Lurker > adjl

Zeus posted...

What's intellectually lazy is trying to swerve the discussion in that direction.

Discussing the morality, practicality, and other bases and implications of a given rule is lazier than saying "it's the rule, just follow it"? How exactly did you arrive at that vague facsimile of a conclusion?

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Mead posted...

holy shit

what the fuck was he planning to do with that information

Duckbear's general vibe has always been "I'm collecting information on all of the humans so I can understand them better." Hence all the polls and his tendency to almost never participate in the discussions he starts. In all likelihood, I doubt he ever planned to do anything with the info, he just feels compelled to collect it because that's the only way he believes he'll be able to understand other people.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

ParanoidObsessive posted...

Even if you disagree with the mindset, it's still very much a "Fair, next" sort of situation. If you didn't want to deal with the potential issues, you shouldn't be sending your kids to Catholic school in the first place.

Pretty much any discussion around a subject like this doesn't care about the question of "did they break the rules?", instead focusing on the question of "should this rule exist?". Obviously the rules were broken. Treating that like the end of the discussion is just intellectually lazy, and anyone who doesn't plan to contribute more than that really shouldn't bother trying to participate.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

ArvTheGreat posted...

Seems like if anyone has flu like symptoms now adays its deemed to be Covid

It's often suspected to be Covid, but it's not diagnosed as such without a positive Covid test. The days of "presumptive" Covid cases are mostly past now that testing is more readily available (and even then, presumptive Covid cases were based on more symptoms than would be common to any flu-like illness).

Clench281 posted...

the CDC website points out that low flu prevalence is likely due to the measures taken to curb covid having profound impact on reducing flu transmission.

There's also the fact that flu cases in general can be expected to be under-reported this season because people with flu symptoms are going to be isolating instead of seeing a doctor for a conclusive influenza test, meaning it's mostly just going to be serious cases that get confirmed (and those prone to serious cases are doing more than usual to avoid flu infections because of Covid). At least looking at Canada, influenza testing rates are way up this year, but that's pretty much entirely because everyone working with vulnerable populations is getting proactively tested for it regularly, not because the general population is getting more tests than usual.

OhhhJa posted...

Funny how it REALLY didn't work for curbing covid

It didn't work for *stopping* Covid. It has worked for curbing it, at least in areas that do enough of it.

OhhhJa posted...

Also, love the cognitive dissonance of reconciling "people aren't following the recommendations and thats why covid is so rampant" with "flu has been nearly nonexistent because of masks and social distancing" lol. Pick a lane please.

I've already corrected you at least once when you've spouted this nonsense. I shouldn't have to do it again if you're trying to maintain any pretense of intellectual honesty here.

WhiskeyDisk posted...

Every native instinct in me bristles at masking on principle.

You shouldn't instinctively resist listening to the best available public health advice. That's just silly.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

OhhhJa posted...

Oh look, the same posters who didn't care about democrat riots in every major city for a whole year are outraged about MAH CAPITOL where nobody was murdered except for a trump supporters.

Why yes, people are indeed more bothered by a bold-faced attempt to undermine the democratic process by assassinating major political figures than by collateral violence perpetrated by a handful of troublemakers during some very justifiable protests. Sensible people, anyway, which tends not to include people that accept "he died from a stroke after being hit in the head" means somebody wasn't murdered (or at least manslaughtered).

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

hockey7318 posted...

We call my nieces and nephew cousins to my step daughter. There's no real reason to convolute it more than that. They're family.

Pretty much. You know your exact genetic relationship to your relatives, but nobody else can do anything useful with that information, so there's really no point in coming up with fancy terms to communicate it in any more detail.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

OhhhJa posted...

Because other than Ashley Babbitt being shot... nobody was murdered. One guy died of a stroke. 2 from heart attacks. One from an undisclosed medical emergency. Oh and two cops apparently committed suicide a few days after (which is very strange imo). Yet the media keeps calling it "the deadly riot." Oooooh so spooky. This is the same media that has been calling the leftist riots responsible for dozens of deaths "mostly peaceful protests" the past year.

And I gotta love the pearl clutching lefties being like "MAH CAPITOL MAH SENATORS" whom... let's be honest... were never in any danger. You didn't give a shit when your own communities and local businesses were getting torched. You fake leftists (state-ists) care more about your senators who don't two fucks about you than you do your own neighbors

adjl posted...

Oh look, the posters that have been desperately trying to deny that anything of consequence happened at the Capitol are eagerly latching on to any report that downplays what happened at the Capitol. I am such surprise.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

ksamos11 posted...

natural selection

I don't think explosives are a heritable trait, and it's hard to say whether or not this will impact his ultimate reproductive success (since we don't know if he would have had more kids after this).

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

DrYuya posted...

They are the reason insurance companies do partial fault in liability decisions.

They bitch and moan about it but they deserve only partial payments when they share some fault by being that stupid.

Pretty much. If you can prevent an accident, but don't, you bear some responsibility for it happening. "Don't drive into people" is also a rule of the road.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Oh look, the posters that have been desperately trying to deny that anything of consequence happened at the Capitol are eagerly latching on to any report that downplays what happened at the Capitol. I am such surprise.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

I like raisin bran, but I usually throw some other stuff onto it. Adding dried apricots, dates, almonds, and coconut makes for quite the fibrous breakfast.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

lihlih posted...

Ok, Trump supporter.

This, coming from a guy who thinks he knows better what a comment means than the person who said it. Riiiight...

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

lihlih posted...

Except, she brought up the subject, and the only comment I made was that the victims of child abuse don't have a choice in the matter. So that debunks both of your mental gymnastics excuses.

That debunks nothing, and I have no idea what bizarre bootleg copy of logic you're running that makes you think it does.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

lihlih posted...

The only possible reason she had for making that statement was to disagree with the 1 statement I made about child abuse victims.

That, or she was discouraging you from making any further comments because your obvious ignorance on the matter meant that would be bad. That, or she thought you bringing up the subject was inappropriate. Oh hey, two plausible other interpretations! That was hard!

Furthermore, even if we say that your interpretation is reasonable (which is a big if), she has explicitly told you that's not what she meant. Why are you arguing against a position nobody is holding?

lihlih posted...

What you're doing is Trump supporter levels of mental gymnastics to make your internet boob queen not be morally wrong.

When did this become a question of "morally wrong"?

Now, are you actually going to quote a post where anyone claims child abuse victims have a choice, or are you going to admit that you had no basis for making such an absurd accusation and apologize for being silly?

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

JigsawTDC posted...

But the egg would still be a chicken egg considering a chicken hatches from it. Right?

I would say so, but I think an equally valid argument can be made in favour of naming the egg after the species that laid it. In truth, it's such a rare fringe case that never needs to be conveniently referenced in everyday conversation that I think eschewing simple names like "chicken egg" in favour of terminology that more comprehensively describes the nuances of the situation is reasonable.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

lihlih posted...

She quoted me saying that child abuse victims didn't have a choice in getting abused, and she said that I knew nothing about child abuse, saying that what I said is wrong.

No, she said that you know nothing of child abuse. That does not mean that saying child abuse victims don't have a choice in getting abused is wrong, just that you are ignorant of the matter and really not in a position to speak on it beyond the extremely common knowledge that we all already share (which is therefore pointless to state).

Now, are you actually going to quote a post where anyone claims child abuse victims have a choice, or are you going to admit that you had no basis for making such an absurd accusation and apologize for being silly?

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

lihlih posted...

When I said that child abuse victims are different to alcohol addiction "victims" because they have no choice in the matter, she says that I have no idea about how child abuse works, saying that what I said is wrong(that child abuse victims have no say in the matter). This is clear as day, nothing can be misconstrued as anything else. I'm sure you guys are going to use Trump supporter logic and say that that's not what she said, and that I'm in the wrong, when it's clear that she's in the wrong here.

The lengths that some people will go to simp for some internet boobs is just ridiculously mind boggling.

The post you quoted does not include anyone claiming that child abuse victims have a choice in being abused. Please try again.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

SunWuKung420 posted...

The free waffles aren't that good.

Another reason to favour making your own, if having waffles at home is a priority. That said, complaining about the quality of free stuff isn't the most sensible thing to do.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

lihlih posted...

someone who literally believe that child abuse victims had a choice in getting abused.

I want you to quote the post where anyone made such a claim.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Krazy_Kirby posted...

chicken. different birds created a new bird, but it wasn't a chicken egg yet, because it wasn't a chicken until it hatched

That. The first egg that hatched into a chicken was laid by some ancestral proto-chicken.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

2-page resumes are becoming more normalized now, given how squishy one page is, but that's definitely the most you should ever consider for the vast majority of jobs. Telling your accomplishments in novel form is what a CV is for, not the resume.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

lihlih posted...

Also, I got what I needed from the relationship, which was to get out the barracks until I got out from the Army. So was I supposed to stay in that sham marriage forever?

No. You were supposed to grow a pair and divorce her properly instead of sleeping around and knocking up another girl (because apparently birth control is hard) behind her back. Divorce is fine. Not every marriage should be preserved. Being a spineless, lying coward is what people give you a hard time for, not getting divorced.

lihlih posted...

You chose to keep drinking until you developed a chemical dependency on it.

Addiction's rarely that simple, actually, especially alcoholism. The line between "I want this drink" and "I need this drink" can be very, very fine, and often the person crossing it isn't even aware of it. There's no magic "if you drink more than this you'll become an alcoholic" number to avoid, as convenient as that would be.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Spec Ops: The Line put players into a fictional scenario that confronted the very real, human consequences of the atrocities committed in wars like that in Iraq (including personally bombing an area with white phosphorous and then walking through the aftermath, which is one of the most memorable scenes I've ever experienced in a game). This one is putting players into a historic scenario, but steering clear of confronting players with any of the consequences of what actually happened. Don't want to get too political, after all, because there's nothing political about the War in Iraq.

I will say that it is possible for a game to tackle difficult political subjects without explicitly stating a political opinion, and instead just presenting events and their consequences and letting people form their own thoughts and feelings on the matter. The aforementioned Spec Ops generally didn't tell the player to feel bad about what they were doing. It just lead them to do it, then gave them a chance to think about it. But there's a world of difference between "we're not going to state an opinion because the impact will be greater if the player figures it out for themselves" and "we're not going to try to inform players about the reality of the situations they're playing in because we might offend somebody and make less money." By the sounds of things, this game is just being spineless, though there's a part of me that hopes I'm wrong and they're actually just trying to avoid spoiling all the war crimes to make them more impactful.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Mead posted...

appetizers and desserts are usually pretty high too

At least with desserts, there's actually some room to justify pricing them so high. They often require different skill sets and ingredients from the rest of the menu, are at an increased risk of spoilage due to being ordered less frequently, and slow down turnover pretty considerably when tables order them (hence servers always push tea/coffee with dessert, which are incredibly high-margin items). A lot of places just don't offer dessert at all because of how bothersome it is, so I can understand those that do pricing it high to offset that hassle.

That said, knowing that doesn't stop me from looking at dessert menus and saying "I could make that entire cake for less than what they're charging for a slice."

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

SunWuKung420 posted...

Link, I don't pronounce "n" like inn. It's an inn and a n.

adjl posted...

who the hell pronounces the letter N as "nen"?

Spelling out "N" is most commonly done as "enn." Phonetically, very similar to "inn" (short E and I sounds are quite close).

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

SunWuKung420 posted...

An nen is not correct.

A nen is.

While a correct statement, who the hell pronounces the letter N as "nen"?

The purpose of the word "an" is to avoid making multiple glottal attacks in sequence, because that's just uncomfortable. Dipthong vowel sounds (sounds with two phonetic components, such as "I" being a combination of "ah" and "ee") are okay to string together because the dipthong makes it easier to slide into next vowel (such as "I am" being pronounced more or less like "ah yam" instead of attacking both words separately), but the word "a" is a monophthong and doesn't have that option. "Oh" runs into similar problems, but can be turned into a pseudo-dipthong by effectively adding a W ("Oh I" becomes "Oh wi"), which is less an option for "a" because it's a much more open vowel.

"An" exists to add a consonant with which to articulate the following vowel sound instead of making another glottal attack. Whether or not it's appropriate to use depends exclusively on phonics. Spelling has nothing to do with it except for what spelling implies about phonics.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Let's see... using https://www.allrecipes.com/recipe/20513/classic-waffles/ as a template and making rough estimates based on Canadian prices (multiply by ~0.75 to directly convert to USD, dairy in particular will be even cheaper than that):

2c flour - ~$0.30
1t salt - $0
4t baking powder - ~$0.20
2T sugar - <$0.05
2 eggs - ~$0.75
1.5c milk - ~$1
1/3c butter - $0.75
1t vanilla - ~$0.38 for real, ~$0.07 for artificial

Total: ~$3.43 for 10 waffles if you use real vanilla (which the hotel probably isn't), $3.12 with artificial (2.57 and 2.34 USD, respectively). Mixing the batter takes ~15 minutes, cooking the waffles themselves can be neglected because you'll be spending that time at the hotel anyway, and then another 5 minutes to clean the waffle iron when you're done (since you can wash the rest of the dishes while the waffles are cooking).

Ultimately, that means those 10 waffles are worth a little more than $3 and about 20 minutes of work. A nice bonus, but I wouldn't really say it's going to be enough to be the primary deciding factor in your hotel choice.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Zeus posted...

Otherwise welcome to the unintended consequences of government.

How is this an unintended consequence of government? Costs going up to cover increases in minimum wage? That's not unintended, that's just one of the potential strategies for ensuring people are paid adequately (not that minimum wage increasing by a dollar in 50 years achieves that, but that's beside the point), and is completely within expectations. Costs being increased by more than is needed to cover the wage increase so corporate can trick customers into helping them pocket a few extra bucks? That's not a consequence of government, that's a consequence of greedy execs.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Presumably, the problem is that you won the joint war. They didn't just want B to be killed, they wanted to take over B's territory. Their ideal for your involvement would have been to whittle every city down to <5% HP, then let them take it over and claim the spoils.

So yeah. Just kill them both.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Judgmenl posted...

You want to naturally do things as efficiently as possible, and as a result stories in MMORPGs really aren't good as a levelling process, and people mainly push through them as fast as possible because they're intentional time gates to get to the "interesting content".

So... don't do that? Take your time and enjoy the story. If playing the game in the most enjoyable way isn't the optimal, most efficient way to play, that's really not a problem because you're enjoying yourself. There's more than one way to enjoy games.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Depending on the nature of your immunocompromise, the vaccine might not actually help you. You need a functional immune system to get immunity from vaccines.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

grimhilde00 posted...

I'd rather my money go toward vaccine development and economic stimulus during a global pandemic

Than locking up poor people for using drugs (which should also be treated as a healthcare issue)

I believe that's the point. Even from a cynical, money-only viewpoint, Covid should be seeing more investment than the wars on terror/drugs. It's not, which is silly.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

SunWuKung420 posted...

You always use "a" if the following word is a consonant especially a "N".

You use "an" any time the next word starts with a vowel sound. The letter itself decides nothing on its own. If pronounced, "N" starts with an vowel sound, and therefore should be preceded by "an." Otherwise, you're saying "a enn," and that's just awkward to articulate. Similarly, "hour" and "herb" should be preceded by "an," since the H's are silent. "Horoscope" and "harmony" should not, because the H's are pronounced.

That said, acronyms do fall into a weird middle ground where they can potentially be read as their full name, by spelling the acronym out, or by pronouncing the acronym itself (in some cases). In cases like the NES, that can lead to some ambiguity about which article is appropriate ("Nintendo Entertainment System" and "Ness" both start with consonant sounds, "N-E-S" with a vowel). In practice, most people just write it however they'd read it (since that feels like the most natural thing for them to do). For other readers, that can sometimes result in momentary confusion if they read it differently, but it never confounds the meaning of the sentence, so it's really not worth worrying about.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Hospy posted...

Id have to see more than one day of receipts and pay to comment further, but $169 after credit card fees is prolly around $160-165 or so, and $39 after payroll taxes is probably around $50-55 in costs.

Oh yeah, it's not as clear-cut as comparing the gross income to take-home pay, but it's still a pretty substantial difference. As you say, more than one day's receipts would be needed to actually conclude anything about dishonest marketing, but I presume TC wouldn't have made this topic if this weren't a broader trend.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Hospy posted...

Having a percentage increase on bills is never going to match what you pay your employees because your employees are hourly and they cannot miraculously determine how much business you get in a day.

You can, however, make reasonable estimates based on average sales. Managers already do this in scheduling their staff. You'll still have days where you end up with the surcharge being over or under the wage increase, but you can get a whole lot closer than it sounds like TC's restaurant is getting consistently.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

They haven't lied or stolen from their customers. They said they added 3.5% because of minimum wage increase, they didn't say that 3.5% covers the difference from the minimum wage increase. They were upfront on what they are doing and it's up to the customer to decide if that is reasonable.

"I need you to pay me $20 to cover this work I need done" is absolutely a lie if the work in question only costs $10 and you pocket the change. You're exploiting the donor's good will to accept money from them under false pretenses. The customer can't decide whether or not the surcharge is reasonable if they don't actually have the information needed to assess how reasonable it is.

MICHALECOLE posted...

i also put in my two weeks a week ago

You should take this story to the media (anonymously, I would think) at the end of this week. If they're lying to their customers, that's something the public deserves to know.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

He'd probably have an easier time providing for his kids if he didn't spend so much time and money on fruitless conquests (complete with sending said children into battles he knows they can't win). However pure his intentions might be, his obsessive ambitions are twisting them into something deeply unhealthy.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Revelation34 posted...

Pokemon MOBA sounds like it would be shit considering how many Pokemon exist.

Presumably, not every Pokemon will be in it (yet another reason people hoping for the game will inevitably be butthurt, since it's impossible to tick off everyone's wishlist). Pokken Tournament does just fine with a relatively small subset of Pokemon available to play, and that's what I'd expect to see there (though presumably more than Pokken had, since it's easier to give mobas larger rosters).

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

What kind of a man won't just eat the can whole when the tab breaks?

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

They at least hold a controlling interest in them, which is true for a lot of game companies. They're kind of all over the market. Outsourcing the Pokemon moba to them isn't because they have meaningful experience due to owning Riot (they picked Riot up because LoL was already successful, rather than playing any role in its success), it's because they have experience in making other F2P mobile mobas, most of which are crappy asset flip clones of each other. Riot's name wasn't anywhere in the Pokemon moba announcement, so I wouldn't expect them to have any involvement in it.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

AWinterJ posted...

Recalling, reading and even posting in things on a public message board doesn't mean that person cares I agree.

It means you care enough to devote some time and attention to them. It doesn't mean you care a lot, necessarily, but actually not caring about something generally entails ignoring it.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Playsaver posted...

I'm seeing reports that some gas powered electric plants went down because they ended up cutting power to gas pumps (not owned by them) that fed gas to their plants.

Sounds like those plant managers need to play more Factorio. Lrn2use burner inserters on boilers, nubs.

(For the uninitiated, one of Factorio's power options is to use boilers powered by solid fuels like coal, which must be moved into them via robotic arms. The standard inserters require power to operate, though, so in a brownout/blackout situation, they become unable to add more fuel to the boilers, causing the entire system to shut down until fuel is manually added to the boilers. This can be prevented by using burner inserters, which are less energy-efficient, but operate by burning their own solid fuel, which they can self-insert even in a power outage.)

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

What I like most about the whole "contract marriage" thing is that he didn't bring it up at all until he'd been talking about "his friend" cheating for quite some time and it became clear that A) Nobody was buying that it wasn't him doing it, and B) Nobody was going to validate him cheating on his wife. It's so obviously an effort to rationalize it after the fact (if it's even completely true, which I doubt, particularly where his ex-wife did some poking around here at one point to find out what we knew about his affairs and give her side of the story), yet he keeps trying to pretend it was a key issue all along and that anyone agrees with him.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Entity13 posted...

The race is on between him and Mitch. Clearly, this must be decided with a Thunderdome.

Mitch-slap vs. Cruzifixion

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

BlackScythe0 posted...

Oh isn't there supposed to be a pokemon moba or am I remembering wrong?

There is, but it's a Switch/mobile crossplay game being developed by Tencent, which everyone's super salty about (not that people wouldn't have inevitably been upset over whatever they chose to do with a Pokemon moba, given how much everyone's built up their own personal, specific fantasy of what it ought to be like).

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Capitalism, ho!

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

JoanOfArcade posted...

I hope they did add a stash you can access on all characters

The Gamespot article on it mentions a shared stash and some other QoL improvements, though that's the only one they explicitly mentioned.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

On one hand, this is pretty cool. I've never actually played D2, despite enjoying several other, more modern ARPG's, and I've been hoping for a rerelease so I could have that opportunity. On the other hand, though, after the nonsense Blizzard pulled with the WC3 remake (namely breaking 15-year-old existing copies of the game by forcing updates on them, which is completely unacceptable), I no longer trust them not to ruin any game I buy from them and will therefore not be giving them any more money until they can regain my trust. I might buy this if I can get a copy for like $5, but it'll be a while before that's even remotely possible.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Zeus posted...

Well, it's tacky and in poor taste, not to mention hypocritical when they raise such massive outrage when the upmost reverence isn't paid to the deaths of people they like. Conversely, it's like whatever. It's not like these same people weren't wishing him dead on a daily basis. And I'm sure it's not even half as bad as the stuff Gamefaqs mod team -- which so harshly punished people for not respecting other deaths -- are saying about it, considering all of the things the comments they've no-actioned that would have otherwise resulted in warnings and suspensions. It'd be nice if Gamefaqs, Twitter, Facebook, and others ever exercised any measure of consistency, but it is what it is.

Of course Zeus is butthurt about this. On a scale from 1 to surprised, I am 1.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.

Zangulus posted...

This is a topic specifically about the tragedy in Texas currently happening. I dig where youre coming from, but it wasnt really applicable to what I was talking about.

Oh, I know it's about Texas, I just hadn't realized how long-standing a problem this was there.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.