Lurker > Nemu

Nobody over 65 should be running in the first place, and even 65 is too old.

With Morb Day becoming a weekly federal holiday, seems unlikely.

I never finished it. I should give it another shot.

I feel like the movie would have been better had the father previously appeared in the MCU as an antagonist. His whole character arc is too rushed, so you don't get any real impact. The love interest is a jumbled mess of a plot line, especially where they have the lady who is good at driving suddenly take up bow and arrow out of nowhere instead of making her good at riding one of the mythical creatures of the land or something. The final antagonist is literally just a brainless beast with zero impact when they could have at least had it do something like take over the father's body as a conduit for speech.

chrono625 posted...

if you honestly think Im defending this crap maybe you need to start asking yourself that question.

refer to my original post - how the fuck do older mature individuals honestly find prepubescent children attractive. thats not a question of support, its a question of condemnation.

and as I said - there HAS to be a sick level of attraction involved if these people are willing to violate teens or kids.

Probably triggers the same areas of the brain that get people into incest fetishes. The idea of the taboo gets some people turned on, and these people are the extreme, disgusting end point of that. Theres definitely overlaps on the venn diagram with your standard pedo depending on the individual, but the idea of indulging in something taboo is probably the biggest factor.

If you want less dick pics, posting that you've received dick pics and are angry about it is almost certainly going to generate more dick pics. I don't think public shaming is going to change the mind of the kind of maladjusted troglodyte that would do such a thing in the first place.

Took about 3 minutes for 5 gigs on a random torrent just now.

God, the English voice acting is so bad.

No. Seems silly to do it when credit cards have a higher safety net, and you get rewards. Only reason to go full debit is if you're bad with money management, but anyone like that probably wouldn't be smart enough to do it.

I had fun with it as sort of a basic nostalgia trip and collectathon. It's not at all difficult unless you want to grind 150 Pokemon for the optional high level challenges, but that'd be more tedious than hard. If you want a good Pokemon game, I'd say no, but it's a good Pokemon experience.

As long as there's no time limit and you're not impaired, it's just a matter of how long.

Behold, Dragonborn, the most ancient of the Dragon Shouts, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim.

I got through the main story but dropped off on the epilogue level. Wasnt particularly fun compared to earlier levels. Didnt do too much of the other side stuff.

It's looking so far to maybe be a small step above S&S, but still 100 miles below where the franchise should be.

God, I definitely feel terrible for all kids with emotionally abusive parents like that. You can just tell from how she acts that she probably treats them all like shit. The father could just be trying in his own awkward way, but seems more like the kind of guy to do minor token gestures and think he's "being a parent."

Smackems posted...

Well what is it then

It's kind of like a roguelite for maybe the first three hours of gameplay. After you get enough stuff, then it's more of a normal upgrade to better stuff while slowly completing objectives kind of gameplay.

Kinda weird mishmash of a game that tries to be several things at once, doing none of them spectacularly well. It's not a bad one and done game, but it feels like it could have been a lot better. I'd say not worth full price, but certainly not a bad deal for like $10 or $20.

Cold any day of the week. Too hot will always feel terrible, while a t-shirt can suffice in the cold as long as it's not like -10.

Holy shit, I wish we had the infrastructure to care for all unwanted children because that woman needs all of her children taken away.

I'm fine cheating to skip extraordinarily tedious grinding in poorly optimized games. As long as the game is something I want to play, I otherwise won't cheat. If it's something that's enjoyable for the story but otherwise tedious to play, then I don't really care. I'll do what I need to do to finish it.

Other than a completely out of place, cataclysmic earthquake, none of the above.

It depends on the mechanics of the immortality. Do you gain an extended memory or will you just become a new person every few hundred years? Are you given perpetual youth or fully immortality? Can you ever kill yourself if needed?

Yeah, it's not bad, but calling it pizza is like calling a cake a muffin. It might be true in some weird twisting of words, but it's not the same thing.

Could just do something like a soft nuzlocke where you box them if they die, only able to take one out of purgatory whenever you pass particular milestone points you set for yourself.

Its probably all just mod bait. More planets means more spaces to mod means more longevity means more long term sales like Skyrim. Whether it will work is another question. I feel like any good will towards the Bethesda launch jank is dwindling as years and releases go by.

What? Automated driving as it is right now isn't foolproof, but it's still quite safe for a newer technology. It's only going to vastly improve over time, so the industry will definitely eventually begin to shrink over time.

For the most part, yes for someone who is already mostly happy. It's not a quick fix for major flaws in people/relationships and can possibly majorly exacerbate them depending on the circumstances.

I can't really think of many games where the evil options are particularly well fleshed out, but it's pretty fun when they actually feel well done. Though I find it's easier just to save, do them, and reload because they rarely lead to beneficial outcomes even if they might be fun.

Definitely complete bullshit. They should be able to hold something for maybe a week at maximum, and if they cannot directly correlate to a crime, it should be returned immediately. Also extraordinarily stupid in general to carry that much cash around but doesnt mean he shouldve had it taken away for no reason.

Don't people quickly get banned from return abuse? It's probably scaled to your overall yearly spending, but I think you only have a few times before they act.

Ultimately, seems like a pointless waste of money. There's no feasible way they could do that every time a tragedy happens, and this seems like a way to obscure all the shady shit going on with the police.

It's like it's a law that any half-decent Sonic game has to have some janky quality to it.

Yeah, it'd be annoying as hell, but the free time can allow me to adapt. Artificial hands also seem to be making leaps and bounds every few years, so it might only be another decade before you could purchase something that can work almost as well as the real thing.

Probably depends on how broadly you define it. Do you include every shitty mobile game and digital store shovelware? Or do you only count games published with some form of QC?

While it's still disgusting negligence, I can understand how a sleeping baby might be forgotten, but how the hell do you forget a fairly grown child?

At this point, you'd have to assume they were cheering on the shooter from the complete ineptitude on display.

Currently, just ketchup packets, but I could subside on the default food for that much money. I like eating, but I like having money more than that.

I hate the portmanteau, considering it could be one of seven days and there's no way to tell which one from the name alone. Nothing wrong with the holiday itself though.

It's also really annoying how they selectively apply it to individual creators while any music video or major corporation is fine. The fact that they haven't developed tiered advertising is nonsensical. You have all these channels that could provide good advertising platforms for advertising directly towards those demographics, but they paint themselves as family friendly only despite that not being at all the case.

The majority are probably mentally ill and/or addicts, so it kind of depends on how you define choose. You might need to literally institutionalize a good chunk of them to even get them to stay inside a facility, but we know our track record with that.

In general, making sure everyone has fair access to housing would be the actual right. If we're talking about just the current homeless population, I imagine a good majority of them would render their housing unlivable in a very short amount of time, if they even stay there.

I could get it if it was literally just shadowing to learn how things work, but it always sounds like these places put a bunch of shit on the backs of interns. It also seems rather silly because paying at least minimum wage likely would cost them next to nothing.