimmer_Dall posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat</quote> Umm... Ever heard of Haiti?</quote> yes</quote> Ever heard of South Africa right now?</quote> google "colonization" and "apartheid" then come back to this topic after reading something</quote> Google genocide of Khoisan, Khoikhoi and San peoples by Bantus before you try to justify genocide with "it's retribution for past crimes".</quote> genocide is not what's happening in South Africa now, and it's disingenuous and lazy to pretend otherwise</quote> Stealing of white people's land in the midst of calls for murdering all white people isn't genocide? The UN defines "genocide" as: Killing members of the group Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group I'm pretty sure that what's happening right now in SA would fit the second and third items on that list.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 08/04/18 11:21:19 AM #92:	TheCyborgNinja posted... This. Trolling or just ignorant? All of those things were for ethnic reasons except the gay thing. ok but exactly 0 of them were specifically targeted for being white. therefore, it was not an ethnic cleansing of "white people" --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:906252614] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote>This. Trolling or just ignorant? All of those things were for ethnic reasons except the gay thing.</quote> ok but exactly 0 of them were specifically targeted for being white. therefore, it was not an ethnic cleansing of "white people"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 08/04/18 11:24:00 AM #93:	averagejoel posted... TheCyborgNinja posted... This. Trolling or just ignorant? All of those things were for ethnic reasons except the gay thing. ok but exactly 0 of them were specifically targeted for being white. therefore, it was not an ethnic cleansing of "white people" It's literally an ethnic cleansing of white people. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:906252701] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote>This. Trolling or just ignorant? All of those things were for ethnic reasons except the gay thing.</quote> ok but exactly 0 of them were specifically targeted for being white. therefore, it was not an ethnic cleansing of "white people"</quote> It's literally an ethnic cleansing of white people.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenLurker 08/04/18 11:26:31 AM #94:	gmanthebest posted... Agnostic420 posted... The biggest loser here is the dork that sat down at home and went through someones tweets to compile off of them and then post it online. What a fuckin loser. I'd say the biggest loser is the person tweeting a metric ton of racist shit. Nah she got a cushy job and legions of defenders for her shitty behaviour. The way I see it she could probably run for mayor or even president with all the support she has. --- [Insert tired meme here] <cite>HiddenLurker posted [p:906252784] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>gmanthebest posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Agnostic420 posted...</cite> <quote>The biggest loser here is the dork that sat down at home and went through someones tweets to compile off of them and then post it online. What a fuckin loser.</quote> I'd say the biggest loser is the person tweeting a metric ton of racist shit.</quote> Nah she got a cushy job and legions of defenders for her shitty behaviour. The way I see it she could probably run for mayor or even president with all the support she has.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 08/04/18 11:33:53 AM #95:	darkjedilink posted... averagejoel posted... TheCyborgNinja posted... This. Trolling or just ignorant? All of those things were for ethnic reasons except the gay thing. ok but exactly 0 of them were specifically targeted for being white. therefore, it was not an ethnic cleansing of "white people" It's literally an ethnic cleansing of white people. I see you're just going to keep doubling down on sheer ignorance and hyperbole today, eh? --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXezjbuzh14 <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:906253054] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote>This. Trolling or just ignorant? All of those things were for ethnic reasons except the gay thing.</quote> ok but exactly 0 of them were specifically targeted for being white. therefore, it was not an ethnic cleansing of "white people"</quote> It's literally an ethnic cleansing of white people.</quote> I see you're just going to keep doubling down on sheer ignorance and hyperbole today, eh?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gmanthebest 08/04/18 11:34:57 AM #96:	HiddenLurker posted... gmanthebest posted... Agnostic420 posted... The biggest loser here is the dork that sat down at home and went through someones tweets to compile off of them and then post it online. What a fuckin loser. I'd say the biggest loser is the person tweeting a metric ton of racist shit. Nah she got a cushy job and legions of defenders for her shitty behaviour. The way I see it she could probably run for mayor or even president with all the support she has. You can be successful and still be a loser, look at Trump --- What do I feel when I shoot an enemy? Recoil. <cite>gmanthebest posted [p:906253096] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>HiddenLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gmanthebest posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Agnostic420 posted...</cite> <quote>The biggest loser here is the dork that sat down at home and went through someones tweets to compile off of them and then post it online. What a fuckin loser.</quote> I'd say the biggest loser is the person tweeting a metric ton of racist shit.</quote> Nah she got a cushy job and legions of defenders for her shitty behaviour. The way I see it she could probably run for mayor or even president with all the support she has.</quote> You can be successful and still be a loser, look at Trump</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DuneMan 08/04/18 11:37:17 AM #97:	epik_fail1 posted... I am pretty sure a lot of minorities are annoyed by her racism and think she should be fired. It's pretty sad that they hired that racist, it will fuel alt right idiots and they will use her bigotry against liberalism. She is exactly the reason why center-left people want to be called centrist. There's a simple test for racism in this instance, and it's already been mentioned: replace instances of the word 'white' with 'black', 'Asian', 'hispanic', or other groups and see if you would still support the sentiment expressed. She's not alone in her racist sentiments, though people are calling it out more often. People rushing to defend her also move public sentiment away from the prior denial stance of 'SJW/Twitter leftists don't exist'. Equality isn't achieved by flipping scales and perpetuating sins against a new group. --- "I'd rather betray the world than let the world betray me." -Cao Cao <cite>DuneMan posted [p:906253165] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>epik_fail1 posted...</cite> <quote>I am pretty sure a lot of minorities are annoyed by her racism and think she should be fired. It's pretty sad that they hired that racist, it will fuel alt right idiots and they will use her bigotry against liberalism. She is exactly the reason why center-left people want to be called centrist.</quote> There's a simple test for racism in this instance, and it's already been mentioned: replace instances of the word 'white' with 'black', 'Asian', 'hispanic', or other groups and see if you would still support the sentiment expressed. She's not alone in her racist sentiments, though people are calling it out more often. People rushing to defend her also move public sentiment away from the prior denial stance of 'SJW/Twitter leftists don't exist'. Equality isn't achieved by flipping scales and perpetuating sins against a new group.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 08/04/18 11:40:42 AM #98:	DuneMan posted... epik_fail1 posted... I am pretty sure a lot of minorities are annoyed by her racism and think she should be fired. It's pretty sad that they hired that racist, it will fuel alt right idiots and they will use her bigotry against liberalism. She is exactly the reason why center-left people want to be called centrist. There's a simple test for racism in this instance, and it's already been mentioned: replace instances of the word 'white' with 'black', 'Asian', 'hispanic', or other groups and see if you would still support the sentiment expressed. lol --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:906253286] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>DuneMan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>epik_fail1 posted...</cite> <quote>I am pretty sure a lot of minorities are annoyed by her racism and think she should be fired. It's pretty sad that they hired that racist, it will fuel alt right idiots and they will use her bigotry against liberalism. She is exactly the reason why center-left people want to be called centrist.</quote> There's a simple test for racism in this instance, and it's already been mentioned: replace instances of the word 'white' with 'black', 'Asian', 'hispanic', or other groups and see if you would still support the sentiment expressed.</quote> lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gmanthebest 08/04/18 11:47:50 AM #99:	averagejoel posted... DuneMan posted... epik_fail1 posted... I am pretty sure a lot of minorities are annoyed by her racism and think she should be fired. It's pretty sad that they hired that racist, it will fuel alt right idiots and they will use her bigotry against liberalism. She is exactly the reason why center-left people want to be called centrist. There's a simple test for racism in this instance, and it's already been mentioned: replace instances of the word 'white' with 'black', 'Asian', 'hispanic', or other groups and see if you would still support the sentiment expressed. lol Not surprising coming from averagejoke --- What do I feel when I shoot an enemy? Recoil. <cite>gmanthebest posted [p:906253547] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DuneMan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>epik_fail1 posted...</cite> <quote>I am pretty sure a lot of minorities are annoyed by her racism and think she should be fired. It's pretty sad that they hired that racist, it will fuel alt right idiots and they will use her bigotry against liberalism. She is exactly the reason why center-left people want to be called centrist.</quote> There's a simple test for racism in this instance, and it's already been mentioned: replace instances of the word 'white' with 'black', 'Asian', 'hispanic', or other groups and see if you would still support the sentiment expressed.</quote> lol</quote> Not surprising coming from averagejoke</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
andromedadude3 08/04/18 11:50:57 AM #100:	averagejoel posted... ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat The Volga Germans during WWII, bro. --- "You think you do, but you don't." <cite>andromedadude3 posted [p:906253663] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite><quote>ethnic cleansing of white people has never happened and will never happen. it is not a serious threat</quote> The Volga Germans during WWII, bro.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kayoticdreamz 08/04/18 11:58:30 AM #101:	newtonwuzvirgin posted... https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/3/17648566/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-twitter-andrew-sullivan LMAO This is literally an article about why being RACIST isn't RACIST (if its towards white people). How can anyone defend this? Why would anyone expect a white person to get behind this line of thinking? White guilt is stupidly strong White people need to start having pride in themselves <cite>kayoticdreamz posted [p:906253937] in Some dude ... [t:76869617]...</cite> <quote><cite>newtonwuzvirgin posted...</cite> <quote>https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/3/17648566/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-twitter-andrew-sullivan LMAO This is literally an article about why being RACIST isn't RACIST (if its towards white people). How can anyone defend this? Why would anyone expect a white person to get behind this line of thinking?</quote> White guilt is stupidly strong White people need to start having pride in themselves</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 7

Current Events > Some dude on twitter compiled all of Sarah Jeongs racist tweets 2013-2018. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Some dude on twitter compiled all of Sarah Jeongs racist tweets 2013-2018.