Lurker > bigblu89

I can imagine it.

And I did live at home at the time.

Granted, I was 17, and was able to live on the 120-something dollars I made weekly at the time, because I was still in High School.

Meh.

She was, at best, the 5th hottest girl that was in Pitch Perfect.

6th if you're a chubby chaser.

knightmarexx posted...

Wouldn't Oedipus have done that? (And Oedipus complex is not an apt name, as in the story - Oedipus doesn't know he's marrying his mother, just that she's a MILF, it's only later on that he finds out she's his mother)

I'm not talking about the concept of finding older women attractive, which has probably been around since the dawn of man. I'm talking about the ACTUAL term "MILF", which seems to originate in the 1990's.

Linguist Laurel A. Sutton states that MILF was one of 9 terms for "attractive women" collected from undergraduates at a large linguistics class at Berkeley in the spring of 1992. Stereotypical users would be "college students from East Contra Costa, California". The term was widely popularized by the film American Pie (1999), where John Cho's character (simply credited as 'MILF Guy No. 2') used the term to refer to Jennifer Coolidge's character Jeanine Stifler

Kolibri X posted...

Republicans are at least realistic enough to know we can't "beat" covid. That's why we've been saying we need to learn to live with it for the past 2 years. That impossible promise was made by Biden/Democrats. It's a reminder that he makes promises he can't possibly keep and how dim people are to think he's a competent, straight talking, leader.

Politicians making promises they had zero intentions to keep, and people believing it, isn't something that was invented in 2020.

God, it's killing me that you guys are making me defend Joe Biden.

1337toothbrush posted...

Joe claimed he'd bring everything back to normal. Funny how democrats scream about Bernie promising unicorns and lollipops, but apparently when they do it then it's okay.

I'm no Biden fan, at all, but when you try to pass mask or vaccine legislation, and it gets blocked by a right-leaning Supreme Court, hell bent on making you an "Accomplished nothing" President, it's kinda hard to get things "back to normal".

Although, sadly, the US Government working AGAINST the President and not WITH him is pretty "back to normal" if you ask me.

Scotty_Rogers posted...

@bigblu89 Obviously the "older woman" fetish did not start with some random movie lol

Obviously, but the American Pie movie coined the term MILF.

Or at least introduced it to the masses.

modena posted...

Man I've seen some hot ass women in their 50s. To me 60s is to old for me currently.

I feel the same, at least until Salma Hayek turns 60.

That woman can be 80 and Ill still find her attractive.

At it's inception (assuming you're of the belief that the term originated in the first American Pie movie) the term "Milf" came from the concept of boys/men that were attracted to their friend's mom.

So, unless they had them at a very young age, girls in their 20's and 30's really weren't int h eoriginal Milf category.

Like, a girl that's 22 with a newborn really isn't a Milf.

So, I support the 38-48 age range as prime Milf territory.

BuckVanHammer posted...

adam sandler

This.

Any "Netflix Exclusive" Sandler movie, save for Hubie Halloween, which was decent, is really rough to get through.

StarDestroyer posted...

What goes on in the mind of someone that purchases this shit?

My guess is the price point (he was selling them for $3), with the gamble that a story like this goes viral and they can then sell it for a profit.

Ted's life was the absolute worst.

Except for that one season where he was banging that pastry chef.

God Damn she was hot.

No.

If I did, I was asymptomatic.

Thank you Pfizer.

God, you can almost smell the frosted tips and wraparound Oakleys.

Some people say you know they can't believe. Jamaica we have a bobsled team.

Get on up!

AloneIBreak posted...

Cowboys fan here. I really dont know why were hated so much at this point. Its not like the team has been successful and I dont see how our fans are any worse than anyone else. Steelers fans are insufferable, but nobody cares about them outside of their division. People hate the Patriots almost as much as the Cowboys, but the Patriots have at least been relevant for the last couple of decades-ish.

People tend to lump an entire fanbase on the worst section of said fanbase.

And for the most part, the worst section of the Dallas fanbase is BY FAR the most obnoxious.

They're even obnoxious about how much they are hated. The whole "The world can't keep the 'D' out of their mouth".

And what compounds it is that fact that, unlike a team like Pittsburgh or New England, they haven't won anything in close to 30 years, but puff their chests out like they win it all every year.

No.

The Patrick Ewing-Era Knicks probably win a title if Jordan goes to Portland, and as a lifelong Nets fan, I would not have been able to stomach that back in my elementary/high school days.

Easily.

Ringer on the lowest volume, while in a pocket, is basically silent, and my phone rings maybe once a week.

Southernfatman posted...

Basically every popular classic rock song. I still love it, but they need to vary it up a little. Some B-sides won't hurt.

For real. The station that plays "60-80's Classic Rock" can't flip the record over from time to time?

You got 30 years of music to chose from, do you have tp play the same 3 Led Zepplin songs every day?

Walking in Memphis.

We call it the "Multi-Vitamin Song" at work because we hear it daily.

3/10. I just make the cut.

I think we're officially at the point in the show where it needs to go into full on "Fast & Furious" mode, where it becomes so over the top that it becomes a "so bad it's good" kind of show.

A storyline where Johnny and Miguel take down an entire Mexican cartel would be an excellent start.

I think we're officially at the point in the show where it needs to go into full on "Fast & Furious" mode, where it becomes so over the top that it becomes a "so bad it's good" kind of show.

A storyline where Johnny and Miguel take down an entire Mexican cartel would be an excellent start.

Nemu posted...

The idea of there being a cutoff point is silly. If the means by which someone is accumulating money is immoral, then it is going to be immoral regardless of being a millionaire or billionaire. Some arbitrary cutoff just means theyll better learn how to disperse their assets so as to appear under the cutoff point .

That's exactly what would end up happening.

Wealth would just get transferred to a trusted source, creating two "threshold
billionaires instead of two.

nfearurspecimn posted...

Sports isn't bad, but why invest so much of yourself emotionally in something that is entirely out of your control? Just seems foolish to me.

Then I assume you don't watch TV, Movies, listen to music, etc.?

Ivany2008 posted...

The point wasn't the number. The point is that there should be a cutoff but I don't think having a single billion dollars should be it. There are things that high amounts of money are required to buy to run a company.

I know. I was making the same point.

Who's to decide how much wealth is "too much wealth"?

To some people, making $200k a year seems excessive.

So it's one of those things where if they decide $40 billion in wealth is too much, someone will then say it should actually be $35, then $30, etc etc.

Ivany2008 posted...

The question shouldn't be "Should Billionaires Exist", but rather "Should Billionaires Exist who have more than 40 Billion Dollars". There are those billionaires that work hard for their money, and as such should be allowed to enjoy the fruits of their labor. Past that its a bit much, and all extra money should be going back to paying off the national debt.

Why 40 though? Why not 39? 35? 30?

Who decides the number?

So what happens when someone's net worth is $999,999,999.99?

Does the government just take whatever "worth" they gain beyond that?

And how does the government then transfer that "worth" to someone poorer, especially if it's not liquid?

Handing a poor person 5 shares of Apple stock doesn't really help them pay the rent.

You have, but it's not as simple as it being "solve for x" in real life.

Even something as simple as splitting the remaining balance of a bill after half the people have already paid is a "solve for x" equation.

That being said, all math is just a more complicated versions of the simple add/subtract/multiply/divide you had on lock by 4th grade.

Just like every class you take after you learn how to read is all just various stages of reading comprehension classes.

1158/1149

99.22%

I probably panic, and hope the commotion doesn't wake up my wife.

monkmith posted...

a shit business that deserved to have its reputation dragged through the mud, wasn't illegal though. companies have the right to refuse service, if you hate that just remember that the same right got this asshole off twitter.

https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump

Yup.

As someone who worked 25-30 hours a week while going college full time, I'm always conflicted when I see this topic come up.

Part of me feels bad that many of these kids got themselves into a situation they have no idea then were getting themselves into, and the other part of me is of the thought of "How could you be so dumb as to get yourself into this situation?".

This in no way a brag or anything, but I (probably) could've went to any school I wanted to (I was accepted to Syracuse, PSU, Seton Hall, and St. John's), but when push came to shove, it came down to going to the best school(s) I could afford. I went to community college for 2 years, then I went to the local State University for another 2.5 years.

Unless you're going for a very specific job out there, half of the job application just want you to have that degree. Doesn't even matter what it's in. In the sales department where I work, the 6 sales people all have degrees. Not a single one of them has a business degree. 3 teaching degrees, one Art Major, and two Liberal Arts majors.

The new TMNT arcade-style game.

I believe it's called Shredder's Revenge.

NeonCthulhu posted...

I wish there was a clip that was rendered higher than 2p >_>

Yup. That's the one.

I may have to break out the DVD an rewatch that scene when I get home.

You know, for historical purposes.

He did.

And then I turned 18 and got some.

Squall28 posted...

I just don't like how he ranked calories first. I'm on the same page on everything being important, but don't think calories should get the special distinction of being number 1 because there are so many who calorie counting with junk food and starving themselves. If you eliminate the crap from your diet, the calories will regulate itself. Replacing sugary drinks with water for example easily cuts down on like 300+ calories a day and it won't make you hungry.

Read the post right before yours. Calorie intake IS the most important, but counting calories on day 1 isn't as ideal as making sure you're eating the right kinds of food.

--Zero- posted...

Next variant might be vaccine resistant too. Realistically even the people that are pro vax are not going to keep getting vaccines 2-3 times a year.

Why not?

If I can go to the dentist every 6 months to make sure my teeth are healthy, I see no reason why I can't go to my local CVS and get a vaccine every 6 months.

Heartbreakers was peak JLH.

There's a deleted scene where the majority of it is her having a conversation while running on a treadmill in a sports bra.

How she didn't win an Oscar for that performance, I'll never know.

Any particular type of food, as with anything in life, should be enjoyed in moderation.

Combine that with even the slightest bit of exercise, even something as little as a daily half-hour walk around your neighborhood, would keep a majority of people living a relatively healthy lifestyle.

Because many (I'd hazard to say the majority) hold humans in a higher regard than animals.

And they believe a food chain exists.

uwnim posted...

Yes, it will infect a large majority of the population. No, I am not worried.

This.

I'm vaxxed, boosted, and in relatively good health for my age.

I trust the science. So even if I were to get Covid, I'm confident that my symptoms will be mild, and I'll come out of it just fine.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Point I was trying to make is that if this person doesn't have a cell phone, they most likely have whatever amenities predate the cell phone, as far as communication is concerned.

A home phone with an answering machine/voicemail, a work phone, etc.

The argument wasn't about how easy cellphones make current living, it's that a person that was never overly reliant on one can still live easily without one.

I'm an old man by today's standards, so I'm not up on the lingo, but is this what it means when the kids say that someone is a Simp?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

They are essential, but not required.

You can easily go a day, a few days, even a whole week+ without your cell phone.

It obviously makes things easier, but not having one doesn't make certain things impossible.

For example, printing out directions, while not ideal, is still an option. So is using a map.

Walking to a place an asking to use the phone is still an option should your car break down. Inconvenient? Obviously.

Cell phones have made things easier, no doubt. But they aren't a necessity.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Dunno, we were able to do it for the hundreds of years we were around before cell phones became a thing.

I got all the way to my MID TWENTIES (!!!) without a cell phone.

I know. Crazy.

I would. Simply out of curiosity.