Lurker > red13n

In

Los Angeles

also going to say my intuition this game was really on point.

If Kanz would have just actually tried I could have used my shot somewhere useful.

Cody11533 posted...

The No Lynch at the end of Day 1 was really, really bad, especially in hindsight lol. I can't speak for everyone on my team, but I had it in my head that keeping SBell alive at any cost would allow us to Night Kill and then Day Vig immediately at the start of Day 2, completely forgetting Town still had too many shots left at that point for that to work

There is literally 0 reason to ever no lynch in an all day-vigi game. The only thing you are doing is potentially opening up a kill for scum.

I would be inclined to kill the C's.

Also laugh if my instincts were correct and Crescent actually is trigger happy but just isn't because scum.

We're secretly playing some sort of last man standing game and there are no scum.

Or something.

Also none of the things involving that are actually particularly personal(In fact, I can't actually explain them myself). It is more I'd rather keep personal stuff as out of the game I can. Just couldn't quite explain the change in me without mentioning that.

PunishedBen posted...

Anyway, Red doesn't have to be scum, but damn is he standing out as completely different than I ever see him. Is that his brain on day vig? Is that what happens when he skips a game, like the Call of Duty cycle?

I don't want to get too personal, but I've been feeling kind of shitty for a couple years and I've crawled out of that funk and am feeling pretty good atm. Maybe temporary but just been in a different mood for a few days.

##vote: Scare

Scare should know better. Peaf was town making bad reads on me and Scare wouldn't make that dumb ashot as town.

Sorry I had D&D and got distracted.
##Dayvig: Kanz

stop

Peace___Frog posted...

Any specific comments on his shot, its outcomes, and what that does to your assessment of him?

Small scum lean.

Because I enjoy pressure and how people react.

I also have a general idea in my head of who could have immediately snapped off what timezone I am in and if I thought about it I might be able to guess who would have fed you info in scum chat vs in public. Was just food for thought while walking I haven't thought in depth but there was a reason I left the time zone vague.

If you'd like to apply for an hour long extension before I shoot you, I might consider it. But no more than that. Failure to accept this generous offer will mean I will just shoot you.

I'm not looking for an apology. I want you to play the game with a sense of urgency.

I repeat. I will kill you.

Kanz. I don't joke around.

You were idle an unusual amount of time.

I will kill you.

sbell scumdar increasing.

I suppose, the better way I was trying to put it. That role is more Ben than spirit of the game.

Wacky is fun. That is just Ben having fun at the expense of us.

The role is fake, death.

JC has town energy I think.

Peace___Frog posted...

Snap judgments that evaluate a group of people based on preconceived notions cannot possibly be made by someone who is scum because we know that they are perfect robotic players that do not have feelings. Got it.

I don't think anyone said this. It does seem extra salty for you though.

Crescent-Moon posted...

t's more he's putting a lot of words and thoughts into your post that I don't feel like were there in the slightest.

They were in fact not. My post extended to a cursory glance at the player list and then a snap decision as to who I think would be most likely to shoot on a whim.

Peace___Frog posted...

Red has a good enough read on them each after one game to say that Crescent is more likely than them both to shoot feels either cocky or scummy. I'm choosing the latter right now.
Not complicated.

lol Peaf you are funny when you try to think you know my head.

Kirby321 posted...

You uh... do know what game you signed up for, right?

I mean, I agree such a role should never make a reappearance, but like... that's kind of a given. This setup is deliberately unbalanced, from what I understand. So expect MADdening roles.

No kirby I signed up completely not knowing what I was getting into.

Cody11533 posted...

Did you see how bad my first game went? The only thing I did day 1 was ask questions? It's a low bar to clear.

Doesn't mean your post says anything from a town perspective in the slightest.

If Ben is a real role we are banning this role in the future. I don't buy it either.

Like, if theres a hesitant "i sat and struggled to make an intro post because I'm scared scum" that is it.

Cody11533 posted...

Hey everyone, I'm so mad to be here? My goal for this game is to be less overwhelmed and do better at keeping up on day 1!

Ahh this dude is probably scum.

Wow thats a low bar sad times.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Sure lets go full friend game truce?

ScareChan posted...

I like this one

Are we going to get real trying scare or scare that just posts likes to other peoples posts and then contributes little?

EDumey posted...

If we were all dayvigs, then who on this player list would have the itchiest trigger finger?

Crescent, 100%.

EDumey posted...

You're obviously a day vig, so you should shoot Lea, for no particular reason.

So either Ulti actually is scum day vigi or Ulti and Dumey are not scum together.

Good note. Please don't forget this.

Oh cool Ulti's said so much he should claim imo.

Oh cool someone already asked the werewolf question.

_Blur_ posted...

Like I'm vastly better at flirting with hot strangers sleep-deprived, hah.

Hah seriously I could see it. I was talking to friends last night and my brain definitely had several switches that were usually switched to "off" completely in the "on" position.

Chaeix posted...

its possible to have exhausted mania, where you feel euphoric, but it isnt necessarily a good thing because it can make it harder to sleep and can make you delirious. Hopefully you can get some sleep in the next few days buddy.

I slept fantastic lol.

I definitely miss the sense of euphoria though.

No.

Los Angeles, CA

I literally had two nights of just the worst insomnia. The first I ended up sleeping pretty well because my cat came in and forced me to sleep by not letting me move(I cant bother my pets when they curl up and want to sleep next to me, so its just forced body shut down).

Second night I just couldn't sleep at all. No explainable reason. Wasn't even really feeling bad or anything. Just no sleep happening. Got something like less than an hour and a half.

Theoretically, I should have felt like shit. I don't get it. Woke up today feeling pretty good. Tired in the morning, but as I woke up I was just randomly, I don't know, happy? I don't get it. Like my brain decided to work completely fucking backwards and as the day went on I somehow felt like I was getting into an even better mental state. And it continued to pretty much right now. Where I'm kind of tired but my brain feels wired on happiness. For no real reason that I can explain.

I don't want to recreate this by not sleeping but also wow. I'm finally actually starting to feel tired so maybe I'll crash but what a weird fucking day.

oh in for mafia

Thorn posted...

I do think it's easier for most European countries to protest because it's a smaller area so people are clustered together more. People are just spreadout a whole bunch here so it's way harder for anything approaching, say, a general strike to happen here.

But yeah it'd be nice if we would.

Nah we could fuck over our economy big with a few major cities. But our country is too entrenched in shitty ideals about capitalism. So many people are convinced those above them are looking out for them.

SirChris posted...

Biscuit was 100% arguing that police unions should not be conflated with labor unions and was right to draw that distinction.

Absolutely, but he didn't draw the line at that. He would not back down from a position of "unions should not be able to do this". He had some positions where it was things he had no idea that unions actually did those things. It was "regular unions dont do -insert things regular unions do- so police arent real unions" arguments mixed up in there.

StealThisSheen posted... EDIT: Maybe others took Biscuit's anti-police union rhetoric and used it to argue against unions in general? I don't actually remember such a thing coming from Biscuit himself, he seemed aggressively anti-police union and pro traditional labor union.

Little of A little of B. He knew how police unions operated. But took things as "this is bad because police unions do it" when in fact it was pretty typical union stuff. Lot of "unions shouldn't be able to do this" but it was stuff that unions -should- be able to do. One of the big one was endorsing political candidates and other election stuff. And I cant stress enough how important it is for unions to be able to endorse and have relationships with local political leaders. Those things pay off big when the unions want to be able to put pressure on a company without having to resort to a strike or other action(And also when they do).

The issue with police unions is essentially that they bargain with themselves and elect a lot of their own management.

A lot of the tertiary things biscuit was arguing against were things that real unions actually need to function. It was just pure anti-union rhetoric that is way too common(And often fed from management to curb union sentiment).

SirChris posted...

(I remember he was right against you and I am not particularly wanting to rehash this argument tbh)

Your memory is wrong.

masterplum posted...

Sometimes that organization is a union, especially if union membership is mandatory

Management will simply start hiring people outside the union.

This is particularly ignorant.

SirChris posted...

I remember Biscuit being actually 100% right on this issue and being vocal about it.

No, he wasn't. Biscuit was right on the problems about police unions while having 0 knowledge of what actual unions do(There was a lot of "unlike other unions police unions do -insert thing other unions actually do here-" thrown in)..