Lurker > joe40001

Ivanka is hot though.

Her and AoC would make for a hella hot catfight angry lesbian sex scene.

Would bring all of american mankind together in support.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

PBusted posted...

Andrew Jackson: "So, founding fathers, about this first amendment, it's mostly about shouting racial slurs, right?"

George Washington: "No, I mean racial slurs is allowed, but the spirit of free speech is sharing thoughts and ideas, growing wiser by vigorous open debate and not suppressing people's ability to communicate their thoughts and views on the world"

Andrew Jackson: "Yeah, but like literally that matters 0% without the racial slurs, am I right?"

George Washington: "No, open debate and discussion of ideas is largely the main part of freedom of speech, yes it allows for slurs but that's not really why we hold it in such high esteem."

Andrew Jackson: "Yeah but without being able to blame minorities for crimes it's basically pointless, am I right?"

George Washington: "Go home, Andrew Jackson, you're drunk."

You think twitter is censoring racial slurs and nothing else?

They are censoring taboo conversations that yes might involve race, and yes that is exactly the kind of thing that all the founding fathers would have recognized as important not to censor.

Trying to replace it doesn't work. If twitter only censored racial slurs and nothing else you might have an argument but that is incredibly obviously not true.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

ArmieBuff posted...

You go on about bad faith arguments and being reasonable yet here you are resorting to strawman argument shitposts. How many times does it need to be drilled in your head that porn is a part of free speech?
This strawman can easily be applied against you.
"This is a free speech site that doesn't allow bigotry"
"LGBT are mentally ill"
"You can't post bigotry."
"Freeze Peach!"

Your olive garden analogy can also apply to every site.

Even twitter doesn't think it's a free speech site.

The most important part of free speech, or at the very least the part Gettr is focused on is the open sharing of ideas thoughts and arguments, and since they are perfectly consistent with that you have no argument.

Freedom of speech as an ideal is mostly about debate, thought, and open discussion. Not about porn. Porn is covered, but it's not the thing that makes it super important to a functioning society, and clearly isn't the part Gettr is making the focus of their site.

It's not a porn site, in all other capacities it is a free speech site.

Twitter can't even say that, they have inconsistent rules and ban people arbitrarily. Twitter doesn't even try to be free speech, they are just "semi-open discussion but we can ban even true things if we want to."

Free speech is not about sonic porn. Or at least the free speech that matters to society.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

teep_ posted...

Well, considering I'm likely to be right and the people calling me dumb are looking more and more likely to be wrong, I think you got your graph backwards.

Unless it's a graph of correctness vs smug gatekeeping, and if so DR should be on the far right but with low correctness.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Andrew Jackson: "So, founding fathers, about this first amendment, it's mostly about sonic porn, right?"

George Washington: "No, I mean porn is ok, but the spirit of free speech is sharing thoughts and ideas, growing wiser by vigorous open debate and not suppressing people's ability to communicate their thoughts and views on the world"

Andrew Jackson: "Yeah, but like literally that matters 0% without the sonic porn, am I right?"

George Washington: "No, open debate and discussion of ideas is largely the main part of freedom of speech, yes it allows for porn but that's not really why we hold it in such high esteem."

Andrew Jackson: "Yeah but without Sonic's dick in Knuckles's ass it's basically pointless, am I right?"

George Washington: "Go home, Andrew Jackson, you're drunk."

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

"This is a free speech site that doesn't allow porn"

"I'm posting sonic porn"

"You can't post porn"

"WeLl ThEn ItS nOt ReAlLy FrEe SpEeCh"

---

"Welcome to the Olive Garden where we offer unlimited breadsticks"

"I want 10 billion breadsticks"

"You can't have 10 billion breadsticks"

"WeLl ThEn ItS nOt ReAlLy UnLiMiTeD bReAdStIcKs"

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Smashingpmkns posted...

Lmao

"This is no limit poker you can bet as much as you want"

"I bet my wife"

"You can't bet your wife"

"WeLl ThEn ItS nOt ReAlLy No LiMiT"

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

It's bullshit they let him out of prison.

Meanwhile people are in prison longer for marajuana.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

ArmieBuff posted...

Sure, and then that strips them of their alleged free speech status.

Like I said, you're the only one who thinks this. Porn is speech. Porn is an idea. If you're going to gatekeep, then people can just claim the stuff they don't like isn't "real" speech too. If you tell anyone who actually believes in true free speech that there's a site that's about free speech but censors porn they'd say "oh, that's not free speech then".

"They are not pro free speech in the absolutist sense, they are pro free speech when it comes to the sharing of ideas, or alternatively they are pro free speech but not a place for pornography."

Society isn't struggling for places to share porn without censorship, we are struggling for places to share ideas without censorship.

This is so painfully obvious what they are talking about. It's a place where you can say the ideas you can't say on twitter, not a place for porn.

How many more times do I have to explain this very simple concept?

"They are not pro free speech in the absolutist sense, they are pro free speech when it comes to the sharing of ideas, or alternatively they are pro free speech but not a place for pornography."

"It's an all you can eat buffet, but they have a limited amount of fish"

"WeLl ThEn ItS nOt ReAlLy AlL yOu CaN eAt"

You fucking damn well know what they mean.

They are talking about free speech as an ideal when it comes to sharing arguments, thoughts, and views not for sharing porn. There are plenty of other places for sharing porn. So long as they never censor thoughts, ideas, or arguments then they are sticking to their founding principles.

If you NEEEEEEEEEEEEEED to call that "not at all free speech" call it "free speech lite" or whatever gets you off, but it's super duper fucking crystal as crystal can be clear what they are talking about and at this point I'm sick of the trolling.

They are free speech for everything but porn PERIOD

Stop being willfully obtuse and pedantic.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Smashingpmkns posted...

They clearly advertise themselves as a "free speech" version of Twitter. Everyone has pointed this out and for some reason you can't grasp how censoring pornography is the opposite of what they're claiming to be. This has been 6 pages of sealioning lol

I've said it tons of times

They are saying "free speech version of twitter" that means "not banning ideas we don't like", porn is not nor was it ever part of their pitch.

Everybody pretending sonic porn is what they were always talking about is being obtuse and pedantic.

"They are not pro free speech in the absolutist sense, they are pro free speech when it comes to the sharing of ideas, or alternatively they are pro free speech but not a place for pornography."

It's crystal fucking clear what they are talking about. Twitter is banning certain ideas from being discussed, this is an alternative to that, that is the important element, that is the "free speech" element.

Anybody who still isn't getting that is being dense or trolling.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Yes but not at work, just in public places like grocery stores.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

UnholyMudcrab posted...

I can forgive someone who got suckered into voting for Trump the first time but realized their mistake, but there just aren't very many of those people. The ones who voted for him even after 4 years of his defiling of the office of the presidency just aren't deserving of any of my sympathy or understanding.

If the DNC didn't bungle up so much and seem corrupt and suppress people like Bernie and Yang I'd be inclined to agree.

I do agree that second term Trump voters are less defensible than only first term Trump voters, but let's not pretend like the DNC is a bastion of unimpeachable integrity.

That said, after Yang and maybe Bernie, Biden was my favorite person running.

It's still largely a gaslighting thing, Obama put it well: "If I watched Fox News all day, I'd hate me too"

These people need to be better, but I still reserve sympathy for them and hope they can be brought to the light side (which btw isn't the democratic side but the side of critical thinking and kindness).

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Tyranthraxus posted...

They are not "pro free speech" at all. They are (claim) to be anti-censorship, which is often synonymous with free speech, but then they ended up having more censorship than their primary competing platform which they claim has too much censorship.

And the "other guy's censorship" amounts to banning one guy who used Twitter to foment an insurrection at the capitol.

Twitter has banned sooooooooooo many people over bullshit.

And yeah, if you are limiting yourself to discussion of ideas and not content sharing they are more free speech.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


I do to, but if we are doing this thing of "companies decide what's on their platform" then they can set rules.

I think it's pretty clear what free discussion of ideas without censorship means. I don't understand everybody being obtuse about not understanding how porn is different.

As I said before:
"They are not pro free speech in the absolutist sense, they are pro free speech when it comes to the sharing of ideas, or alternatively they are pro free speech but not a place for pornography."

It's really simple, really clear. Free open sharing of all ideas, not a place for porn. That's different than twitter in a clear way.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

*Wi

but yes, funny

I'm surprised conan got naked in public, usually they do fake nude underwear. I wonder if they did that here.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

I don't even like guns so I'm not going to touch this beyond saying in theory there are justifications, but IMO the costs outweigh the benefits.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

ArmieBuff posted...

You're the only one who thinks this is something separate.

Pretty much everybody here defends twitter with this "a company has every right to choose what content it allows".

It makes no sense that people are doing this about face on it in this context.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Korean girls tho...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ft9sVTFOKic

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Seems prudent.

There is no reason to be on non-anonymous online social media.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

I4NRulez posted...

why dont you research stuff before you whine then.

The students said some of them had voiced their concern to Patton during his lecture, but that hed used the word in following class sections anyway. They also said theyd reached out to fellow Chinese students, who confirmed that the pronunciation of this word is much different than what Professor Patton described in class. The word is most commonly used with a pause in between both syllables."

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/09/08/professor-suspended-saying-chinese-word-sounds-english-slur

Students voicing concern is irrelevant. Some people pronouncing it differently isn't proof he's pronouncing it wrong. I've heard linguists use it and they don't have a pause in there.

And, most importantly, at the end of the day he was clearly saying the Chinese word and not the offensive term, so all of this is irrelevant.

A series of noises isn't offensive, only associated meanings. This person was saying the Chinese word, and so there is nothing wrong with that.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Tmaster148 posted...

Some people really hate free speech so much, they can't help but make themselves look like an idiot for days now.

I'm very pro-free speech.

This isn't really a pedantic free speech discussion anymore, as I've said like 6 times now:
"They are not pro free speech in the absolutist sense, they are pro free speech when it comes to the sharing of ideas, or alternatively they are pro free speech but not a place for pornography."

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

MrMallard posted...

By that logic, most media is about as important as porn. If Snow White or The Little Mermaid were brought up in a court of law and were relevant to the case, any discussion of them or as to their merit would be about them, rather than those things being the argument itself. Ergo, they have as much merit in this context as porn.

That's no yardstick to measure the worth of a piece of media.

It's a yardstick to measure something's worth as an argument. And yes in that context clips not presenting an argument would be equally not an argument to porn.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Tyranthraxus posted...

First of all this is a dumb take because a court case is going to have 2 opposing sides and obviously one side isn't going to show any porn at all and the pro porn side still has to respond to claims made by the anti porn side.

Claims about porn, not porn as a claim itself. Porn itself is not a claim.

Secondly this is dumb because Twitter isn't a court

Ok, but courts and lectures and discussion halls are apt comparisons for places of discussion. And so porn without commentary wouldn't be accepted there.

Third this is dumb because Twitter does allow porn, yes even sonic porn.

Not everywhere, and I think it's fairly clear what this site's goal is. Free discussion, not free porn sharing.

Fourth, these two cases were essentially just porn presentations where the other side's only real arguments is that they shouldn't be allowed to do that because muh puritanism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_v._California

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell

Those are cases about porn. The porn itself wasn't the argument but the discussion of it.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

cjsdowg posted...

Sorry Joe, but they are bad people. The Democrats for the most part of doing things that will help them. However because these things will also help minorities they don't want it. Trump was business man known for scamming people and they still supported him.

Look at Mitch saying what the dems past will help them. But he didn't vote for them. Why are these people outraged . Because they know that Dems will always be there to save them. And they can use Republicans to hurt minorities.

https://twitter.com/grantstern/status/1412532820707364865

Look at that. How dare these people ever say a horrible thing about dems. They are not gaslite. They pick hate over food .

Oh no, Mitch McConnell very well could be one of the most evil people in America.

I'm talking about normal American trump voters. More of them are gaslit than evil.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

PBusted posted...

Not without context. And so has porn.

Um yeah they have.

The basis of court cases have been "conspiracy theories". Where the whole case is arguing the conspiracy theory.

There has never been a court case were the whole case was just showing porn.

You are confusing commentary or analysis of porn (which are arguments) with porn itself, which is not an argument.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

cjsdowg posted...

Good I hope he takes his supporters for every last cent that they have. At this point there is no excuse .

I'd much rather have people wake up to how corrupt, selfish, and untrustworthy he is than have those people suffer more.

Many trump supporters are middle or low class poor, and quite desperate, I can understand why they tried to turn to an "anti-institution" guy because the institutions were failing them. The problem is they picked the wrong guy.

IMO the majority of Trump supporters are the victims of gaslighting and not bad people.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

PBusted posted...

Why don't they show hate speech or 911 truther theories without context in legal proceedings or in scientific or business presentations?

They do show them in certain scientific contexts and legal proceedings.

I'm pretty sure several "conspiracy theories" have been brought up in court.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

A few people here are cool enough that yeah.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Tyranthraxus posted...

What do you mean again? He never stopped scamming

Sometimes he stops to play golf or hit on his daughter.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Iceland is in the north atlantic, it's capital city is Reykjavik

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

bump

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

hockeybub89 posted...

Has Joe shown his work on how an idea becomes not an idea if it is pornographic?

Would someone going on social media and posting a video of Sonic gameplay or drawing non-pornographic Sonic art be free speech? What about porn disqualifies it from being an idea?

Why don't they just show pictures of porn without context in legal proceedings? Or in scientific or business presentations?

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

@LiterallyEverybodyElse

Is PBusted a known troll? That's the only way I can make sense of them at this point.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Because people care about data and reality.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

PBusted posted...

I haven't made any insults.

Yes you clearly did, calling me spiteful incel is not true, an insult, and has nothing to do with this topic.

You've been wrong about everything. I've never said anything about your voting record or vaccine record. More of your self-serving memory and delusions.

You've said I'm anti-vaxx and alt right. Yet all evidence goes against that

Finally got you to confess you're being alt-right.

??? No I just said that it's generally better and more appropriate to be critical of behaviors than people.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

scar the 1 posted...

As much as they don't seem to understand what OA is about, you're making it very clear that you don't have the faintest idea of what "academic value" is, joe

It's true I don't know about all this gatekeeping, but reading the paper it seems like good science.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Turbam posted...

Are you?

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

_Rinku_ posted...

The mountain shouldn't have any faces on it and should be returned to its rightful owners.

https://eos.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Six-Grandfathers.jpg

You know the same likely goes for where you currently live?

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

metallica846 posted...

Imagine arguing with a doctor.

Um, even you are acknowledging that they are quite possibly wrong.

A title does not inoculate a person from falling into uncritical thinking. I am likely not going to know more about hyper nuances about these kinds of things, but DR has shown that they largely aren't even reading the papers and are much more forming their opinion from parroting talking points they hear on Twitter.

It doesn't take a doctor to outsmart that kind of thinking. I'm fairly good at software engineering, but I'm pretty confident anybody could be right over me if I formed my opinions from Twitter and social media and didn't read or engage with the actual reality on the ground.

Titles don't determine who is right, truth does, and it is telling that DR is not willing to put any sort of reputational or financial stakes behind their brutal and unflinching claim about ivermectin being useless (and, for that matter, me being dumb because I believe it very likely isn't).

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Bio1590 posted...

In which joe numbers doesn't even realize she linked to a completely different part of that website

DezDroppedFreak posted...

Not quite the gotcha he was expecting considering what she linked was not open forum

Look, I will acknowledge that I was mistaken and thinking they were totally equivalent. I'm still not sure what the implication DR is going for but I will be fair and honest and say I thought they were more equivalent than they apparently are. I was wrong.

Honestly I saw the domain was the same, I saw the Oxford thing in the corner was the same, and I saw it was the same kind of "accepted manuscript" so I, potentially wrongly, inferred that DR was trying to dismiss something with the exact same academic value as something they used as a silver bullet earlier.

I do hope they are more explicit about what their implication is about the academic value of what I posted, because it seems like many people here also are confused by their implication.

But again, fair is fair, and some of my assumptions and understandings about their equivalence were wrong.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

PBusted posted...

Not a surprise you'd see something as sad since your entire account's existence is sad.

Insults aren't arguments.

Yes the tweet and you're the one not acknowledging reality.

There's nothing here I've been wrong about, you are wrong about about my very voting record, vaccine record, and ideology.

Ok then I'm telling you you're being alt-right.

That actually would be a better claim. Still false, but better.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/79531697/955949463

Rude people say rude things, this is a shock how?

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

PBusted posted...

[Bunch of ad-bominem bullshit]

This is sad at this point

Nope, that tweet isn't referring to me.

Not the tweet but your Nope at acknowledging reality.

PBusted posted...

I'm reasonable and you're saying I'm not reasonable so you're trying to tell me what I think and feel. So this is a self-confession that you're not reasonable. Noted

No I am saying your are not being reasonable, I'm not telling you your views. Anybody can understand this distinction.

Yes it does. And go ahead, even though far more people dislike you.

No it doesn't. If I'm a troll that means I don't believe what I say, but you insist I do believe what I say. You are arguing with yourself at this point.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

DarkRoast posted...

You do know that's an Open Access journal, correct

If you have such low faith in accepted manuscripts in that journal you should probably tell that to this person:

DarkRoast posted...

Heres a link to the actual, published paper:

https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab591/6310839

Results
Ten RCTs (n=1173) were included. Controls were standard of care [SOC] in five RCTs and placebo in five RCTs. COVID-19 disease severity was mild in 8 RCTs, moderate in one RCT, and mild and moderate in one RCT. IVM did not reduce all-cause mortality vs. controls (RR 0.37, 95%CI 0.12 to 1.13, very low QoE) or LOS vs. controls (MD 0.72 days, 95%CI 0.86 to 2.29, very low QoE). AEs, severe AE and viral clearance were similar between IVM and controls (all outcomes: low QoE). Subgroups by severity of COVID-19 or RoB were mostly consistent with main analyses; all-cause mortality in three RCTs at high RoB was reduced with IVM.
Conclusions
In comparison to SOC or placebo, IVM did not reduce all-cause mortality, length of stay or viral clearance in RCTs in COVID-19 patients with mostly mild disease. IVM did not have an effect on AEs or severe AEs. IVM is not a viable option to treat COVID-19 patients.

Are we done now?

Oh wait, that's you

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

PBusted posted...

Your denial is worthless.

No reasonable person tells others what they think and feel

Yes it does.

No it doesn't.

Yes you are and everyone knows you're a troll.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/79556897#20

First of all, me being a troll doesn't reconcile with all the stuff you claim about me being alt-right and anti-vaxx, secondly finding some other people on gamefaqs who don't like a person is hardly evidence of anything.

I'd guess we could find some unfavorable reviews of you.

Nope. https://twitter.com/wuooods/status/1252051656344317953

Correct, you refuse to acknowledge reality.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

PBusted posted...

Your post is like people who go "as a black person, I think there's no police brutality/I don't get offended by being called a slur" and then it gets found out they're white. Like this dude https:// www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/ white-male-professor-caught-posing-as-black-woman-on -twitter-is-just-the-latest-in-a- bizarre-trend-identity-tourism-153355043.html
But of course you act like you didn't get it.

Well that comparison would only make sense if I was lying about something about myself.

Wrong. And you are anti-vax.

I'm vaccinated and pro-vaccine. There is no argument here, you are wrong.

I have, and I haven't been petty or insulting.

You called me a dumb spiteful anti-vaxx incel.

Porn is sharing of ideas. Ok and Gamefaqs is pro free speech but not a place for trolling and nonsense.

Porn is not sharing of ideas, porn is sharing of porn.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

BTW, here is the accepted manuscript of the new meta-analysis:
https://academic.oup.com/ofid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ofid/ofab358/6316214

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

Also, btw, what you just said is not true, the meta-analysis refers to multiple prophylaxis studies.

And having ivermectin to help people only helps us in our fight against covid, it doesn't somehow hurt vaccines.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

DarkRoast posted...

Ivermectin has zero evidence for effectiveness as prophylaxis.

Vaccination is it. Period.

So you think my speculative claim is wrong?

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9

PBusted posted...

Persecution complex and denial.

I literally just told you I don't think I'm being persecuted.

Yes it does.

No it doesn't.

lol you completely ignoring the dozens of posts saying conservatives known for being hypocrites and party of projection. As are you.

I'm not a conservative and again what this site is doing is obvious to everybody but apparently you.

You're not fooling anyone.

You are just lying at this point. Trying to tell me my political stance when it doesn't line up with the truth in any way.

I mean what good is talking to you when you refuse to even acknowledge reality?

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9