Lurker > Darklit_Minuet

Custer's Revenge
Beat Em And Eat Em

VandorLee posted...

So you have the time to play and watch be played an RPG. I never thought myself as cool but thank you.

Everyone does. It's called prioritizing. We get 24 hours in a day, might as well make good use of them.

It's literally the only genre worth watching a letsplay of.

Seeing the reaction of the letsplayer to the story, how they handle the battle systems, whether they find the most efficient ways to beat a boss or not, etc

Same with penises

CarlGrimes posted...

Mara is the Goddess of Love and Dibella is the Goddess of Sex/Lust.

Mara is literally a giant green penis chariot. How is that not sex/lust

cavalierking posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Because nobody "constantly needs to be under the effects" of marijuana. They might WANT to be, but they don't NEED to be. It's not an addiction. They don't suffer withdrawal. You can't die from not getting high, while you CAN die from immediately cutting off alcohol or heroin.

Source: Was a 2-3 times a day user, between losing my job and moving I haven't had the opportunity to buy more in a few years, and I'm not even remotely inconvenienced by this.

If you can be forced to quit something cold turkey and not feel inconvenienced by it whatsoever, it's not an addiction.

how stupid are you, dude? is everything in this world black and white to you?

you can be addicted to habits, and of course there are varying degrees to addiction (there are degrees to *gasp* pretty much everything, actually)

quit being a pedantic douche

The definitions of words are usually fairly black and white, yeah. Habits and addictions are different things.

addiction
dikSH()n/Submit
noun
the fact or condition of being addicted to a particular substance, thing, or activity.

habit
habt/Submit
noun
1.
a settled or regular tendency or practice, especially one that is hard to give up.

Being hard to give up doesn't make a habit an addiction, seeing as that's literally part of the definition of the word habit.

I apologize if I inconvenienced anyone on that PLANE! But at the same TIME! I am standing up for people who have to deal with companies ripping them OFF and Making you the Suspect; when you Paid for their services.

Can't really argue with that. Why on earth wouldn't they just let her onto the plane? Who cares if she's late, clearly the plane was still there if she got onto it

Negan posted...

So you in particular did not use cannabis enough to become addicted to it, therefore no one can? Is this seriously what you've started an argument for? There are also very, very many people who regularly consume beer or wine without becoming addicted to it, does that mean there's no such thing as alcoholism either?

If using a substance at minimum 2-3 times a day every day for multiple years isn't "enough" to become addicted to it, then your close family member couldn't have been addicted to it in the vastly smaller period of time since your state legalized it.

Negan posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

The hilariously absurd joke is comparing marijuana "addiction" to an actual drug addiction.

Why is a cannabis addiction not an "actual" addiction? Reliance on constantly needing to be under the effects of any behavior-altering substance is always destructive, whether the substance in question is alcohol, marijuana, or even something like heroin. While some substances are obviously more immediately destructive than others, that doesn't mean addictions to the latter somehow aren't problems; I shouldn't have to explain why that logic is faulty.

Because nobody "constantly needs to be under the effects" of marijuana. They might WANT to be, but they don't NEED to be. It's not an addiction. They don't suffer withdrawal. You can't die from not getting high, while you CAN die from immediately cutting off alcohol or heroin.

Source: Was a 2-3 times a day user, between losing my job and moving I haven't had the opportunity to buy more in a few years, and I'm not even remotely inconvenienced by this.

If you can be forced to quit something cold turkey and not feel inconvenienced by it whatsoever, it's not an addiction.

Fuparulez posted...

I remember a man who was attacked by a violent assailant and every bit of evidence pointed straight towards him shooting his assailant in self defense, but what does that have to do with this incident?

I also remember that, but then said man was shot by said violent assailant. You got the two reversed

Racists shooting black people in Florida never get punished. Remember Zimmerman?

Negan posted...

You clearly don't have an answer, but I'll ask again anyway.
Why do you consider drug addiction to be a 'hilariously absurd joke'? Is other peoples' suffering funny to you? Or are just trying to imply a stance on an issue without actually having to commit to it? You can tell me you disagree with me, I won't bite.

I do not consider drug addiction to be a joke whatsoever. I know someone who struggles with it on a daily basis and has been to rehab twice. I can only hope he doesn't ever relapse.

The hilariously absurd joke is comparing marijuana "addiction" to an actual drug addiction.

Why wouldn't it be?

Normally when people tell hilariously absurd jokes, aren't you supposed to laugh at them?

Negan posted...

marijuana addiction

xD oh god

Thanks, I needed a good laugh

Zero_Destroyer posted...

TER was banned because of Metamorphosis

If that were true, he'd have been unbanned when Metamorphosis was banned a year later.

It's cause of the text size

No, I'm pretty sure we were fairly neutral towards him. It's the fact that if he died in office we'd be stuck with the stupidest woman in the country as President that made us terrified.

Blue_Inigo posted...

Reading two or three sentences sure is tough!

It should be illegal to use a font size lower than 10px, regardless where.

FluttershyPony posted...

cant you just make shit up when you use a card since you know your opponent wont actually know what it does?

That's what made season 1 the best. Half the shit they did was made up.

Until they turned it into actual cards

https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/yugioh/images/1/19/AttacktheMoon-SDMY-EN-C-1E.png/revision/latest?cb=20161021200445

They literally banned Thousand Eyes Restrict for the longest time because the card text was too long and nobody wanted to read that shit, he only got unbanned like one or two banlist updates ago because it's the new norm. I think they just forgot to do the same with Relinquished

It won't be for long, unless you live in an extremely backwards country.

Then

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51xIQ-e8tTL.jpg
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/yugioh/images/f/f2/PotofGreed-YGLD-EN-C-1E.png/revision/latest?cb=20170814021753
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/yugioh/images/d/df/MirrorForce-LCKC-EN-UR-1E.png/revision/latest?cb=20180323165538

Now

https://static-3.studiobebop.net/ygo_data/card_images/Nirvana_High_Paladin.jpg
https://static-3.studiobebop.net/ygo_data/card_images/Timaeus_the_Knight_of_Destiny.jpg
https://static-3.studiobebop.net/ygo_data/card_images/Digital_Bug_Corebage.jpg
https://static-3.studiobebop.net/ygo_data/card_images/Beatrice%2C_Lady_of_the_Eternal.jpg
https://static-3.studiobebop.net/ygo_data/card_images/Last_Turn.jpg

Is there like...a meta that bans all cards with more than two lines of effect text? That would be pretty fucking rad. I wanna play cards, not inspect them under a microscope to figure out what the fuck they do

MedzXVIII posted...

Kazi1212 posted...

Atheism merely means the rejection of theism and nothing more. Just because you reject theism doesnt necessarily mean you cant have other mystical or supernatural beliefs

Why would they worship Satan if they reject a higher power?

Why would you be friends with your brother if you reject your genocidal tyrant parents?

Damn_Underscore posted...

Freddie_Mercury posted...

why are progressives intolerant of intolerance

checkmate libs

"Disagreeing with progressives = intolerance"

This is what progressives actually believe

Are they wrong?

Progressives were always on the right side of history, and the opposition was always the intolerant one. When it came to slavery, women, homosexuality, and just about every other social cause that the world has gone through

Hot

For fuck's sake

Let's hope she doesn't try contacting anyone who works in that awful profession a third time.

This is why you don't talk shit about people. Especially evil people.

SSJMegaMawile posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

To be fair a lot of the earth is flat. Not everywhere, some areas have a lot of hills and valleys, but most places are flat

smooth

not flat

We're talking about the planet, not your ex girlfriend

To be fair a lot of the earth is flat. Not everywhere, some areas have a lot of hills and valleys, but most places are flat

averagejoel posted...

Damn_Underscore posted...

Unfortunately for liberals the Democratic Party isn't really a Liberal Party at all

seems pretty damn liberal to me

Then why would they put a Republican-lite like Hillary as their candidate when they could have just gone with Bernie?

Why bother doing everything?

Getting Tidus and Wakka's ultimate weapons are annoying but they're worth it. Lulu and Kimahri...fuck no. I'm not going to dodge lightning bolts to get a sub-par weapon for a character I won't even use in the postgame anyway.

I did just about everything else in the game besides that because I'm not going to waste time on something that doesn't benefit me in any way.

It's not a challenge, it's just tedious.

EpicKingdom_ posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

I don't know if God exists, but if he's anything like the way they portray him in the Bible, I'm on Satan's side. He never flooded the planet or murdered Egyptian babies

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

heaven and hell are both silly things to actually believe in

Sucks for you guys, have fun.

How does it suck for us?

If anything it sucks for you, worshiping such an evil monster

EpicKingdom_ posted...

ConfessPlease posted...

Because people can believe what the fuck they want to believe. What's it you? I don't think why you believe makes sense at all but I'm not going to call you out and judge you like you do.

Literally lol at believing in Satan, but not God.

If Satan exists, so does God.

I don't know if God exists, but if he's anything like the way they portray him in the Bible, I'm on Satan's side. He never flooded the planet or murdered Egyptian babies

Bojack Horseman

MelzezDoor posted...

So what's going on with this show did it suddenly get good or something? How compelling is the story?

It's always been good.

We just had a major plot twist that completely redefined every single character interaction and motivation.

...for like the 10th fucking time. The twists, man

ModLogic posted...

bump to expose the real racists who jumped on the cop without all the facts solely cos of his skin color

For the 50th fucking time, the skin color of both parties is completely irrelevant. Assaulting white people is wrong too.

My Diamond!
Your Diamond!
PINK DIAMOND!

darkjedilink posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Jagermeister513 posted...

George Zimmerman is a violent racist that would be in jail if he didn't decide to assault someone he thought was black and instead assaulted a white kid.

Zimmerman didn't assault anyone

You're right, I misspoke. He just stalked and then murdered him. With a gun.

Not true at all.

It's more true than his bullshit narrative that you sheep have bought

Ping me if you do make it.

I haven't rewatched this entire series in almost 3 weeks, it's about time for another viewing.

scorpion41 posted...

So what do you propose? Politely requesting until the perp either assaults you or walks away? Pretty sure thats not how law enforcement should work.

Net guns.

Capn Circus posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

That's their job to figure out. I don't know what the right way is, just that this is the wrong way.

What a childish mentality.

I'll give you a hint: they've already figured it out.

They "figured out" a bad way to do it. This way isn't acceptable, thus we need to force them to figure out a new way by banning their current way.

Patchwork posted...

Ask.

Tell.

Make.

That's how this works. I ask you to put your hands behind your back. You don't. I tell you to put your hands behind your back. You don't.

Now, I make you put your hands behind your back.

You don't decide, after breaking the law, whether you get arrested or not. And clearly you have no clue what it takes to get someone into handcuffs when they don't want to be

That's fine. Just make them put their hands behind their back without choking, punching, slamming, or otherwise damaging the person you're trying to arrest.

For instance, you may subdue someone using a net gun.

http://www.hendonpub.com/assets/articles/2723/9c0b25ff-db79-49fd-88f1-573e82cfbbd7.jpg

This prevents them from retreating and from assaulting you, without you needing to harm them.

But nope, can't carry net guns around, cops have to carry murder guns instead.

Patchwork posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Funbazooka posted...

The logical conclusion of the far left's shortsightedness would be that authorities should not be allowed to arrest black people when they violate the law.

No. Just that they shouldn't be allowed to assault people, regardless if they broke the law and regardless of their skin color.

Can you stop putting words in our mouths?

What's your game plan when an officer tries to arrest someone and the person resists being handcuffed?

That's their job to figure out. I don't know what the right way is, just that this is the wrong way. They have to figure out a way to do their job without assaulting people.

It's like going to a carpenter and him selling you a wobbly table. I don't know what the proper way to make tables is, but I'm pretty sure that if it's wobbly you're doing it wrong.

Funbazooka posted...

The logical conclusion of the far left's shortsightedness would be that authorities should not be allowed to arrest black people when they violate the law.

No. Just that they shouldn't be allowed to assault people, regardless if they broke the law and regardless of their skin color.

Can you stop putting words in our mouths?

I don't get why image hosting companies purposely make themselves bad after a few years.

TightEnd posted...

situation: man resists arrest and police officers get physical to detain said man

CE: this is racism bc blacks should obviously be able to resist arrest!

That would be racist, nobody is saying only blacks should be able to non-violently resist being thrown into a cage.

I'd be fine with a white kid doing this too, and would also want the cop who assaulted said white kid fired.

Funbazooka posted...

Agnostic420 posted...

Funbazooka posted...

Don't resist arrest. Police will get physical with you if you physically resist arrest.

You didnt watch the video did you? -_-

I did. He's struggling and resisting arrest through the whole video. Flips around so the cop can't get his arms behind his back. He does not comply with the officer trying to get his arms behind his back to cuff him. He even tells the cop to get his hands off him. Straight-up resisting.

There's literally nothing wrong with passive resistance

I'm pretty sure they're illegal here.

But don't different places use different weapons? I'm pretty sure after they banned guns, most kills in the UK are done by the Assault Knife 47

UnfairRepresent posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Jagermeister513 posted...

George Zimmerman is a violent racist that would be in jail if he didn't decide to assault someone he thought was black and instead assaulted a white kid.

Zimmerman didn't assault anyone

You're right, I misspoke. He just stalked and then murdered him. With a gun.