Lurker > Corrik7
LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
| Board List | |
|---|---|
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 311: Ye says Nay |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 5:51:10 PM #19 | MoogleKupo141 posted... uh you guys seeing whats happening on twitterYeah, and anti-Semitism is trending under the #jews hashtag. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 311: Ye says Nay |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 5:45:08 PM #15 | Jakyl25 posted... Corrik asked whats in the international food aisles at my local groceriesWhat does British stuff consist of? --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 4:56:23 PM #498 | Jakyl25 posted... Wow ok! Ive never lived somewhere without one but I guess you do?I don't even know what you could fill a whole aisle with in such a section lol. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 4:53:56 PM #496 | xp1337 posted... That doesn't make sense. Changing the name wouldn't shield him if something really bad came out.Trying to get a little good will in before shit hits the fan or keep the focus on the name instead of the other issue. Amazon didn't delist merchandise until they said they were changing their name. FedEx doesn't sell merchandise and just asked them to look into it changing the name. Nike didn't delist anything until the name change was pretty much alluded to also. I think you are overstating the pressure companies put on them. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 4:52:56 PM #495 | Jakyl25 posted... How often are you shopping in the international foods aisle?Um, what? Lol. If it is in my store it would be in the canned food aisle or I guess the taco kit section. No such thing as an international food aisle. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 4:46:29 PM #492 | Jakyl25 posted... I find this hard to believe honestlyMaybe. Idk. Never noticed it before. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 4:08:19 PM #485 | They need to stop trying to make Goya a thing. Nobody is buying Goya that ain't already. I doubt my area even carries it. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Coronavirus Topic 10 |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 4:06:21 PM #14 | Yesmar_ posted... Yeah, looking at that graph (assuming the scale is not really off between countries) whatever happened in Israel doesn't seem to be linked to schools, or if so there's something particularly off about how schools are opening there.Large number of infected are kids and staff. I read something like 1400 kids and 600 staff members. Don't quote me on those numbers. Oh 1335 and 691. Is in article itself. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Coronavirus Topic 10 |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 4:02:46 PM #12 | Not sure if my cousins wedding is cancelled or not due to new pa guidelines. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:58:26 PM #483 | MoogleKupo141 posted... when you say minority owners which definition of that word are you usingThose who hold minority stakes. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Final Fantasy VII Remake Spoiler Topic 2 (spoilers in this topic too) |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:55:30 PM #286 | Btw, this game would be so much better if it didn't force you to walk at points and cloud like just jumped across planks instead of walking slowly across them and crap. The unreal engine or whatever is dated for this game type. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Final Fantasy VII Remake Spoiler Topic 2 (spoilers in this topic too) |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:34:53 PM #284 | Crane takes barely any time the second time thru when u don't have to get the materias. Tifa's bar climbing in chapter 16 is arguably longer weirdly enough. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:22:09 PM #479 | https://nypost.com/2020/07/15/a-washington-bombshell-is-coming-and-its-not-about-redskins/ Seems Snyder agreeing to change the mascot name could have been an attempt to smokescreen from a bigger issue. A bunch of minority owners were selling stakes last week also. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Coronavirus Topic 9 |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:14:21 PM #500 | Tange says Wear Your Damn Mask --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Coronavirus Topic 9 |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:10:02 PM #497 | SmartMuffin posted... Not really. It'll also look even better long-term as they're definitely closer to herd immunity than anyone else is.Their gdp predictions are just as low if not lower than surrounding lockdown countries. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Did you like the movie Jerry Maguire? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:04:13 PM #2 | Yes. Why no poll. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Coronavirus Topic 9 |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:03:31 PM #495 | Well, Sweden's goal was to come out ahead in the long run, I believe. That said, their economy took just as much a hit as many lockdown countries did also. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Coronavirus Topic 10 |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:01:48 PM #4 | Also, Walmart requiring masks for all shoppers now. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-15/walmart-to-require-all-u-s-customers-wear-masks-as-of-july-20 Expect to see the complaining to amplify on social media very soon --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Coronavirus Topic 10 |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 2:58:15 PM #3 | https://www.wsj.com/articles/israelis-fear-schools-reopened-too-soon-as-covid-19-cases-climb-11594760001 Israel wondering if schools opening caused outbreaks. In a blow to those who think reopening schools is a good idea. On the flip side, Belgium has criticized not reopening schools by saying abuse of children is rising dramatically. Here is a graph of cases after reopening of schools for some countries. https://i.imgur.com/K2YLGRn.png Vertical lines are reopening dates. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Coronavirus Topic 9 |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 2:56:15 PM #493 | There has been some studies that say this virus may have been around as far as last year even early in the year, but it all seems rather speculative. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Coronavirus Topic 10 |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 2:50:54 PM #2 | A couple of people I have seen that tested positive recently are the Oklahoma governor, Russell Westbrook and Harrison Barnes, the Pac-12 commissioner, the Arizona Cardinals owner (I think). We have yet to see anyone really famous succumb to the virus, which if someone did I think that the narrative to the every day person could change because it hits home moreso. However, famous people are getting the disease. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Coronavirus Topic 10 |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 2:47:17 PM #1 | Try to keep debate centered around the Coronavirus itself. Discuss testing, outbreaks, trends, safety regulations, vaccines, treatments, personal experiences with the disease, or so on. This again is the counter I use. https://youtu.be/NMre6IAAAiU As you can see in it today, South Africa and India have been moving up quickly in cases, in addition to some of the usual players like Brazil and USA. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Coronavirus Topic 9 |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 2:41:12 PM #491 | Okee dokee, vcharon! https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-07/uops-prf071320.php I just applied for a vaccine trial also. Cool. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Coronavirus Topic 9 |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 2:25:47 PM #489 | v_charon posted... Europe's state is infinitely better than the US's.Well, gee willikers! Sorry that you don't like someone because they ask you to hold yourself to higher standards than muffin! Lol --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Coronavirus Topic 9 |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 1:37:47 PM #474 | https://www.dailywire.com/news/florida-labs-found-significantly-inflating-positive-covid-testing-rate Lol but why v_charon posted... Quite frankly, if people like you would stop denying this is a serious issue and do what the hell you're supposed to do like New Zealand, they wouldn't have to close international travel for very long.Please stop comparing to island nations or places with strict borders / natural borders. It makes you less believable. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Final Fantasy VII Remake Spoiler Topic 2 (spoilers in this topic too) |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 1:28:18 PM #281 | Suprak the Stud posted... Essentially what you do is walk through those barriers that occasionally pop up. You walk sideways to them and then sprint through. Ive seen speed runs do it before.The speedrun I saw the other day had them using item animations to animate through walls and shit to save time. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Final Fantasy VII Remake Spoiler Topic 2 (spoilers in this topic too) |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 1:27:36 PM #280 | davidponte posted... I keep wanting to come back to this for a hard mode playthrough and the platinum trophy, but some of the chapters kind of drag on a little too long. CH17 in particular before the boss rush at the end was just straight up a bad time for me gameplay wise, and I don't really want to have to deal with that again.Skip all the cut scenes. It probably cuts the game basically in half. Depending on your dress situation, you might be able to skip side quests also. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 6:07:56 AM #465 | ChaosTonyV4 posted... Its really not that serious.Gotta get their ignore points in, bud. That said, it's crazy to me how liberals talk about fascism then say comments like hers. What 33% of registered voters or like 48% of voters should be silenced because their views are different? Now that's some fascism lol. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 5:47:29 AM #463 | KamikazePotato posted... lolRight-winger lol. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 5:21:52 AM #457 | TheRock1525 posted... you know that whole argument of "trump could cure cancer and liberals would still hate him?"I literally already said I was wrong when he posted the article where Ivanka agreed to take an employee status to satisfy people who had concerns about her being not bound to ethics. That was already agreed upon literally the post after the article was posted because it completely makes the argument in which I am right about (the laws on what makes an employee and being paid or not) extraneous, since she has agreed to be bound as a federal employee. Like, the argument regarding her being a federal employee was totally done there. Then sheen had to act weird and act like him being accidentally right for the wrong reasons made his whole argument right (which it didn't. The facts remain the same). Then had to make some weird ignoring posts. Don't get those. Then it was done again! Then Tony decided to literally bring up an already agreed upon fact (she is a federal employee) to try and reargue it again. I can I only guess because he felt left out if he wants to act like not bandwagoning when the entire discussion was already settled. Lol. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 5:15:10 AM #456 | ChaosTonyV4 posted... From your own damn link, dude.You are literally arguing fucking nothing right now. Why else would you be arguing nothing right now unless just trying to join the bandwagon? Like, duh? --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 5:13:55 AM #455 | ChaosTonyV4 posted... No fucking shit. I said this in 3 different posts prior to you making this post and before you even chimed into this conversation. What the fuck are you even arguing at this point? Lmfao --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Coronavirus Topic 9 |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 5:06:56 AM #438 | https://i.redd.it/9e3qjp4o5wa51.jpg Gonna be muffin once someone close to him gets it haha. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 5:02:40 AM #452 | ChaosTonyV4 posted... No, no, no. Youre missing the point once again.Incorrect, Tony. I get you gotta try and echo your boy, but no. Just no. https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/Ivanka-becomes-unpaid-employee-11037958.php Ivanka was joining the administration regardless and had her own office. Legal experts wanted her to join as a federal employee. Aka paid employee. (Nepotism arguments would have been made but that was cleared and not disputed with Kushner's appointment). She said due to her unprecedented situation and to alleviate concerns she would take federal employee status while remaining unpaid to alleviate ethic concern violations. The amount of arguing against the supreme court going on here and misreading going on to try and support extraneous arguments is silly. Ivanka is a federal employee by her special arrangements and voluntary agreement. She is bound by ethics via her own choice. Thus, she violated ethics codes due to that (I am unsure how the public office would have worked if she didn't have this agreement. Because technically she would have not been an employee of the federal government and also the idea of public office is nebulously defined). However, that is moot by her agreement. Without such an agreement, the supreme court laws clearly state she would not be considered an employee if it is an unpaid position and did not have clear considerations or retribution down the line to be expected). It is clear as day. Why are you even arguing this extraneous stuff? --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 4:41:49 AM #448 | ChaosTonyV4 posted... Literally what are you arguing for??? Youre wrong dude, she point blank said in 2017 shes an official employee subject to all the same rules. Her pay is totally irrelevant.Correct. She did agree to something voluntarily and both sides agreed to it. It is not consistent with the law. I have already acknowledged she is an employee by her own special voluntary agreement. An unpaid worker is however not an employee otherwise by law (unless benefits or considerations being compensated in return). Unless you knew about that special agreement prior, you should not be arguing otherwise. He didn't. Hence he was RFTWR. Your argument of a DoJ legal opinion is completely extraneous and doesn't matter. Nothing to do with law. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 4:38:41 AM #446 | HashtagSEP posted... Can you read, Corrik?Imagine being so fragile with yourself that you knew you were wrong the entire time (same dude who started out defending Nick Cannon earlier today until I warned him why he shouldn't. ) And then when you end up being right for the wrong reasons you go to wanting a pat on the back for ignore listing. Lol. Wild. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 4:36:44 AM #445 | ChaosTonyV4 posted... Bro in that linked Justice Department OFFICIAL POSITION it explicitly states that advisors have to be informal and outside or be actual Federal employees.That's a legal opinion of a justice department. Legal opinions of a justice department aren't laws. You over here arguing everything Barr announces an opinion on is law. Lol. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 4:35:45 AM #443 | HashtagSEP posted... ...Uh, read the article I posted again. Shes an unpaid employee NOW. She became an unpaid employee. Before that she wasnt anything. Her becoming an unpaid employee is what made her have to follow ethics regulations.Read the supreme court ruling above. Then read the rulings on unpaid federal interns arguing they should be considered employees and being told no. It is really clear cut. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 4:31:53 AM #441 | ChaosTonyV4 posted... https://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/ivanka-trump-federal-employee-unpaid-236657There is like 4 supreme court rulings that all read exactly as I have stated. Educate yourself. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:54:59 AM #438 | StealThisSheen posted... +She's an employeeCorrect for the wrong reasons. You were unequivocally INCORRECT by law standards until you stumbled upon an article you googled 2 minutes prior that talked about a voluntary agreement to abide by rules and take an employee status when she didn't have to. Which, of course, I didn't know existed either or this would have never existed as an argument. But, for the record, you had zero idea this existed either and were arguing from a completely incorrect standpoint. StealThisSheen posted... +As an employee, she must follow the ethics regulationsCorrect. She has to abide by ethics regulations due to voluntarily taking a status as an employee that she did not have to take for the job she was doing. Again. Right for the wrong reasons. She does not have to abide by employee ethics if she did not take that status. That precisely is what had people nervous about her taking the advisor role. Which, your own article showed. StealThisSheen posted... +Her being unpaid does not change her official status as an employee of the executive.This is 100% incorrect as proven by supreme court ruling. Your own article said she took the status of an employee on only to assuage fears of her not having to abide by ethics, which she wouldn't have had to as an unpaid employee under supreme court rulings. StealThisSheen posted... +The NRLA doesn't apply to federal employees The supreme court and the FLSA do apply to federal employees (some FLSA regulations for the executive branch are exempt such as pay standards, but employment existing or not does apply by supreme court ruling). The fact you are reading a NRLA case that is relying on 4 supreme court case rulings in regards to various degrees and the last one being under FLSA standards for what seems employment or not speaks to your own reading comprehension. +The other ruling you were trying to cite (regarding the FLSA pay regulations) also doesn't apply to federal employees of the executive The ruling on what deems an employee or not does. Typical liberal living in an echo chamber. Surprising. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:37:32 AM #432 | StealThisSheen posted... lmao you got so owned you're trying to make up anything you can to scrape up any bit of dignity you can find leftLmfao. I am not sure you are being serious right now. Everything you argued was absolutely wrong besides her being an employee by reasoning you didn't even realize existed until 2 minutes ago. Lmfao. Not sure if serious. If that's your biggest win lololololol. You argued wrong employment status. You misread the legal jargon you posted and what it meant. You argued against supreme court rulings. And ended up being right due to a voluntary decision that in the article itself speaks to the concerns they had due to them understanding the laws better than yourself. Hahahahahaha --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:33:20 AM #430 | So, anyways. Yes, she is a federal employee and has to abide by ethics codes because she voluntarily chose to be a federal employee (likely with expected considerations or compensation down the line). She absolutely could have her role in the government as is and not been a federal employee. You were arguing the whole time oblivious to the laws and the situation, and just happened to be correct because she volunteered to take a status she didn't have to. Lol. And I am disingenuous! You even were arguing against supreme courts and shit. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:28:56 AM #428 | StealThisSheen posted... It's not a special circumstance.That is literally untrue and literally proven by me, and literally proven by your article you linked to. She was "voluntarily" complying with all ethic rules and everyone was concerned if she didn't make that switch (which means she is probably being paid in a benefit or future consideration or such as we discussed before) she wouldn't have to abide by them while in her west wing office as an advisor because she wasn't an employee. Dude, you are arguing against your premise. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:25:18 AM #426 | StealThisSheen posted... Literally from her own fucking mouth.Well, then it appears she agreed to a special circumstance. Which you were completely oblivious to the entire time you were arguing. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:23:25 AM #425 | StealThisSheen posted... Show me where the link you posted talks about federal jobs. The NRLA is private sector. Well, the FLSA applies to federal jobs also. However, I did see this. "The Department of Labors FLSA regulations do not apply to Federal employees of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government, but do apply to some specific organizations that many people think of as Federal Government agencies. These are: The Postal Service, Tennessee Valley Authority, the Postal Rate Commission, and the Library of Congress." So, I will dig into it more. Upon digging into it more, the FLSA regulations on pay and such wouldn't apply to federal employees of the executive branch. Whether an employee or not would not be affected to my knowledge. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:15:46 AM #422 | StealThisSheen posted... Also, your link is about a National Labor Relations Board ruling. The NRLA is only over private sector jobs.In Tony & Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secy of Labor, 471 U.S. 290 (1985), the Supreme Court applied an economic reality test to determine whether individuals were employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The individuals in this case were held to be employees because they expected to and did receive in-kind benefits for their services, but the Court explained that the FLSA excludes individuals who work without promise or expectation of compensation. Dude, they used Supreme Court rulings to come to their answer. Like, you gonna do this all day? --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:13:03 AM #421 | StealThisSheen posted... According to that ruling, you can't receive benefits, either, which she does. So, uh...You can't be expected to receive benefits yes. Like, she can't work for free with the understanding that someone else will work for free for her down the road in return. It doesn't mean she can't have an office or ride on a plane. Unpaid staffers have their own desks or lockers or use of transportation in companies all the time. She can't be expecting to receive a benefit that has a monetary value down the line. Which, I mean, you could definitely argue she is expecting something, but likely as long as it is not agreed upon specifically it wouldn't infringe on whether she is an employee or not. She, however, is not an employee. The question is does she have public office. And, I have no idea because the term seems nowhere clearly defined. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:08:37 AM #418 | That said, I am super curious what "Special government Employee" means. Lol. Sounds like a m-f worker? Which is weird. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 3:04:06 AM #417 | StealThisSheen posted... No. You're wrong. I literally told you how to find out you're wrong.I literally linked you to the supreme court ruling of what an employee is considered. I think you are likely just misunderstanding the use there. "Status as an employee is unaffected by pay or leave status or, in the case of a special Government employee, by the fact that the individual does not perform official duties on a given day." Like this for example says even if the employee is on unpaid assignment of any sort (FMLA, suspension, etc) or leave. They are still an employee. Hence it says "status AS AN EMPLOYEE". I am sure redsox can come in and tell you what that means in legal jargon is NOT what you think it means. She has no status as an employee affected by such things because she is not an employee by literal supreme court ruling on the subject because she is unpaid staff. I think you want that to say something other than it says. I literally linked you the supreme court ruling, dude. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It? |
| Corrik7 07/15/20 2:52:53 AM #414 | StealThisSheen posted... I linked you to the regulation in question I think that is incorrect. https://corporate.findlaw.com/litigation-disputes/unpaid-staff-are-not-employees-under-the-nlra.html So, again, now that we using Conway's recent example can rule out the first violation complaint (as we already did prior but it was insisted on going back because you think if your mailman tells you there is a sale on pork chops that he is committing an ethics violation somehow). It comes down to does she hold public office. Which is again what I was interested in knowing if she does or not from a legal aspect. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) |
| Board List |
