Lurker > Muscles

From what I've heard it's really good but I've only heard it from people who's opinion on movies I don't trust at all

I just don't look up the weather, except to see if it'll snow in the winter

Me, every time someone brings up either band

Guns become sentient and start shooting everyone

Almost all my pets I ever had would beg for pets

Couldn't you just say weebs and save some time?

Is it good? How long is it?

I want a show that there's 1 case throughout the show that slowly happens and mostly takes a backseat to that seasons big case until the last season.

Metalsonic66 posted...

Stay hydrated

This is especially important when getting drunk, I got drunk last night to the point of puking but I was hydrated enough where I didn't get a hangover

I thought this was a topic about the delightful children from down the lane

tony1221 posted...

I don't tip because I believe companies should pay their employees more instead of this ancient outdated practice of relying on customers to subsidize their wages with tips.

I'm sure servers everywhere thank you for your contributions of getting them a better wage

BlackScythe0 posted...

What are you doing in 2022 where 3.50 is a reasonable amount for a tip?

Sometimes I tip that at a bar, I don't like keeping a tab open because it's bitten me a few times

Hugs are nice, yes

Limp bizkit, five finger death punch, hair metal

Why are so many people so stupid?

OhhhJa posted...

Could be true. Ive suggested myself that the universe itself may be god. I'm not necessarily attributing an anthropological aspect to a god. It's also possible we live in a simulation. In that case, there would likely be a creator. We still don't understand how the universe came to be from nothing though. I've seen some physics-based hypotheses to how it could happen but nothing proven. We still don't understand the true nature of "nothing."

There was never a nothing though, before the big bang there was all matter in the universe in a state of chaos pretty much, which existed before the universe, what all that matter was doing isn't known though. I like the theory that it was the end of a black hole from another universe.

Not a full shower, I just wash my dick

Correct, I don't wipe liquid shits, I just hop into the shower. same with when I pee.

Jen0125 posted...

Do the men in this topic talking about toilet paper getting stuck to their peehole think that it gets stuck to their butthole every time too? Or do you not wipe that either?

It does get stuck to my butthole when it gets liquidy

Boy bands were never manly

Lokarin posted...

The Beetles were a boyband

Early beetles definitely paved the way for boy bands, but then they started doing drugs and made some experimental rock

agesboy posted...

i mean, i dislike the taste of Caliber less than Taaka, Absolut, Smirnoff, and whatever else in the $15-30~ range i've tried (and no chance in hell i'm gonna spend more than that just to get drunk)

my goal in drinking is just to get drunk, pretty much

If that works for you then ok, but I would spend a bit more to get Crown over Jack or Jim or whatever else

hera posted...

but like seriously when you take a shower you need to wash your penis with soap. if you're uncircumsized you need to peel it back and get in there. just letting the water run down and whatever soap you may or may not have used on whatever part of your body above the waist and expecting it to be "good enough" is not acceptable because it is not good enough.

wash them pee pipes

Why even take a shower if you aren't washing your schlong?

It's got to have drugs in it for that price

I feel like with most alcohol you should go for mid tier, it's worth the price difference from bottom tier.

If it's something I like I can get pulled into it

Who hates on Psycho? It might be the most influential film ever, its at least in the conversation.

ReturnOfFa posted...

Uh no, the topic is about Salman Rushdie getting stabbed. You decided to claim that Muslims do less violence than Christians as a little add-on.

You did discount Christian violence by suggesting that they're mainly concerned with minor things like warning labels. Now, that's kinda discounting Christian violence by omission, so I get it if you're not that aware of it. Maybe you're not aware you do/did this. You should absolutely acknowledge that Christian extremists are just as violent, just as reactive, and just as plentiful (if not way more in the USA) as Islamic extremists.

Yeah, I know that a "joe shmoe Christian" isn't a bad guy, generally. Although, the way Christians vote in America, I could see why people start to see them as 'bad guys'. My mom would probably be dead under the weird Christian influenced abortion laws in many of the US states.

Christians are probably the 2nd worst, besides radical fringe groups which are too plentiful across the world to really count.

Jen0125 posted...

Why do you discount the good that Muslims do through Islam? Is it just because you are Islamophobic?

I never did, there's a lot of good Muslims, there's more good than bad and many of them are upstanding, moral people that make the world a better place.

We all have the same favorite color, my "green" is your "red"

So how do gaslights have a connection to fucking with people's minds? I was always curious about that

ReturnOfFa posted...

How it started:

You brought it up. You started the whataboutism with 'whatabout muslims'.

Then you made this claim:

Like, this stabbing very well could be Islamic violence. But it's objectively hilarious that a former Christian would take the opportunity to minimize Christian violence this hard. Like bruh, I just posted a 3 hour compilation of Christian violence that definitely isn't 'just bitching about warning labels' lmfao

The topic is about Muslim violence towards an author so I'm not sure how that's whataboutism. And for the 2nd part, just because I'm a former Christian that thinks they do a lot of stupid things and hold stupid beliefs doesn't mean I discount the good they do. Your general Joe shmoe Christian isn't a bad guy in my experience. It's when you start getting into televangelists and big corrupt churches that problems arise.

BlackScythe0 posted...

I don't think it's "one upping" to ask Muscles why someone would try "You shouldn't be upset about this group of bad people because there is a worse group of people"

I'm not saying you shouldn't be upset by the bad things Christianity does, it's part of the reason why I'm not a Christian anymore, I'm not the one that brought up Christianity though, I wasn't comparing them until people came along with their whataboutism

Jen0125 posted...

I thought Christians just wanted to enact censorship? Make up your mind.

I never contradicted myself, as far as media/art goes, Christians want to ban or put warning labels on things they find blasphemous, Muslims straight up want to kill the creators. Islam is just as bad if not worse than Christianity in all other regards too.

Christianity does a lot of terrible things, Islam is still worse though

Are you really trying to claim Christianity treats women worse than Islam?

Pistachios > almonds > peanuts > cashews

I wish I could have them again

Killing artists is worse than whatever stupid whining Christians do, they just want to bitch and put warning labels on art in modern times (still stupid censorship but not as bad as literally killing them or threatening to)

ReturnOfFa posted...

"Your father killed my father!"

"Wasn't me!" -Rev

"Well, can you admit it was your father?"

"Who cares, it wasn't me!" -Rev

I know you'll point to this as an oversimplification, but can you at least see how that would come across as a form of denial? Or at least just being a bit of an ass?

Like I said, my family arrived in Canada only during the last 3 generations of my family. They didn't murder or steal Native babies, but they...didn't care that this happened, and badmouthed Natives as lazy alcoholics when children were literally still being forcibly removed from their families. Then...sexually assaulted in many cases. Yeah, I didn't do those things, but I'm not going to be like 'WHOA WHOA, LEAVE ME OUT OF THIS' when discussing it with Native friends. That'd be a fucking dick move.

Same with the whole 'WHOA WHOA, I DIDN'T ENSLAVE YOUR GRANDPA' vibe. Yeah...we know buddy. Sounds like you don't give a shit though, and it sounds like your semi-recently arrived European family didn't give a shit either lmao. That's honestly the funniest shit. Recent immigrants not giving a shit about American history or even being racist.

You can say what your ancestors did was wrong without feeling guilty about it at the same time. You shouldn't feel pride or shame about your race, you didn't choose that. I'm sure my ancestors did terrible things, I feel terrible that they happened, but I don't even have a connection to my lineage past my great grand parents who died when I was 11.

VampireCoyote posted...

literally christians

The episodes of South Park that talk about Muhammad are all banned but the Jesus ones are all still there...

Is any group as sensitive as Islam? It's like they don't understand the concept of just not reading/watching/listening to something you don't like

Metalsonic66 posted...

Actually super easy; barely an inconvenience.

Obscure references are tight

I have some memories that had to have happened before that but generally no

ReturnOfFa posted...

See, I can't place all those things in those categories like you. A lot of 'anti-woke' people are Christians that are also into banning "offensive" music. All of the 'woke' and 'non-woke' labelling makes little sense. I agree with your first bit that too many things are labeled as woke, but then you proceed to label a bunch of things. Not saying those labels aren't mostly 90% accurate, but there's a lot of gray area for all of them, so it almost seems contradictory for you to suggest 'too many labels' and then label things.

I'll also point out that an 'anti-woke' Conservative may claim to be accepting of other races/sexualities/genders and then actively vote against their interests, or even against the interests of that Conservative; I'd use banning trans people in the military as an example. So ultimately, the 'anti-woke' label really doesn't matter, and neither do their claims.

Censorship from the religious right is just as bad as censorship from the woke liberals, I listen to Rock and Metal music so I know of their stupid bs in that regard. I also know that there are people out there that only claim to be accepting but actually aren't, that doesn't mean there aren't plenty of good people out there that do actually accept others without buying into the woke cancel culture.

ReturnOfFa posted...

"Woke" really is just a scary trigger-word here. Sorry, but society has been pushing towards "woke" for decades, especially in places like the workplace. It's simply more efficient in the workplace when people are discouraged from 'joking around' using race/sexuality/gender. You're likely right that a it's a vocal minority that actually identify as 'woke'. However, I think without the buzzword, the majority of people will end up agreeing with general values of 'being woke' - ie respecting people in the workplace, recognizing structural oppression, blah blah blah.

Hope nobody is construing this as an argument, I think it's just a good discussion.

There is a big difference between that and wanting to cancel Dave Chapelle for some Trans jokes or other "offensive" media. And I think it is a good discussion as well.

adjl posted...

Nobody actually uses the word "woke" unironically except to complain about women in their video games, though. Again, however you want to define the word, it's come to be used to describe pretty much any examples of a pro-diversity message in media, almost exclusively by people who want zero pro-diversity messages in their media.

When I think woke I think of some snotty college kid protesting a comedian or a keyboard warrior trying to push a narrative of white guilt or race/gender swapping for no reason.

adjl posted...

You're welcome to think that, but you're going to find that you have difficulty communicating on the matter if you use that definition because it doesn't line up very well with how everyone else is using the word. When things are called "woke," it's overwhelmingly because they include diversity or are otherwise more politically correct than the speaker wants them to be, usually with little regard for whether or not it's a genuine example of tokenism making for a less enjoyable piece of media. Attempting to censor offensive content can fall under that umbrella, but it's a very small piece of the overall picture and isn't nearly as common as the anti-PC pearl clutchers like to think it is (outside of stuff that's offensive for the sake of being malicious, in which case it's not being called out for being offensive, it's called out for being malicious).

A lot of people are accepting of other races/sexualities/genders without being woke, I think it could easily be argued that more people accepting of diversity aren't woke than are given the fact that woke people are a vocal minority. Just because you aren't a bigoted piece of shit doesn't mean you are automatically woke.

It's really cheaper to build a computer? I assumed it would be more expensive but better quality

I'm surprised he had a big dick given how try hard he is, I assumed he was overcompensating for something

DirtBasedSoap posted...

my mom forced me to eat in the bathroom growing up so yeah this definitely checks out

Funny, I was forced to shit in the dining room

ReturnOfFa posted...

Like I said, I personally find the claim that 'the woke crowd' are looking to eliminate all offensive things to be incorrect or at the very best overinflated.

I think too many things are labeled as woke tbh, being accepting of gay people is not woke, being accepting of Trans people is not woke, wanting to silence comedians is woke, wanting to get rid of "offensive" movies/music/whatever is woke.

adjl posted...

I'm guessing he's going for "the only reason offensive movies/comedy exist for you to see if you want is because of the anti-wokists you think are dangerous." That's obviously not true, since you can very easily produce offensive material without losing your mind over the existence of a gay protagonist, but I'm pretty sure that's the logic.

More like "the woke crowd wants to get rid of offensive things, so if you let them take over they would get rid of said offensive things you enjoy"

Red = pink > yellow > orange