Lurker > Corrik7

Kirby321 posted...

Corrik, did your N1 PM explicitly say that you roleblocked Blade?

I sent my action. Is that what you are asking.

Again. I can't guarantee Blade is scum. In fact with the jailkeep explanation out there for no death it might not even be likely. All I can confirm is that he is lying by saying he knows for sure he wasn't roleblocked.

He is either town trying to draw a shot or some other entity lying. But he is lying.

Let's say the scenario that somehow my action didn't work on him and he got results as a cop or such. He wouldn't have said that in the topic and had scum know that.

He is lying. You determine as what side.

I do believe Chang needs to make this decision on his own today. I withdraw any and all advice in the matter. I know I would be getting all the information I wanted though if I had a host confirmed Day vig that ends the day as well.

TotallyNotMI posted...

Reminder that Corrik hasn't actually claimed and only claimed an action - since he's saying he has no problem with Kirby's claim co-existing with his, it seems he isn't claiming a full time roleblocker.

I claimed my flavor.

I like blades and wallz posts more looking back at more of day 1. However, Blade's seem sneaky at times as well. First he calls itzknight a scum distraction. Then likely bad town. Then "If scum chang is scum too". It's like a spectrum and somewhat hedged.

Kirby321 posted...

Corrik, why did you choose to roleblock Blade N1?

He kept saying itsknight was a distraction by scum. And ended up being you know a powerful scum. Seems like indirect defense.

wallmasterz posted... I am concerned with finding town, not getting town points. Ulti called me specifically out for not immediately gunning for him (his reasoning was flawed, but nonetheless) and Lopen was tunneling/tunneling Ulti nonstop. Lopen claimed to think I was town. There are reasons I chimed in on Ulti which you neglected to mention.

Ulti usually gets town cleared too easily. I have never fallen into that trap. In Simpsons mafia I was right about Ulti being scum on d2 after I neighbored him but I got talked out of it. I am not saying Im a perfect read on Ulti, but I dont think Ive ever wrongly town cleared him. Usually I suspect the crap out of him until one of us is in the grave. Ulti is so conditioned for this he suspected me for not suspecting him before he even posted

Chang, do you have any town reads besides apparently Ulti? Scum reads? Other people have stated reasons for suspecting me. Some of those reasons are silly but they felt genuine. This post feels like a launching point for you to jump on the mislynch wallz bandwagon if it suits you.

This is the post I didn't like and why I voted him yesterday though. Specifically the bolded part.

Going back, I think I no longer dislike wallz day 1 post. I misread it methinks lol.

The most scummy things I have seen this game are a post wallz made day 1 and a post blade made day 1. Both are single messages that don't read well to me. Blade's moreso in hindsight.

I didn't read most of day 1 and parts of day 2 though. So *shrug*

Obellisk posted...

page 1 I was talking to lopen, and then blade called me scum for it.

Is that scumhunting?

Meow1000 posted...

This post only goes to show how completely worthless your opinion is when it comes to me given I predate her here by a decade and have been openly scum hunting while you've been almost entirely inactive.

Have you been scumhunting?

You keep saying to lynch me today cuz I blew your shit up.
Yesterday you said the lynch on Itzknight was just a scum distraction and tried to downplay that lynch without actively straight out saying so.
Your wallz vote was is good only if he is scum, and lets be honest, way late in the scheme of things. I was way ahead on that vote. Didn't seem like you even really tried to make that lynch move much as well.

So what exactly scumhunting have you done?

changmas posted...

You should be happy Corrik. Your game just got much easier; you only have to convince one person to kill Blade now.

I wish you had the marbles to kill him. He isn't gonna claim cuz he doesn't respect you as a person and feel like you would do anything about it.

I cannot assure he is scum, but I can assure he is lying about knowing defintiively he was not roleblocked.

The only town motivation here would be to try and draw a shot onto himself, but it really doesn't appear that's what he is going for here.

I can assure you everything I said is legit.

So do with it as you want. But, I wouldn't waste time on Blade cuz he has zero respect for you to do anything you might request. Shoot or move on.

Wallz seems like rolled over scum to me personally.

changmas posted...

Anyways, here's where I sit right now

Town
1. Ben
3. Chang
8. IGCD
13. Red
14. Sbell
15. Mzero (Replaced Taco)
16. Ulti

Town but didn't like my video
12. Peaf

Town but a known busser
5. Ctes

idk yet
6. Death
9. Isquen
7. FD
10. Kirby

idk yet but didn't like my video
2. Blade

sus
4. Corrik
11. MI
17. Wallz

So disappointing you had the power to force what you wanted and pressure around. And you instead let almost everyone off the hook.

htaeD posted...

He still had a chance to walk it back then, but he didnt.

He was pot committed at that point. He has a chance to walk it back now. He continues to lie about it.

htaeD posted...

Blade could easily just claim a nonmoving role if he feared town believing Corriks actions.
Instead he maintains he was not blocked and broke the chance to coexist with Corrik
If Blade is lying, he made it into a 1 for 1.
If Corrik is lying, he made it into a 1 for 1.

Blade didn't know it was uninformed. He thought his action went through so I was clearly gambiting.

Kirby321 posted...

How does that work if, for example, Blade is Cop?

How can he be uninformed that he was roleblocked if he doesn't get told that his scan failed? Because if the scan didn't fail, he'd get a result and thus wasn't roleblocked.

That seems paradoxical.

Just wouldn't get a return pm with results. Not too complicated. I'm not the host tho.

PeaceFrog posted...

Corrik, i don't understand how you think you as town rb can coexist with Kirby.

I'm not concerned with that. Thus you shouldn't be either. Trust me.

Meow1000 posted...

I asked why

People said "I don't know it seemed random"

I always believe everything I read on Facebook or hear from others also. I completely understand.

That said, stop lying if you are not scum. Your lies would have got you killed if not for Kirbys claim and wallz shitty ass claim today if you are actually town.

Meow1000 posted...

Corrik randomly dayvigged IGCD for no reason anyone can figure out how would this be remotely comparable.

Discrediting play in a game you weren't even in.

I had my reasons.

htaeD posted...

I mean, if he moved, he was not roleblocked.

Again. He was roleblocked. He doesn't get informed of being roleblocked. Nothing changes that he is lying about having a result that supposedly confirms he wasn't roleblocked.

htaeD posted...

But you cant be serious about thinking Blade could be SK

I'm not sure what Blade is but he is lying. The jailkeep leaves potential I didn't block his kill but it doesn't change the fact he is lying regarding his supposed result confirming he wasn't roleblocked.

htaeD posted...

Lol now you are just kidding around.
Werent you against leashing Ctes last game?

Ctes was confirmed SK. I joked about leasing hum actually. And we didn't have a likely scum also.

Meow1000 posted...

I have no reason to claim because someone who hasn't played a remotely townlike game and now essentially just got counterclaimed is sticking to a claim against me that we all know at this point is BS.

What i have said is completely true. Also, you are acting like you didn't essentially claim if you were town already. You soft claimed supposedly town power role that you get confirmation of your action supposedly.

It's just enough to keep the pitchfork off your back and refuse to actually claim. It's a carrot for town. Don't lynch me cuz hehehe I'm a mysterious power!

Then also in the same regard saying you refuse to claim because you don't need to claim as if it's some town righteous decision, when if you were town, you already claimed enough for scum.

Your defense here is trash and circular.

It's a good question. You make Blade have to pidgeonhole his fake claim now so that he can't make it try and fit later when more roles are revealed.

htaeD posted...

Also once again I dont buy that you are willing to let Blade get away

Blade could be sk.

htaeD posted...

A scumroleblocker is always in the game
2 town roleblockers are not

Not always but usually, but he is a roleblocking rolecop. Not a roleblocker alone. I see potential for more on that scum team.

htaeD posted...

A. I dont think you are that easy of faith
B. He claimed a role that clashes with your supposed role.

The only flip is a roleblocker. Kirby is claiming jailkeeper. I have my role. Someone else is claiming a taunted or some crap. So far seems a game heavy on role prevention/ direction.

Not worried about Kirby.

I do have a question for Kirby. Kirby did you jailkeep him with the intention of saving or blocking him and why

htaeD posted...

Corrik, why do you seem to believe Kirby?

Told you Kirby is town yesterday. If he is town, why wouldn't I believe him?