Lurker > averagejoel

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1 ... 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 56
TopicProper noun ends in S. You're trying to use the possessive.
averagejoel
02/02/18 5:42:50 PM
#5
both are correct, but I tend to use the version with just the apostrophe
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs gentrification a bad thing?
averagejoel
02/02/18 5:42:05 PM
#9
people are more important than property value.

if you accept this premise, then you have to accept that gentrification is bad.
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 5:40:35 PM
#127
COVxy posted...
I mean, do you have any evidence of that at all? It seems that those who go through early ABA fair better on almost all outcome measures, including metrics of adaptive behavior and IQ, which if it were torture, you wouldn't predict.

it's not really relevant if they do better on the outcome measures, because a major part of the problem is that the outcome measures themselves are flawed. they're basically measuring how well an autistic person can pretend to be neurotypical. if you punish typical autistic behaviours and reward neurotypical ones, of course you're going to see results in that respect.

COVxy posted...
How so? I mean, ABA is literally just taking the basic science of learning and applying it to shape behavior. In almost any case of treatment, there's going to be some form of ABA, even if it is implicit.

TEACCH, what people call the cognitive model, doesn't seem to actually be orthogonal, and incorporates a lot of the ABA practices. Even what people rate as useful across them happens to be the overlap between the two.

Also, in examining evidence for this model, the evidence is shaky in comparison to the results seen with ABA.

admittedly I don't know that much about TEACCH, but the stuff that I've seen suggests that their methodology and goals are much better than ABA. I've also heard good things about Floortime.
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 4:33:31 PM
#125
Esrac posted...
averagejoel posted...
COVxy posted...
averagejoel posted...
far more often, the behaviour has no negative effects other than embarrassing the kid's mother in public.


I mean, it's nice and naive that you think that's the height of severity when it comes to autistic behavior, but it certainly is not.

I never said that, or anything that suggested that. please don't put words in my mouth.


You have been suggesting that this entire topic when you reduce therapy and treatment of abnotmal or maladaptive behavior stemming from autism as abusing children to save their parents from public embarrassment and make neurotypical people feel better.

If you can't or won't acknowledge that's what you've been doing, you're either deluded or disingenuous.

there is another option that you're not considering
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 4:29:56 PM
#124
COVxy posted...
averagejoel posted...
I never said that, or anything that suggested that. please don't put words in my mouth.


I'm not. We're talking about treatment of autism which you have declared to be unilaterally inhumane.

The way in which you've done this is to try to minimize the behavior, and pretend like the only reason anyone thinks it's negative is because it embarrasses them. Essentially, you are pretending like the behavior is completely fine, and that the treatment for behavioral adjustments are essentially torturing a normal individual into acting the way that is sanctioned by society. It's a complete misrepresentation of the disorder.

in that case, let me be quite clear:

the majority of typical autistic mannerisms are perfectly fine and do not harm anyone.
the ones that aren't do not merit ABA, which is abusive.

there are ways of teaching autistic children that do not involve ABA.

you should try reading stuff by actual autistic people who are informed about these issues, because, as exhibited in this topic, there are very few neurotypicals who get it.

Tyranthraxus posted...
no it's literally the opposite of cool

my point was that I don't care.
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 4:17:13 PM
#120
COVxy posted...
averagejoel posted...
far more often, the behaviour has no negative effects other than embarrassing the kid's mother in public.


I mean, it's nice and naive that you think that's the height of severity when it comes to autistic behavior, but it certainly is not.

I never said that, or anything that suggested that. please don't put words in my mouth.
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 4:10:26 PM
#117
Tyranthraxus posted...
averagejoel posted...
COVxy posted...
Except the behavior often either harms them or prevents them from performing everyday tasks, things as simple as brushing their teeth.

Like, I think the reasoning here is pretty simple.

far more often, the behaviour has no negative effects other than embarrassing the kid's mother in public.

I've seen kids throw tantrums in public that have gotten CPS called on their parents because of this "embarassing behavior"

cool.
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 4:05:46 PM
#115
COVxy posted...
Except the behavior often either harms them or prevents them from performing everyday tasks, things as simple as brushing their teeth.

Like, I think the reasoning here is pretty simple.

far more often, the behaviour has no negative effects other than embarrassing the kid's mother in public.
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 3:43:50 PM
#112
COVxy posted...
That is not the current state of the literature, no.

the term "aspergers" is literally named after a eugenicist

It's based on things like "there's a reduction of this behavior that is either harmful or debilitating."

You are overly invested in describing abnormal behavior as normal to thereby call research into reducing it inhumane.

you're overly invested in characterizing every typical autistic behaviour as harmful or debilitating to thereby invalidate the experiences of actual autistic people. see? I can do this too
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 3:13:22 PM
#110
COVxy posted...
averagejoel posted...
ok, seriously, read the first 20 pages of Neurotribes and it'll sort you out


No it won't, because it's a silly point. All characteristics lie on a spectrum, but if any one of them is too extreme it ends in maladaptive behavior.

Like scientists score higher on autism scales than the average population, but nobody would consider the vast majority of these people (other than those who meet diagnostic criteria) autistic.

Pretending like people with autism are just like anyone else is not actually helpful. They need treatment, and hopefully some form of preventative medicine (if it really is due to prenatal development, like hyperserotonemia, for example, this could be detected and blunted).

I'm not pretending autistic people are "just like" anyone else - they aren't even "just like" each other. I'm not sure where you're getting that idea from. autistic people are not lesser than neurotypicals, but that doesn't mean they're the same.

the history of "treatment" of autism is a lot like the history of "treatment" of homosexuality - it just causes more severe issues in the "treated" individuals. it doesn't help. most of the science surrounding autism is literally based on eugenics, so this should not be surprising.

the whole methodology of determining whether ABA was "successful" or not is extremely centered on neurotypicals interacting with autistic people, rather than on the autistic people themselves. it's based on things like "this person stopped flapping their hands and embarrassing me in public, so that means this treatment must have worked."
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 2:20:35 PM
#108
COVxy posted...
And this is just the original point I was talking about. You dislike them primarily because they view autism as a disorder rather than an individual difference (which, I reiterate, is ridiculous and dangerous).

ok, seriously, read the first 20 pages of Neurotribes and it'll sort you out
---
peanut butter and dick
Topichas anyone ever said that your SO is too good for you?
averagejoel
02/02/18 1:55:18 PM
#5
no

I don't receive many comments about my hand
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 1:53:49 PM
#105
COVxy posted...
averagejoel posted...
you should try listening to autistic people. you might learn something


I mean, this is kinda a non-response. If the criticism you have of that organization goes further than what I outlined, then I'd love to know.

Also, if you are going to be snarky about being empathetic, you could at least use person first language. =P

well for one thing they don't have any autistic people on their board of directors

fo another, they largely devote their funds to finding a "cure" for autism when it could be better spent providing assistance to autistic people and their families.

also, side note: the majority of autistic people prefer identity-first
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 1:47:56 PM
#104
foreverzero212 posted...
averagejoel posted...
foreverzero212 posted...
Agreed. When I want to learn about a mental "disorder" I only listen to people with that mental "disorder." Disorder is just a social construct and doesn't exist.

great job putting things into my mouth that I never said.

there's tons of scientific literature about autism that's written by autistic people - Steve Silberman's Neurotribes is an excellent place to start

I am of aware of that literature because I only learn about mental "disorders" from people with mental "disorders." You act as if we are in disagreement, but we continue to agree.

oh. I read your post as sarcastic. sorry
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 1:00:04 PM
#101
foreverzero212 posted...
Agreed. When I want to learn about a mental "disorder" I only listen to people with that mental "disorder." Disorder is just a social construct and doesn't exist.

great job putting things into my mouth that I never said.

there's tons of scientific literature about autism that's written by autistic people - Steve Silberman's Neurotribes is an excellent place to start
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 12:11:35 PM
#99
COVxy posted...
averagejoel posted...
that's far from the only reason


It's literally the only criticism I've seen of the organization. And it's not like a lot of it doesn't fly past my newsfeed. The primary focus of the criticism is the ostrasizing nature of being labeled disordered in need of treatment.

My guess, though, is that the large majority of this criticism comes from people who have put themselves on the spectrum or ran away with a statement like "you're a bit above average in autism like behaviors", rather than people who have legitimate experience with the disorder to begin with.

you should try listening to autistic people. you might learn something
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 12:02:42 PM
#97
COVxy posted...
averagejoel posted...
Autism Speaks is a shitty organization that doesn't actually do anything to help autistic people


You only say this because they advocate for the treatment of autism as a disorder, which it is, rather than uncritical acceptance.

that's far from the only reason
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 11:55:39 AM
#95
C7D posted...
averagejoel posted...
C7D posted...
averagejoel posted...
C7D posted...
averagejoel posted...
C7D posted...
Is it better to leave them locked in a padded room or to let them kill themselves? Honest question...

false dichotomy. there are ways to help autistic people that do not involve leaving them "locked in a padded room"


Not in the people that are receiving this therapy... Its a last ditch effort after everything else has been tried. When the brain is undergoing catatonia, the kid doesnt even know they are hurting themselves. The brains electrical signals are messed up. These people are fixing them.

they're not being fixed. read the thing i linked up there ^


I read it. The author clearly lacks the prerequisite knowledge to know what she is talking about. She was not nor is she currently an expert on autism. She freely admits this in the blog. My wife was once a leader for a national autism advocacy group. She used some, not all of the techniques discussed in the article herself to make life livable for our son. He no longer hurts himself of others and talks when neurologists said he never would speak. The bigger trick now is getting him to stop. Some, most all of this stuff works as it is intended to. Sit down.

was it an actual autism advocacy group, or was it Autism Speaks? because they are famously bad

She has held leadership positions both with Autism Speaks and National Autism Association though she is no longer active in either.

yeah I'm not sure about NAA, but Autism Speaks is a shitty organization that doesn't actually do anything to help autistic people
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 11:29:23 AM
#93
C7D posted...
averagejoel posted...
C7D posted...
averagejoel posted...
C7D posted...
Is it better to leave them locked in a padded room or to let them kill themselves? Honest question...

false dichotomy. there are ways to help autistic people that do not involve leaving them "locked in a padded room"


Not in the people that are receiving this therapy... Its a last ditch effort after everything else has been tried. When the brain is undergoing catatonia, the kid doesnt even know they are hurting themselves. The brains electrical signals are messed up. These people are fixing them.

they're not being fixed. read the thing i linked up there ^


I read it. The author clearly lacks the prerequisite knowledge to know what she is talking about. She was not nor is she currently an expert on autism. She freely admits this in the blog. My wife was once a leader for a national autism advocacy group. She used some, not all of the techniques discussed in the article herself to make life livable for our son. He no longer hurts himself of others and talks when neurologists said he never would speak. The bigger trick now is getting him to stop. Some, most all of this stuff works as it is intended to. Sit down.

was it an actual autism advocacy group, or was it Autism Speaks? because they are famously bad
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 11:19:23 AM
#91
C7D posted...
averagejoel posted...
C7D posted...
Is it better to leave them locked in a padded room or to let them kill themselves? Honest question...

false dichotomy. there are ways to help autistic people that do not involve leaving them "locked in a padded room"


Not in the people that are receiving this therapy... Its a last ditch effort after everything else has been tried. When the brain is undergoing catatonia, the kid doesnt even know they are hurting themselves. The brains electrical signals are messed up. These people are fixing them.

they're not being fixed. read the thing i linked up there ^
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 11:17:29 AM
#90
COVxy posted...
averagejoel posted...
COVxy posted...
averagejoel posted...
cool. ABA is abusive regardless of which behaviours they target


Right, modifying behavior to be less harmful is abuse. Gotchya.

don't do this. it's disingenuous. you usually have a good track record for being reasonable. read the link i posted. educate yourself


No, I understand the methodologies. It's not abuse, you just see it as attacking your identity.

Further, you should really calm down on your criticism of ECT. It's really effective on several types of disorders, probably because of the influx of BDNF after changing the properties of the blood brain barrier.


The evidence regarding success rates of ABA is skewed. the autistic individual is not usually interviewed at the end of the treatment, the neurotypical parents are. So, a parent that can't stand their autistic kid can say "much improvement! They don't stim or embarrass me anymore!" Though the autistic child is suffering at higher rates from anxiety and often times PTSD.

it's solely related to how traumatized a kid can be into acting neurotypical

autistic people generally know that ABA is harmful. you should try listening to them directly instead of the people who put them through it
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 10:55:41 AM
#85
COVxy posted...
averagejoel posted...
cool. ABA is abusive regardless of which behaviours they target


Right, modifying behavior to be less harmful is abuse. Gotchya.

don't do this. it's disingenuous. you usually have a good track record for being reasonable. read the link i posted. educate yourself
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 10:51:08 AM
#83
C7D posted...
Is it better to leave them locked in a padded room or to let them kill themselves? Honest question...

false dichotomy. there are ways to help autistic people that do not involve leaving them "locked in a padded room"
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicFox disproves the pee tape once and for all
averagejoel
02/02/18 10:49:18 AM
#3
Chicken posted...
pee tape?

about a year ago, there was a rumour that Trump was into golden showers and that there was a video of him on the act
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 10:47:16 AM
#81
COVxy posted...
And yet they are the core behavior that ABA targets, most often.

cool. ABA is abusive regardless of which behaviours they target

C7D posted...
Oh wait... it actually works about 90% of the time. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/self-harming-behavior-in-children-with-autism-can-electroconvulsive-therapy-help

Whats better: a kid killing him self from self injuring or shocking him every now and again so he doesnt continue to injure himself?

Fortunately for you, you dont have to make that choice and get to sit back in the catbird seat judging their parenting methodologies.

ABA is abuse, regardless of whether or not it works. it's not done to help autistic people; it's done for the convenience of neurotypicals
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 10:32:24 AM
#78
COVxy posted...
averagejoel posted...
this topic started out extremely close to eugenics, and arrived there within the first few posts


Doesn't make stating that autism is perfectly normal and healthy a moronic statement.

Yeah, like just let your child bash their head into the wall repeatedly until they have additional brain damage! Just normal behavior!

self-harming behaviours are not what I was talking about. please don't pretend that they are the only behaviours typical of autistic people
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 10:30:12 AM
#77
C7D posted...
At least they are doing something. Are their methods flawed? I dont know. I dont concern myself with them as they dont matter until they come up with something that works. Im betting they werent experimenting with kids without their parental consent.

what do you mean you don't know? the guy who invented ABA literally used electroshock "therapy" to try and "cure" it

and parents of autistic children are often shitty and abusive too, so "parental consent" is generally not an issue

you should read the link i posted previously in this topic
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 10:24:08 AM
#74
COVxy posted...
averagejoel posted...
autism is not a disease, and attempts to find a "cure" have not ended well for autistic people, as I'm sure you know.

the "behavioral symptoms" are not problems. they're legitimate coping mechanisms, usually to deal with sensory overload. when deprived of these mechanisms, autistic people can be put in a great deal of distress. most autistic people who went through this stuff have PTSD or C-PTSD stemming from it.

the fact that you want her to "perform" in society, rather than be appreciated for who she is, is an indication that you are part of the problem. there are plenty of autistic people who can be themselves and live ordinary lives. the important thing is making your household more accessible to her, rather than trying to change who she is (as I mentioned, you won't change who she is, and this disconnect causes actual mental health issues). this therapy is not done to help autistic people; it's to make neurotypical people feel better about themselves.

I am autistic, and I am 100% confident that I'm more informed on these issues than you are.


This post was not only stupid but harmful.

this topic started out extremely close to eugenics, and arrived there within the first few posts
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicDid Netflix change their rating system because of Amy Schumer?
averagejoel
02/02/18 10:16:26 AM
#12
how was it changed?
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 10:14:59 AM
#72
C7D posted...
averagejoel posted...

autism is not a disease, and attempts to find a "cure" have not ended well for autistic people, as I'm sure you know.

the "behavioral symptoms" are not problems. they're legitimate coping mechanisms, usually to deal with sensory overload. when deprived of these mechanisms, autistic people can be put in a great deal of distress. most autistic people who went through this stuff have PTSD or C-PTSD stemming from it.

the fact that you want her to "perform" in society, rather than be appreciated for who she is, is an indication that you are part of the problem. there are plenty of autistic people who can be themselves and live ordinary lives. the important thing is making your household more accessible to her, rather than trying to change who she is (as I mentioned, you won't change who she is, and this disconnect causes actual mental health issues). this therapy is not done to help autistic people; it's to make neurotypical people feel better about themselves.

I am autistic, and I am 100% confident that I'm more informed on these issues than you are.


The fact of the matter is the people with autism live in a neurotypical world. It is disingenuous at best and harmful at worst to suggest that society is going to accommodate people from cradle to grave. That just isnt real. We have to let all people know what behaviors are acceptable regardless of any underlying disability.

While calling someone less human because they have autism is certainly out of line, trying to come up with new ways to help them integrate into the world without the world having to integrate for them is a much better way of handling things than the alternative.

I have Aspergers and my stepson is autistic. One of the things I had to wrap my head around before I married my wife was the realization that he will be living with us for the rest of our lives or at least until he moves in with one of his brothers, that there will be social cues he will never figure out, and that he probably wont ever be able to hold down a real job.

Dont sit back and pretend that you possess some moral superiority and that people bring autistic kids closer to the real world is harming them. We train our son to be able to do basic things which will hopefully allow him to do for himself. Someday he may have to be able to do so.

ok? parents teaching their kids to do stuff is not at all the same as ABA, which was what I was talking about.

also FYI "asperger's" is now called "high functioning autism", a label which has its own problems, but is better than labelling it as distinct from other autism spectrum disorders
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicI didn't get my first job until I was 21.
averagejoel
02/02/18 2:16:27 AM
#8
my first actual employment was as a museum curator when i was 18. a summer job after graduating high school.
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicITT: Let's create the worst scenario imaginable in a video game.
averagejoel
02/02/18 2:07:48 AM
#13
the person you're escorting moves independently of you, slightly faster than your "slow" but significantly slower than your "fast"
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/02/18 1:48:14 AM
#67
Esrac posted...
averagejoel posted...
Esrac posted...
averagejoel posted...
Esrac posted...
I have a young daughter with autism. She attends ABA therapy five days a week.

If I could just cure her autism outright, instead of years of therapy, I would without a second thought.

ABA is legitimately damaging and traumatizing to autistic children. if you care about her, get her out of there


I'm not inclined to take you at your word.

it's basically dog training for humans. it won't "cure" your daughter's autism. it won't make her neurotypical. all it does is train her out of perfectly legitimate behaviours just because they're stigmatized as "weird". it's abuse

"You see, you start pretty much from scratch when you work with an autistic child. You have a person in the physical sense - they have hair, a nose and a mouth - but they are not people in the psychological sense. One way to look at the job of helping autistic kids is to see it as a matter of constructing a person. You have the raw materials, but you have to build the person."
-Ivar Lovaas, the founder of ABA

Lovaas literally said that he didn't believe autistics were "as human" as neurotypicals, and supported the use of electroshock therapy on patients. this "therapy" is all based on his ideas.

I highly recommend reading this, as well as the follow-up piece linked at the top:
https://madasbirdsblog.wordpress.com/2017/04/03/i-abused-children-for-a-living/


I'm aware of what it is. That it won't cure her autism, as there currently are no cures, but is therapy for the behavioral symptoms that stem from her autism. That they're working to encourage more socially functional behavior. That's not abuse, that's trying to help her get to a point where she'll hopefully be able to perform in society with other people.

You don't know what you're talking about and I'm not interested in some little blog you read.

autism is not a disease, and attempts to find a "cure" have not ended well for autistic people, as I'm sure you know.

the "behavioral symptoms" are not problems. they're legitimate coping mechanisms, usually to deal with sensory overload. when deprived of these mechanisms, autistic people can be put in a great deal of distress. most autistic people who went through this stuff have PTSD or C-PTSD stemming from it.

the fact that you want her to "perform" in society, rather than be appreciated for who she is, is an indication that you are part of the problem. there are plenty of autistic people who can be themselves and live ordinary lives. the important thing is making your household more accessible to her, rather than trying to change who she is (as I mentioned, you won't change who she is, and this disconnect causes actual mental health issues). this therapy is not done to help autistic people; it's to make neurotypical people feel better about themselves.

I am autistic, and I am 100% confident that I'm more informed on these issues than you are.
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicThe numbers are coming out: Very few ppl actually get $1000 ONE-TIME bonuses ..
averagejoel
02/01/18 11:27:15 PM
#2
they also laid off a huge number of their workers after announcing the bonus
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicITT: I explain the basics of socialism
averagejoel
02/01/18 11:23:06 PM
#179
interesting article that I just found: if you use the methodology of the Black Book of Communism for the Great Depression, you get 7 million dead

http://www.pravdareport.com/world/americas/19-05-2008/105255-famine-0/
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicWhat would women do if dey were male for a day?
averagejoel
02/01/18 10:47:34 PM
#5
probably walk around at night with earbuds in
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicITT: I explain the basics of socialism
averagejoel
02/01/18 10:45:25 PM
#173
essentially, your mindset is so far removed from anything that resembles socialist dialectics; so brainwashed by the current system to think that a better one is impossible, that I would have to impart several university courses' worth of material into your brain to adequately address it.

a ton of your post was simply stating the way things function under capitalism as though that was an argument in favour of it.

you don't seem to be capable of distinguishing between private property and personal property, which are extremely important concepts in socialist thought

you made a point about how it's "unfair" to rich people to have the state seize their vacant homes to give to homeless people, making it pretty clear that you value money over people. (FYI I consider it immoral, if there are homeless people and vacant homes in an area, for that to NOT happen)

you even somehow managed to spin Cuba's high literacy rate as a bad thing

there's just too much disingenuous stuff coming from your end for me to merit a legitimate overall response
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicITT: I explain the basics of socialism
averagejoel
02/01/18 10:24:28 PM
#168
FLUFFYGERM posted...
averagejoel posted...
FLUFFYGERM posted...
1 dollar in my pocket is NOT 1 dollar less in your pocket.

not MY pocket, but SOMEONE's pocket. that money has to come from somewhere.


It comes from intellectual property, resources, asset creation, all kinds of things...

If someone were to give me $100 and I used that money to build a drone that could mine precious metals out of the moon and bring those precious metals back to earth, I'd be introducing new wealth into the system. Both in terms of net resources available in the market and in terms of dollars that go into the global economy.

1 dollar in my pocket doesn't have to mean that someone was exploited or robbed, even on your really strict definition of exploitation (which I disagree with).

any wealth introduced into the system via this method would be offset ten times by the cost of the fuel used to get the drone to the moon in the first place
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicITT: I explain the basics of socialism
averagejoel
02/01/18 10:17:42 PM
#164
FLUFFYGERM posted...
1 dollar in my pocket is NOT 1 dollar less in your pocket.

not MY pocket, but SOMEONE's pocket. that money has to come from somewhere.
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicITT: I explain the basics of socialism
averagejoel
02/01/18 10:11:20 PM
#162
FLUFFYGERM posted...
TC did anything in this topic make you think that you were wrong or that you need more nuance in your positions? Just curious.

a couple of them might require more nuance

a big hang-up for me is that you think one dollar will just magically turn into a thousand dollars, that you think infinite wealth can be generated somehow because of this, and that you base your critique of socialism on this objectively incorrect line of reasoning.

I'm legitimately not sure how to respond to your post knowing that you believe that
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/01/18 8:33:17 PM
#64
Esrac posted...
averagejoel posted...
Esrac posted...
I have a young daughter with autism. She attends ABA therapy five days a week.

If I could just cure her autism outright, instead of years of therapy, I would without a second thought.

ABA is legitimately damaging and traumatizing to autistic children. if you care about her, get her out of there


I'm not inclined to take you at your word.

it's basically dog training for humans. it won't "cure" your daughter's autism. it won't make her neurotypical. all it does is train her out of perfectly legitimate behaviours just because they're stigmatized as "weird". it's abuse

"You see, you start pretty much from scratch when you work with an autistic child. You have a person in the physical sense - they have hair, a nose and a mouth - but they are not people in the psychological sense. One way to look at the job of helping autistic kids is to see it as a matter of constructing a person. You have the raw materials, but you have to build the person."
-Ivar Lovaas, the founder of ABA

Lovaas literally said that he didn't believe autistics were "as human" as neurotypicals, and supported the use of electroshock therapy on patients. this "therapy" is all based on his ideas.

I highly recommend reading this, as well as the follow-up piece linked at the top:
https://madasbirdsblog.wordpress.com/2017/04/03/i-abused-children-for-a-living/
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicGlobe and Mail had a really good article about Jordan Peterson
averagejoel
02/01/18 8:13:09 PM
#9
CruorComa posted...
No one ever really addresses anything he says, do they? They just condense complex subject matter to overly simplified, uncharitable and misrepresentative strawfigures, then attack that. It's not impressive.

he said, after reading an article that succinctly addresses what he says
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicGlobe and Mail had a really good article about Jordan Peterson
averagejoel
02/01/18 7:52:28 PM
#3
A dumb joke, maybe. But an edifying one. (Jokes, as Freud knew, are frequently revealing; "an envelope for thoughts of the greatest substance.") Jordan Peterson is the intellectual as guru-mystic, and the guru-mystic as shameless huckster. He maintains that he abhors "right-wing identitarians" while simultaneously baiting them, materially profiting off their interest, and bequeathing their misguided movement the illusion of intellectual heft. He has also spoken giddily about his ability to "monetize social justice warriors," by converting outrage against him into more online donations. He is an intellectual snake oil salesman, exploiting a genuine need (pointed among the young men who shore the ranks of Peterson disciples) for meaning and order. His aim is little more than the pursuit of his own vanity and the P.T. Barnum-ish padding of his own pockets. He is a prophet, for profit.

That he has been hailed as the West's "most influential public intellectual" speaks despairingly to the state of the Western world. Anyone tempted to take him seriously, on his own terms, as some brainiac Ubermensch dispelling the gathering clouds of chaos would do well to keep in mind the image of a sallow man, slumped at a desk in his Native American-inspired attic longhouse, angrily Googling "bikini" first thing in the morning, desperate in the hope that it really, genuinely means something.


https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/the-jordan-peterson-paradox-high-intellect-or-just-another-angry-white-guy/article37806524/
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicGlobe and Mail had a really good article about Jordan Peterson
averagejoel
02/01/18 7:52:04 PM
#2
Where other academics rise on the strength of their ideas, Peterson's fame has crested on their sheer proliferation. As with his online lectures, his new book is rangy and digressive, addressing a wide range of subjects (history, theology, critical theory, evolutionary biology) well outside his realm of professional expertise. He can skip from the journals of the Columbine shooters to Goethe within three sentences; and within three pages skips to Tolstoy, to Cain and Abel, to Christ Himself, and back to "the Columbine boys." If psychology has always been the smorgasbord of soft sciences, Peterson's brand of profundity is the sprawling, all-you-can-eat Mandarin buffet a medley of undercooked ideas warmed under the heat lamp of his own faintly flickering intellect.

As recently as early 2016, Peterson was a cultural non-entity, virtually unknown outside of the University of Toronto, where he works as a professor of psychology. (The closest he had come to a celebrity breakout came more than a decade ago, when TVOntario commissioned a 13-part lecture series based on his 1999 book Maps Of Meaning.)

Then, Bill C-16, an amendment to the Canadian Human Rights Act to enshrine legal protections on the basis of gender identity, turned Peterson into a glowering cause clbre. "I will never use words I hate," Peterson wrote, "like the trendy and artificially constructed words 'zhe' and 'zher.' These words are at the vanguard of a post-modern, radical leftist ideology that I detest, and which is, in my professional opinion, frighteningly similar to the Marxist doctrines that killed at least 100 million people in the 20th century."

For Peterson, the decency of recognizing people by their preferred pronouns leads irrevocably to the gulag. And not an intellectual or metaphorical gulag. But the actual gulag. Fitting, then, that in 12 Rules for Life he finds a hero in Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, whose epic history of Soviet forced labour, The Gulag Archipelago is praised by Peterson as, "a forceful, terrible book, written with the overwhelming moral force of unvarnished truth." Peterson casts himself as such a truth-teller: casting a lantern into the darkness of "postmodern neomarxism" (a term he uses pathologically, and without clear definition), and piercing the veil of political correctness.

It is little wonder, then, that Peterson is prominent among conservatives (he identifies as a "classical liberal," which is a conservative), angry young men, and the ranks of the alt-right. (Following her recent interview with Peterson, Channel 4 presenter Cathy Newman was deluged with death threats; thus giving Peterson the dubious distinction of being the rare "dangerous scholar" who is actually dangerous.) Peterson dresses up the language of misogyny in the woozy jargon of Eastern religion (he identifies chaos, his enemy, with the Taoist notion of the "eternal feminine"); he justifies existing structures of social dominance by deferring to the hard-wiring of ancient crustaceans; he capitalizes words such as Being and Woman and Nature with no apparent rationale. For all his wailing about the dangers of tyranny, Peterson's use of language is itself spookily Orwellian justifying the most noxious, moronic ideas by making them seem intellectual or, in his words, "archetypal."

Such apparent tension may constitute yet another paradox. But where contradiction can often prove edifying as in the Hegelian dialectic, in which ideas are refined through their conflict with one another Peterson's various paradoxes are unreconcilable, and empty. In a recent interview with the CBC's Wendy Mesley, Peterson was asked how he sees himself: as Marshall McLuhan or Billy Graham. With a characteristic smirk he responded: "Billy McLuhan."


[continued, yet again, in next post]
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicGlobe and Mail had a really good article about Jordan Peterson
averagejoel
02/01/18 7:51:26 PM
#1
If his popular Twitter account is to be believed, on the morning of Jan. 9, 2018, Dr. Jordan B. Peterson woke up, opened his laptop and immediately Googled the word "bikini." Then, he opened another tab and, using Microsoft's Google-rival search engine Bing, executed a new query, also for the word "bikini."

Peterson arrived at the conclusion that the difference between Google's and Bing's respective results of bikini photos revealed the former's apparent desire "to shape our perceptions themselves in the politically correct manner." Here is the defining image of Jordan B. Peterson, the menacing academic rock star and father figure: staring daggers at digital photos of bikinis to lay bare the tyranny of political correctness.

Google (or Bing) "Jordan Peterson" today and you'll find a bestselling author, whose new pop-psychology, self-help tome 12 Rules for Life is making its debut at No. 1 on The Globe and Mail's non-fiction bestseller list and is already topping the Amazon.com non-fiction list, edging out Michael Wolff's trashy Trump tell-all, Fire and Fury. That any university prof, let alone a Canadian, should achieve such popularity is frankly unfathomable. How can such an absurd figure be taken so seriously? It is, as with most things about Peterson, a paradox.

Read more: How U of T's Jordan Peterson has made money from online notoriety

Jordan Peterson is a tangle of contradictions, inconsistencies, and seeming improbabilities: a famous academic; a middle-aged man with a spookily intuitive mastery of the vicissitudes of social media; a Christian in the thrall of Nietzsche; a self-styled individualist free-thinker who calls for the mass sackings of fellow academics; a wholly unimposing specimen who insists on the moral necessity of physical strength and bemoans the social taboo against becoming physically violent with "crazy women."

Peterson's lectures, YouTube videos, and new book contain wisdom that ranges from the incendiary (that sexual assault is a consequence of the decline of traditional marriage), to the obvious (skateboarding is cool), to the vacuously pithy ("Start to stop doing what you know to be wrong"), and utterly ponderous ("cats are a manifestation of nature, of Being, in an almost pure form"). He has been called a "dangerous scholar" (the Chronicle of Higher Education), "Canada's newest intellectual star" (the National Post), "YouTube's new father figure" (the National Review), and, in an acerbic turn that cuts to the heart of the Peterson Paradox, as "the stupid man's smart person" (Tabatha Southey in Maclean's).

Unlike other thinkers historically vaunted in conservative circles, from Francis Fukuyama back to Allan Bloom and William F. Buckley, Peterson seemingly arrived out of the blue. This dark horse quality accounts, in no small part, for the cultural phenomenon that is Jordan Peterson. Through social media, he has circumvented the traditional pathway to academic and intellectual prominence. He speaks directly to an audience that has found him: his 703,000 YouTube subscribers, 394,000 Twitter followers, and thousands of Patreon contributing to upward of $62,000 monthly he rakes in crowdfunding his mission to "take the humanities back from the corrupt postmodernists."


[continued in next post]
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicITT: We put aside our political differences and have a nice chat about our weeks
averagejoel
02/01/18 7:44:08 PM
#5
I started a new job in a different city, and I have some temporary living accommodations taken care of. currently in the process of moving there. I worked 3 days this week. it's great
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicIs it ethical to cure people who aren't neurotypical?
averagejoel
02/01/18 7:36:14 PM
#57
Esrac posted...
I have a young daughter with autism. She attends ABA therapy five days a week.

If I could just cure her autism outright, instead of years of therapy, I would without a second thought.

ABA is legitimately damaging and traumatizing to autistic children. if you care about her, get her out of there
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicITT: I explain the basics of socialism
averagejoel
02/01/18 11:46:07 AM
#158
yeah I'm sorry. I've been really busy and haven't had much time for long thought-out posts
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicMy friend just came out as transgendered
averagejoel
02/01/18 9:18:08 AM
#72
COVxy posted...
This type of "this tiny slight change in the word is offensive, use this other completely arbitrarily picked word" word policing is silly and counterproductive. It adds nothing to the conversation, and you're only using it to discredit.

it's a pretty clear indication that you're uninformed on these issues
---
peanut butter and dick
TopicI am 100% for gender equality and stuff, but...
averagejoel
02/01/18 9:10:23 AM
#15
scar the 1 posted...
darkjedilink posted...
Okay, how about this - do you believe that it's entirely possible for an entire awards show night to ONLY award women?

Possible? I'm not really sure where you're going with this. I can clarify my stance if you want:
Art in general has been shaped by men throughout history. So much so that entire disciplines of art have been considered "lesser" because they're primarily done by women (reduced to craft that one does in the home). This is quite natural since men have been the ones evaluating art, as well as the ones doing the art. So it's become somewhat of a feedback loop, and resulted in a skewed sense of what "art", or "quality" means. So just as it might sound perfectly reasonable that only men get awards because they happened to be the best this year, we have to remember that the standards with which we assess art (or music, in this case) aren't infallible. They come from norms and traditions deeply rooted in history. See the feedback loop I'm trying to describe? I'm not great at explaining this, especially not in a second language. So what this can lead to is an opinion that awards such as the Oscars or the Grammys or whatever are not just evaluating the works according to some intangible standards, they are also part of implicitly defining those standards.

Mind you, this is not necessarily a feminist argument. It's along the same lines with e.g., people of color and the Oscars. All in all I think it's important that to have any sort of discussion like this the parties first need to agree with the purpose and function of awards. I hope I made myself clear, not trying to say you're wrong or anything.

this is absolutely correct, but I would like to add that novels were initially looked down on in this way (largely because many of the people who wrote them were women) and now they're probably the most popular form of literature
---
peanut butter and dick
Board List
Page List: 1 ... 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 56