Lurker > ryanell666

Zeus posted...

I'm not even sure I want to know what that's slang for >_>

Don't be coy, you know what it means.

Mead posted...

Is she the bathwater woman

yes, she's queen of the Simps.

Well,....they can try to make me comply...."try"....

Good lighting and heavy make-up can make any post-wall woman look freshly legal.

adjl posted...

Therein lies the line between self-defense and psychopathy.

...but you bleeding hearts types immediate label with the 'psychopathy' off the bat without seeing the bigger picture at stake.

Runner_style posted...

How is throwing a firecracker at someone who isn't acting aggressive in any way, shape, or form defending your children?

Depends, are you asking for a story or trying to push the agenda to advocate homeless rights?

It seems like you'd use your children as a shield in order to act like a piece of shit to others.

....ever see a homeless man whip out his dick? Jerk it off front of you?

I haven't.....but my 9 year old daughter has, walking home from school one day.

Still think I'm hiding behind my kid yet?

adjl posted...

If you like the idea of throwing firecrackers at people, that's a violent urge. That's not me labelling you, that's the dictionary definitions of each term in the phrase.

so defending your children by any means necessary is a violent urge?...

adjl posted...

If the mere presence of homeless people in the world around you gives you violent urges, you should probably get yourself checked out and treated before your dangerous mental illness hurts somebody.

As opposed to turning my neighborhood into a shit-hole?

Before you and I get into this, understand that I'm not un-sympathetic to the homeless or addicted. If there are ways to help these people, of course help them.

.....but when push comes to shove?....all bets are off with me and those in my neighbourhood.

So if I were you, check yourself on labeling others with "violent urges", because you don't know what you're talking about.

Page not found....but if you want a discussion about this?..... GOOD, those "punks" are my heroes, and should serve as an example to the rest of us dealing with vagrants in neighborhoods.

Judgmenl posted...

Jordan Peterson peddles no answers.

oh he does, just most choose no to listen because of their conflicting identity politics.

THEGODDAMNBATMA posted...

I don't necessarily agree with this. I feel like most of his answers relate too much to animalistic instinct or caveman bullshit that simply does not relate to modern times. Humans have evolved, we are not cavemen, you can not try to tell me that everyone in this world or even a fraction of the population of this world still thinks like cavemen. He also puts too much focus on western world ideals but tries to paint them onto the entire homogenus.

He's not "totally" wrong in his allusions though. I mean you could be insulted by his comparisons to other lesser organisms on this planet, even those that are animistic/caveman....but they do hold some truth to humanity and the way we operate, especially in first world western societies.

Again like Judgmel, most choose not to acknowledge such thesis and answers because in this day and age, we have those "breaking boundaries" for the sake of breaking them, without little to no fore-thought on the consequences after. So it's easier to dismiss Peterson, saying he has no answers, and his knowledge is bullshit. ...even when it's proven over and over again there are inherent truths to such simple logic.

....that and people don't like him for the simple fact that he's been labelled a "transphobe" for speaking out against "compelled speech", which I agree is a bad thing. Since it speaks to those tribalism/caveman paradigms he lectures, you have one group of people exercising their will upon another group, forcing them to speak or act a certain way. History has always proven that to be disastrous which is his point all along. Cavemen back in the day would just turn around a club you to death. ...today, in this more civilized era, would just join a 'white nationalist' group because you can't club them to death, but you're forced to pick your tribe anyways and defend your way of life.......

The thing with Jordan Peterson is that he peddles easy answers, but the catch is we live in this moment of history on this world where "common sense" has been de-valued to the point those easy answers are hard to explain and exercise.

And he makes his fame and money, because.... "the one-eye'd man is king" so to speak.

Then go see it....?

Quickly eat up the budget, before they get defunded.....it's smart.

Crying over a McMuffin....how American can you get?

OG L&O all the way.... followed by Criminal Intent...

SVU is a joke, and a shadow of the franchise's former self. Meloni's episodes were great, but the show went downhill and turned into Twitter SJW lectures.

CedarPointcp posted...

and i mean real money and i don't really mean like coins in that salvation army kettle

Generally no...

The reality of charities is that most of the money is eaten up by administration costs. So if a charity earns (ie) one million dollars for the starving kids in Africa. 90% of that money will go to the person organizing the event, while the 10% actually goes to the cause. In all honesty, it doesn't take a lot of money to feed someone, so whatever that 10% is will be enough until the next fundraising event, while the organization itself can boast ONE MILLION DOLLARS for believing they are so successful.

PKMNsony posted...

I find any of his movies that aren't part of the Batman series long-winded and boring as hell. Even the first Batman is hard to re-watch.

That's how the game is played though; as explained in "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back"

..do the paycheck gig, "then" do the art gig...

Obviously, WB wanted to reboot Batman after the shitty Clooney movie. And at that time Nolan hit it out of the park with Memento, so WB got their "patsy" to make their movie.

And with all that Batman money, Nolan made Prestige, Interstellar, Inception, and Dunkirk.....and honestly, he's received more acclaim from his non-Batman movies for it.

I'm waiting for the National Guard to bust out the "Martyr Machine" in the CHAZ.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnHTfsCTVxo

/pol/

Depends what kind of hooker she is, there are varying degrees.

The Street level? Back-alley jobs for a hit of meth? Trafficked on the street corner, because her last boyfriend needed money for his aspiring rap career, and the trade just stuck with her?

"Massage Parlous"? ... FOB girls working on that Visa.

E-thots.... how many tokens would it take to get to the center of those legs?

Low-Volume VIP companion. ...that freshly legal college girl too proud to flip burgers for a slave-wage, makes $2000-$5000 per weekend, with 'treads still left on the tire'?

....either way, if you just found out, no matter the degree 'get tested' ASAP.

Afterwards. if you enjoy being in a cucked-relationship with her, that's up to you....

Zareth posted...

I mean, do you want to vote for the guy who's racist or the guy who's REALLY racist?

depends on who is more racist against whichever race, right?

I understand the BLM movement, but when the message shifts from demanding police to be accountable for their abuse to "kill whitey".... come voting time, you think white people are going to vote for the side that represents 'forced equity'?

ryanell666 posted...

I wouldn't blame anyone for choosing a racist, misogynist, corporate tyrant over the alternative

let's be fair and at least quote the full sentence....

Trump is merely a result of typical American apathy....myself included as I didn't vote last time because the options sucked. I mean, "aren't we suppose to be the best country in the world" and THIS is the best we can do?....screw it, let it all fall apart, imo.

I don't support Trump, but I understood why he won. Too many cry-babies eager to make polices no one wants. I wouldn't blame anyone for choosing a racist, misogynist, corporate tyrant over the alternative (which honestly could breed more racism and misogyny as the pendulum swings).