Lurker > IfGodCouldDie

DanChase posted...

It's not that hard to just follow the rules.

No longer an active member, must have been harder than he thought lol

FortuneCookie posted...

How long before they're purchased by Disney?

Marvel vs DC in the MCU

Mafia.

BlueCrystalTear posted...

I want people to let loose and have fun with it.

Those two are not compatible for mafia here lol

BlueCrystalTear posted...

Of course my next game is going to have insane roles and hopefully that'll be more fun for people.

Making insane roles is more fun for the host based on their idea of how the game should interact, rarely do the players make the plays that you think they should so just make sure you have some experienced give you feedback on them.

HanOfTheNekos posted...

The easy answer is make Scum kill compulsory

At mylo or all the time?

Peace___Frog posted...

2 cult teams, 1 small Mafia team, town is cop + vanillas + tracker

Mafia can kill every night, each cult team can kill once per game, and invite a member to the cult every night. Invite goes through as long as the target is not already in a cult, or Mafia. Win con for cults is majority + all scum eliminated. For town is to lynch cult leaders and Mafia. Cults start with one leader (and one follower?) And only the leader can invite, only followers can kill.

I had multiple drinks over lunch and am waiting for a haircut now so I'm not of sound mind.

I like it.

I did have a thought before Corrik died that the cop and doctor would be scum and/or the gf was town to essentially turn the game into an 8v2 vanilla fest because the roles would have been useless, which is why I was really disliking the setup meta from corrik because I knew there wasn't three scum but he was just so adamant about fear mongering 3 scum it was really throwing me off.

Username was BOOBS but spelt 80085

Crescent-Moon posted...

Isn't Suprak good at investigating those sorts of things

I think his specialty is finding who deleted posts or had posts deleted.

PunishedBen posted...

The goal here is to eliminate ties because we cant introduce the concept of ties into a mafia game as something either side can decide is worth more than losing. To some people its a win for everyone and for some people its a loss. Way too messy and undefined. So one side would need to win. I think its scum who deserves the win if they are in a situation where they dont feel the need to kill anyone in final 4. It is also playing towards their goal of hiding information from town. Town has to actually make the descion that ends the game and actually FIND the scum. It is against their win goal to refuse to find the scum

Its also against scum wincon not to obtain majority and they have the advantage of information. You're just awarding the team with the advantage the win because you don't want to hurt feelings which would inevitably hurt more feelings.

PunishedBen posted...

2. Stalemate results in scum win. If there's no power or threatening player alive at end game, scum simply has no inventive to night kill and is playing to win by doing so. Town is not playing to win by refusing to come to a decision that will win the game.

Fuck that shit. Scum should not be given an extra advantage for cowardice.

masterplum posted...

So I want to make a post about the no kill situation

No killing at 4 is fairly standard, and the backlash to it was somewhat surprising. I was late to No lynch so being the only person not no lynching I was in a bind.

* IGCD would never kill there. All it would do is make it easier to die
* Sbell and Kirby can't be scum. If they were scum they would have just joined me on IGCD

So the only thing I could do was no kill and argue that IGCD was playing for the tie. It was the only real option. Killing anyone at that point would completely dismantle the argument and make me look like scum.

And it ended up convincing Kirby, so there you go

Uh, the only time I ever consider a no kill is if we've janitored the doctor and can claim we saved one of our own. I absolutely kill you or sbell there and argue that Kirby must be scum because him being the only "confirmed" town and not dying gives me a much better chance than being against you and sbell in a final 3.

I'll also point out I was the only one correct about town being the ones that wanted a no lynch and that the scum team was scared and plum was getting desperate to lynch me there

Kirby made no sense to switch from no kill and plum is a fucking coward of a scum player good to know for future games

You're honestly the only one I thought had any chance of not being dumb

Good fucking job guys

I was town vanilla

Actually you know what fuck it. You guys don't want scum to lose you don't deserve to win either. I'm sick of no one listening or conversing with me.

##Unvote
##Vote: IGCD

Kirby321 posted...

Well, let's make things interesting.

Honestly, I'm starting to be convinced IGCD is our scum after all. This is starting to look desperate, and by now, a scum Sbell or Plum could easily set up IGCD for the mislynch and win the game. No Kill here just doesn't make sense.

God, I hope we're not wrong here.

##Vote: IGCD

Let's actually bring this to an end ffs
I know I was advocating for the No Lynch the entire time, but scum refusing to kill, even if it's a valid tactic, is cowardice here.

It is fucking cowardice and your going to give them the win for it. Vote no lynch. Can you explain why you think I'm looking desperate but plum isn't?

Those are the only cowboy boots I'd wear.

masterplum posted...

Ok I am really going to bed right now, but I am infuriated that IGCD thinks I am scum and instead of voting me is voting no lynch because he knows he can't win that fight and you are letting him get away with it.

No, again a misrepresenting of what I've said and done, I've left it for sbell and Kirby to decide, thats why I am not going to be the first to vote someone. If I am scum I am making sure i have permission instead of strongarming it the way you are trying to do to me.

masterplum posted...

Because you, Kirby and I all could have shrugged and killed someone

If IGCD did that he would get insta murdered the next day in final 3

If you or sbell was killed and Kirby is scum he would have had a much bigger problem explaining why the one player that was lock town was not killed going into final 3. This is a part of the reason plum is starting to lean scum on me. Everything single thing he has said about me this game has either been grossly misrepresented, straight up untrue or a complete non-answer.

masterplum posted...

I mean by lynching you.

He would have had to kill someone to get to the final 3 leaving him as a much bigger suspect.

masterplum posted...

Kirby would have just killed you

That makes no fucking sense to kill the guy everyone wants to lynch.

masterplum posted...

I'm going to bed, but the only option that makes sense is IGCD knows he can't win

Sbell, Kirby and I all leaning scum on him going to the final day. After the first no lynch any of us could have killed anyone else and won. None of us would no kill 3 times.

I am not looking forward to the peanut gallery laughing that we threw the game away

I've also pointed out why Kirby no killing makes sense as well and you haven't even acknowledged the argument. You haven't responded to anything I've even presented you.

Sbell, Kirby, plum seems like the only non-town aligned player with these actions it is starting to come across as desperate. He is starting to realize that he could have in fact won had he just not been such a fucking cowardly scum and killed someone on the first night. I'll probably regret this, but if you guys want to vote him first ill hammer or we can just stalemate and laugh at him regardless at end game. Either way I won't move my vote until you guys decide what you want to do.

So vote no lynch hurry this up, scum has a single coward left.

ok scum doesn't want to win thats fine by me, at least going forward we can call them cowardly for refusing to make the kill

##Vote: No Lynch

masterplum posted...

Well this was a waste of time

Blame scum whoever it ends up being and hold a grudge for all eternity.

masterplum posted...

I have. A lot.

You haven't though. You've been very vague, nothing you've said has any merit because you can't explain what the scum equity in any of my actions have been, its just all been I find IGCD doing this to be suspicious and that makes him scum.

I've explained how no killing doesn't help me as scum and I've pointed out who the only person no killing makes sense for as scum. If Sbell or Plum are scum there is literally no point in no killing, I was a lock for being insta lynched on the last day. I personally don't agree with you being host confirmed town as everyone seemed to accept because of Corriks stupidity.

You have at no point explained why you think I'm scum.

##Vote: No Lynch

stop being a pussy and kill one of us

Bishop9800 posted...

True. I used to get Madden religiously every year. But now it's just like the same game each time. I wish 2K could make another football game, but EA put a stop to that.

Yeah I went from buying yearly releases to getting them every two years and now I haven't bought one in like 4 years

Wow a girl on the cover, what woke garbage, ill never play a sports game again, etc. etc.

Now that, that's out of the way.

What an odd choice for the pictures. I could have seen pics like that for like an EA Sports big game but for the actual game its a little weird.

Glob posted...

It depends how active you are. If youre doing strenuous exercise, you need to shower afterwards.

But no, you shouldnt shampoo everyday. Thats really bad for your hair.

And soap is just as bad for your skin, which is why you shouldn't be using soap everyday and your showers shouldn't be hot either because hot water is bad for the skin.

If I'm your biggest scum suspect than keep going for no lynch and ill throw my vote down first every day.

IfGodCouldDie posted...

Kirby "confirmed" town based on play from the game wasn't killed because he could be scum.

I don't know why I put day there.

Ok, so right now this is what I have for everyone.

Kirby "confirmed" town based on day, wasn't killed because he could be scum.

Sbell I've liked all game and don't believe I've seen anything I should be suspicious of, but his aversion to wanting to no lynch and forcing scums hand doesn't sit well with me.

Plum I havent really had much issue just his weak attacks on me, but I don't really see him leaving Kirby alive because I would have been an instant lock for lynch vs the other two so this situation just makes life harder on him if he is scum.

Well if you truly feel I'm still scum vote for me.

Obellisk posted...

I mean if we all choose no lynch we are essentially saying this game should be a no contest game, should end and we should all pretend it didn't exist.

Is that what we want instead of giving either faction the satisfaction?

No. If we choose to no lynch and cause a stalemate we are saying scum sucks so much with the extra advantages they had that they still couldn't win against town.

masterplum posted...

Where are you going with this?

No where really I guess. I just would find it very odd that either of you no killed Kirby when I was pretty much a lock to be insta lynched in a final 3 with both of you.

So this is my thought pattern on the situation right now.

ScumPlum has no reason to leave Kirby alive.
ScumBell has no reason to leave Kirby alive.
ScumGod maybe leaves Kirby alive because he hopes that three people that have been wishywashy on him all game decide to vote differently
ScumKirby can't kill himself.

I will say this much, the no kill really leads me to believe it is Kirby, because if it was Sbell or Plum they easily mislynch me to win the game. I know this also make me look bad because of fear they auto lynch me which is why I am down to stalemate just so scum doesn't win.

And just to prove it.

##Vote: No Lynch

if all think I'm scum let's end the game.

masterplum posted...

Lylo rule is lame because I want to vote no lynch but my guess is that isnt going to gain traction and its just going to be awkward with a frozen vote on no lynch

Going to do a full reread of Sbell before Im committal but I dont think much has changed other than I am super confused what was going through sultans head. I still dont understand that Sbell vote of his.

I am 100% willing to draw by forcing scum to kill.

BlueTigerLion posted...

Yea. I heard someone compare Andrew Tate's good takes to Jordan Peterson's clean your room. But when you dig deeper you hear some bad takes.

Its not even digging deeper it more like wiping the dust off.

NoMeLx22x posted...

Please state them.

The good takes are probably the underlying bullshit of better yourself, be better, and make yourself better. That all these stupid alt-right grifters start their base with.

Guide posted...

Is it really all that different if you get the same results as the former option?

I would say so. Two people meeting and clicking is definitely different than an older person specifically seeking out freshly 18-19 year olds because they are 18-19