Lurker > Eddv

I would argue that Alicia Fox even in her tragically limited role was better and Kaitlyn as well. Kharma as well, though I guess you might not count her.

Though I would take literally anyone from the Knockouts roster at the time (Gail Kim, Mickie, Tara, ODB, Taryn Tarrell, Madison Rayne, Angelina Love at the very least) over the whole lot of them. Velvet Sky and Brooke Tessmacher were probably worse than Paige and Nikki, but still better than AJ.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

AJ was only top 3 if were only talking WWE , hell perhaps only if were talking about Raw.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

You all suck.

Get rich or die trying suckers.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

At least take it to Chris' topic he seems to invite this stuff.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

C. Gold Girls and Glory
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

xp1337 posted...

There's a lot of "wow" news in these indictments.

https://twitter.com/peterjhasson/status/1017805935400706052

tl;dr: A candidate for US Congress requested and received stolen documents of opponent.

The extent of this is shocking me and I already had a pretty dismal opinion of current events.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

Wow that's...FAIRLY damning
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

I'm taking Okada over a surprisingly game Juice as a method of trying to get over their new US champ
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

Inviso posted...

create a tax plan that disproportionately harms blue states).

This part in particular is way beyond the pale.

This shit is supposed to be checked at the waters edge.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

pyresword posted...

Guys you know many Republicans are real people with real reasons for voting in the way they do, right?

This kind of talk isn't any different to me than the kind of dialogue trying to turn all liberals into Antifa boogeymen which you are calling out Red Sox for.

Sure and let them actually come out and say those reasons instead of this bullshit "my feelings were hurt" line redsox likes to peddle.

SephG comes out and admits its rational self interest because he has a large income. I accept that even if I think some of the things he is willing to accept at the altar of a better marginal tax rate are downright abhorrent.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

Suprak the Stud posted...

I'm not saying he isn't wrong, but the issue with Red Sox insincere pearl clutching is that people like him will always find something to be triggered or outraged by.

This was the reason I got so pissed off when Jakyl called moderate liberals pearl clutchers.

I dont do this shit - this is a right wing tactic used to shield their shit.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

Yup thats some filler alright
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

It's obviously in the best interest of the US for the EU to break up - it's not in our competitive interest to have a competitor unified trading bloc that is just as big economically as the US.

This is the sentence I was reacting to.

The rest is pretty standard rightwing fuckboy talk that I expect from him but this is especially stupid.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

Red Sox is fucking stupid.

That is all.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

Laugh at them for getting conned.

To their faces.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

You're proooobably thinking of this series of committee hearings

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-investigating-1000-white-supremacist-domestic-terrorism-cases/

Which prompted some left wing backlash like this:

https://www.theroot.com/fbi-to-senate-were-investigating-1-000-white-supremaci-1818878694

Basically, the FBI still definitely investigates white supremacists as domestic terrorists but Wray said there's no crime called "domestic terrorism" which makes it hard to quantify which caused others on twitter mostly to make the conclusion you just shared
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

Peace___Frog posted...

metroid composite posted...

But like...fair enough on the FBI--apparently there are a few isolated gangs that use the ICP look and listen to ICP music, and apparently they are spreading.

Yeah, but given that the fbi is no longer investigating white supremacist groups as domestic terrorists.... this just feels like another tactic of other-ing a group of people.

Says who.

Asking for a friend.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

DeepsPraw posted...

second worst major pizza chain. Only Domino's is worse

Nah man Dominos has gotten a lot better.

And the worst is still Hungry Howies.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

I am so glad that mans empire is falling to bits.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

SupremeZero posted...

Paratroopa1 posted...

I'm surprised ammon bundy wasn't imprisoned also

They decided he couldn't receive a fair trial and thus the case was declared a mistrial, therefore acquitting him.

This was the most ridiculous part.

It would be like saying Charles Manson couldn't get a fair trial.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

Paratroopa1 posted...

he seriously pardoned bundy? what the fuck

trump is literally supporting domestic terrorism

Welcome back to my original point.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

Corrik posted...

Yes I strongly agreed with single payer and charity before government safety nets.

Oh no I ultimately said I disagreed with single payer because I do.

SephG is actually right about that - profit drives innovation.

But there are real human costs to that that we need to defray so what we need is an actually functional version of well....Obama/Romneycare
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

I think its important for the GOP to be able to prove that there are situations under which they will call out a member of their own party.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

Corrik posted...

Suprak the Stud posted...

LordoftheMorons posted...

You can easily shift the average to the left on one of these through question selection. Like I mentioned before, having a bunch of questions like do you consider your race to be superior to others is designed to do this. You could also do the reverse and push people to the right by including stuff like people should not be allowed to own property.

Mm. That's a good point.

My main issue is where they are placing the actual candidates, because they don't match up at all. Their questions aren't always great like you point out, and seem to be forcing people to the left with a series of layup questions.

This isn't a layup left question. Some people do believe this.

There are questions EDDV referenced earlier as layups to the left as had to be answered in disagreement that I agreed or strongly agreed on for instance.

You Agreed or Strongly Agreed that Private Charity should provide what the government currentlt provides as social safety net?

Either you don't fully appreciate everything that entails or you just like really think the beginning of every dickens novel sounds like heavenm
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

This should be an easy one for Republicans hoping to prove that standing by trump ISNT just driven by partisanism.

"See look we threw the kiddie diddler under the bus!"
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

Every Single Republican who voted for the Tax Bill for one.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1016958695211560960?s=19

Keep your eye on Kelly in this one.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

I think functionally A and B are pretty similar except that A might have a marginal chancr of killing the hippo and B will preserve more backliners lives.

I happen to quite like Owen so I was voting B, but I see A as valid.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

If Matsuda and Punchs players want to vote A I will vote A with them btw.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

B. Cut your losses, preserve Owen.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

I dunno I just read Chuck Wendig describing the behavior of a dopey grass carrying wasp that's gonna be hard to top

*clicks tweet*

Bahahaha
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

They aren't lies theyre just hypothetical.

Like sure, run again.

I just expect him to lose again too.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

It was done in their names but iirc they also asked for it to be done in their names.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

1) 3 of those people lost, one of them didnt even really run for president and one of those people isnt actually expected to win the presidency

2) Because we just keep on fucking relitigating it.

Its not "he lost but we are regrouping and plan to try again after refining our message". That is basically just politics 101.

Its this "he didn't really lose because we, the obviously correct and more popular socialists, were robbed" narrative that I find disgusting.

Its the exact same line of shit being peddled by the alt right, its just different to you because you agree with socialism.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

Oh I can wax poetic on it

A pair of dudes who set fire to a national park and then proceeded to lead a militia to occupy it for 40 days after which they were somehow taken alive and were merely sentenced to prison for all the grief they caused were just SET FREE because what they did MILDLY aligns with the Presidents politics.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

We already did find out.

He pretty handily lost the primary election.

I dont know why no one but fucking Bernie Sanders gets a pass on this

No one is saying "oh if only John Kasich got another shot he would surely have beaten not just Trump buy Hillary too".

Kasich plans to run in 2020 and he doesnt even register on most Vegas odds as a long shot!
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

I mean its important for the agency in charge of tracking reality go back up the assertions that everyone made.

I just am pessmistic its gonna land.

I mean hell....Trump pardoned a literal pair of terrorists a couple days ago and no one even blinked.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

SmartMuffin posted...

I feel like the success of GLOW might eventually lead to greater mainstream interest in a product such as LU.

I feel like there is a hunger for cheeseball wrestling. If anything LU doesn't go far enough!
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

Globalism btw isnt a left/right issue.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

NY Times put out an article EVISCERATING Boris for being an absolute clown today.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

The main question I have is cost.

They are paying WWE a TON per episode.

If they could produce a product that drew even 50% of the WWE audience they could probably do so at a quarter of the per episode cost they are giving wwe.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

Inviso posted...

Corrik posted...

Inviso posted...

Eddv and Regaro are both conservatives

Man, am I just super surprised Eddv was to the left in the quiz and not the conservative proclaimed here.

With Eddv, I think it's a lot like what happened with me. He was a lot more centrist and moderate, but the past two years have kinda informed us that modern conservatism (at least what is mistakenly referred to as conservatism and no reactionary extremism) is actually kinda dangerous to the modern world, and maybe we can afford to move more towards the left.

Sure theres some of that.

Theres also some like "all social programs should be abolished in favor of charity" questions that are SO LOADED.

Or like on healthcare they merely present like Single Payer or Nothing.

There were a lot of abstentions for me on those questions where the ability to answer more moderately would have likely dragged me slightly rightward on axis 1.

Axis 2 looks spot on to me

Axis 3 is a weird one because I felt the need to more strongly assert a right to the free press now vs what I answered the last time I took the test in 2015 but its honestly pretty close.

Other than a strongly pro science bent I come out looking fairly moderate here, which is pretty much how I see myself and have always presented myself - as a conservative democrat who would vote for a Romney or McCain if they ran against a Sanders type.

Moderate vs Moderate I tend to go Democrat due to Republican hostility towards science is all.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=56.7&d=60.3&g=53.8&s=66.3

My 8vals.

A little bit further left than I thought but the questions I feel were a little loaded that direction on the topic of markets vs socialism
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

I have slowly become convinced that 1 hour of television per week is about the best wwe can do without fucking it up.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

If you think you saw yourself cross the Ulti line its usually because you have.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

XIII_rocks posted...

Corbyn is more of a eurosceptic than May is. It's not necessarily a left/right issue, although the fact that immigration is such a big part of it means it trends right.

And yes, the government can easily just say "nah" to Brexit, but y'know, WILL OF THE PEOPLE

Can't half-ass it either, though I guess a soft brexit would be the closest thing. But we're kind of either in or out, we can't be in between.

To me the most insane part is that it was ever going to hinge on a simple majority vote.

David Cameron is fucking daft.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

GuessMyUserName posted...

LinkMarioSamus posted...

Changing topic a little, I like how whenever Trump does anything that especially gets on my nerves something comes along to distract me from that (Anita Sarkeesian basically confirming herself as a bigoted monster last year and the whole stereotyping Star Wars fans as racist/sexist this year).

And the left wonder why they are such a laughingstock.

according to the multiple alignment polls of the other poli topic I'm the biggest lefty on the board and I don't like Sarkeesian at all and I think the stupid toxic star wars fans are getting a bloated amount of attention than they're worth (see: Remake TLJ) and people are falling for blatant trolls (see: We, The Fans of Star Wars) since the "controversy" is such incredibly easy bait now

Twitter liberals literally dont realize that by accepting the terms of the identity debate the way they do that they literally cast themselves as the minority.

Like the way to combat white supremacy isn't by attacking white supremacy directly - that's hardly going to change peoples minds because if they arent prima facie rejecting it then continuing to contest it on those terms is futile.

The way to combat is just by having a different, better idea that draws them away from it.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

DoomTheGyarados posted...

https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=61.6&d=60.6&g=66.9&s=80.9

No surprises here.

Something I find really interesting is how different people interpret the Tradition axis.

To many Americans, tradition encompasses like Norman Rockwell, women in the kitchen, even Jim Crow/Slavery. But I know a bunch of Canadians who took it and to them respecting traditions might have connotations like respecting native culture and such.

Just a weird divide!
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

FWIW the lame duck session refers to

1) a discreet time period between November and January when a new president/congress has been elected and the new President/Congress is sworn in.

It was historically a bigger deal but they moved inauguration back from March til January

2) the term is sometimes used to refer to a President who still holds office but has no prospect of his party forming a majority in any house of government and usually entails a President being fairly unpopular such that opposing his policy initiatives would be politically priceless for either party (think W in 2007).

Should be noted that this is not the normal usage of the term and any use of the term for purposes other than the first definition is usually as a jab at the politician in question for being ineffectual.
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06

That'll be Thursday yeah?
---

Board 8's Voice of Reason
https://imgur.com/chXIw06