Lurker > Tyranthraxus

electricbugs2 posted...

Difference is higher octanes actually have an effect on my car. Have serious doubts TC is in the same position.

No they don't. Look in your driver's manual and it will tell you what octane you require.

saspa posted...

I've tried to read up on and understand the octane rating but I still have no idea what it is in relation to a car

Engines use a kind of bicycle pedal looking contraption to pump cylinders. When one goes up the other goes down. The speed at which this happens is regulated by the octane of the fuel based on the engine specifications. In order to actually work as intended, the engine expects a specific octane of fuel. If you don't get it, you get what's called a misfire which is where two cylinders try to go up at the same time. If this happens too often your engine breaks.

Read the driver's manual of your car to figure out what octane you need and use only that octane.

BuckVanHammer posted...

if you really want to maximize go diesel bro

Diesel is like octane 23 or something like that and you will definitely fuck up your engine with misfires unless it's a diesel engine.

Your driver's manual for your car tells you what grade of fuel you need to use. Use that and only that ever.

After Dislyte's Monkeygate they decided to apologize by giving away one 10-pull (900 for a pity) and issue a statement that basically says "lol shut up"

They were tipped off and ignored it.

DarkRoast posted...

I watched the trial and, at least to me, it was crystal clear that they had an exceptionally malignant relationship and that Amber Heard was, if nothing else, at least as belligerent as Depp, if not more so.

I wouldn't be surprised if Depp was abusive. The shit Heard did was pretty damn abusive, too.

Regardless of any abusive behavior Depp may have done, it seems clear that he did not do most of the things Heard said he did like chokeslam her through a glass table or rape her with a wine bottle or write threatening messages on the wall in his blood.

Religion

kurdt032 posted...

That's great but let's not pretend he is some stand up innocent guy.

He is, at the very least, innocent of what amber accused him of.

PowerOats posted...

honestly 3 good trailers is all I want.

Sony never disappoints on trailers.

Actual games, if they ever come out, that's a different story.

PowerOats posted...

I'm predicting

3 mins decent start
7 mins of indie games of various quality
5 mins of surprise/ good announcement
15 mins of VR talk
Final being something highly anticipated

Yea that's over 30 mins, but they almost never stop right at 30 anyways

They've usually stopped early. These have been pretty short compared to Nintendo directs

kurdt032 posted...

In what world does he deserve to be defended or 'celebrated'? He's a dick.

Just because he's a dick doesn't make it okay to abuse him and lie about it later.

PS4 is dead apparently.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Why are they releasing new hardware when there's still not enough of the old hardware? What kind of attach rates are they honestly expecting for a piece of shit like this.

billcom6 posted...

Imagine thinking you know what actually happened in an abusive relationship because you looked at some memes and some clips of civil trial on twitter.

Figuring that out was literally the point of the trial.

We figured out Amber is an abusive shitbed

NeonOctopus posted...

Toadsworth was never in Mario Kart tho, and Toadette is a chick, so there's only one left >_>

He was just only in the awards ceremonies.

Flauros posted...

Has Jim Carrey made a public apology about the problematic nature of the film?

Jim didn't write the script.

NeonOctopus posted...

She could've described it using a much worse Mario Kart character like Yoshi or Daisy instead.

I'm pretty sure she meant toadsworth.

She never said the name after all, just "the mushroom guy from Mario kart"

voldothegr8 posted...

This is a strange one

Eh. It's just legal bullshit.

Clams, prawns, crabs, etc aren't fish either but probably covered under this law in some capacity.

The only thing weird here is that a bee isn't even aquatic.

I4NRulez posted...

i mean she had sex with him on more than one occasion so its like how low are her standards?

She was paid for it. It's not about standards.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Lynda Carter didn't say Lynda Carter was a trans icon

nicklebro posted...

No you wouldn't. You could just let it go to the jury

Going to the jury is literally the opposite of not responding.

Not bother reading the rest of your garbage.

nicklebro posted...

I don't, unless I'm claiming that statement was defamatory. If I'm claiming that statement was defamatory, it's on me to prove it. AGAIN it's quite literally on the clip I keep telling you to listen to. It's not up for debate, it literally never was. You think you can file a defamation claim and collect money from someone while having no obligations to prove your allegation?I can just file a million defamation claims and forever the other side to do all the work, or else they have to pay me?

Please stop, just think about it for a second.

The other side would have to respond or else you win in default judgment yes.

Even if your claims are completely meritless I would still have to file a motion to dismiss.

Edit: and filing obvious bullshit like you just described opens yourself up to counter suits for my attorney fees.

nicklebro posted...

Burden is on Amber, it's in the clip I posted. First words after the quote is "has ms heard proved all the elements of defamation"

It's been clear cut throughout the whole trial, this is not something that I am unsure of. Plus it's common sense, If you declare something is defamatory, it's on you to prove it, not the other party to disprove your allegations.

Why should you have to do anything in court if I say you faked a call to the police.

radical rhino posted...

The fuck is that

God of laziness

DrizztLink posted...

I think that's backwards (Johnny filed this specific claim, she countered it) but I'm not 100%>

Amber made the claim it was defamation, Johnny's team never filed that as a claim they only said it on a publication.

nicklebro posted...

Where did Amber's team prove that? I thought they all acknowledged there was a second call...

Again it would have to be "proof there was no second call," not "no evidence of a second call, " because the onus is on heard's team

Depp's team is the one who made the claim there was a hoax. They had to prove it.

Veggeta_MAX posted...

Pot of Greed. So many other great YGO memes out there but yall gotta pick this most dumbest one to go viral.

Never heard of this one. What does it do?

Whatever the front page of r/me_irl is

This is it.

Years after harassing this dude with zero evidence we have finally uncovered that he was a jerk to coworkers and asked a few questions about teens' lives & activities.

We got him.

nicklebro posted...

So Johnny was the one that tore the place up? As he was abusing Amber and gave her a bruise? Um That doesn't make sense broski. Obviously I know the quote, and I know something must be untrue about it, but don't just tell me the whole thing was false cuz I know that's not true. There had to be one specific part that wasn't totally true. Doesn't seem like anyone knows.

No. The statement is about what she told the police, not what actually happened. They lied in their claim about what Amber told the police.

nicklebro posted...

What's WRT mean?

With regard to.

nicklebro posted...

And what things "actually happened"? Specifically, in his lawyers quote, what part did he get wrong? You can hear the quote in the link I posted above, it starts at 7:46. Which part was untrue?

She called the police and didn't lie about anything when they got there. The attorneys called it a hoax. It wasn't. All that stuff actually happened.

Interstella5555 posted...

I don't think you realize how little money that is.

There are furries who would happily pay that money to make this happen.

Depp's attorneys said she lied about calling the cops / lied WRT the story she gave the cops except those things actually happened.

Ruvan22 posted...

What did she say?

Usual "punishment from God because gay people" stuff

How many times can I agree to this deal

pegusus123456 posted...

That would have happened relatively recently though. Either way, her being a queer icon makes sense, I just don't see the trans thing.

WW Earth One was published 6 years ago. There's been a lot of subtext prior to that.

gunplagirl posted...

You do know trans icon doesn't necessitate someone being trans, right? It's like how Cher and Madonna are drag icons.

While true I always think it's a little weird people still consider "I will survive" a gay anthem after what Gloria Gaynor said about AIDS.

The introduction / title screen of Syndicate was the first time I really felt like "wow" and IMO it still holds up as a fucking amazing cutscene today.

https://youtu.be/cM0d7VGFNsY

No. Someone like that is probably loaded with other mental issues.

Kloe_Rinz posted...

sounds like you have no clue what you're talking about

also, hows the idle life for those androids? the samsungs last like a day or two tops in idle but an iphone can last longer than a week

I'm using #7 on the list. I haven't tested to see how long it could go idle but if I unplug it at 100% and then go to sleep I wake up and it still has more than 90% power left

I like boost. Don't see what the big issue is.

YugiNoob posted...

Oh I didnt even realize Diablo Immortal was out lol. But Im guessing that the crowd here is more into hero collectors? I tried Diablo 3 on the PS4 and it was a bit too grindy :<

Diablo Immortal strictly speaking isn't a gacha. All purchases are deterministic.

SomeLikeItHoth posted...

I didnt know it was out already.

It was released a little ahead of schedule.

Kloe_Rinz posted...

Its not a reskin. Its an extremely simplified copy of it. With pay 2 win added

Lol what can you buy that's pay to win?

WingsOfGood posted...

Amber's reply from someone retweeting it

https://twitter.com/_bigmanbernardo/status/1532095284725039105

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/7/0/9/AAefUOAADSn1.jpg

Remember if you're a shit bag and people call you out on being a shit bag just scream "FREEZE PEACH" as loud as you can, and then they can do nothing.

MistyFan462 posted...

Yuck why

Y'all should try it before blindly hating on it. They literally threw out the old game whatever TF it was and made a new one.

Baha05 posted...

Do you even have a phone?

It was released early on phone so anyone playing it now is on a phone.

Touch posted...

Tell me how it is

Surprisingly good so far. No gacha / loot boxes and no P2W.

Everything is basically a cosmetic. The only thing you can buy that actually affects the game itself is a doohickey that increases the difficulty of a rift.

Smashingpmkns posted...

Isn't this the one that is just a reskin of an already existing game

CRON posted...

Yes

No. It was completely overhauled and it's basically a Diablo 3 port at this point.

Darkinsanity1 posted...

Ugh I want to play because I love Diablo but mobile games and I don't play well together. Or rather we play too well, f2p pace just doesn't cut it and I inevitably spend money, a lot of money on these games once I get addicted.

There's no loot boxes/fake gambling if that's your concern.

WingsOfGood posted...

correct

and the Sun could hide behind "but Amber said it so we could reasonably believe it"

Yeah. The Sun essentially stole the story from the Washington post. If Amber had published it in The Sun herself it might have gone differently.

AlCalavicci posted...

For that $2mil, is that awarded to Heard (subtracted from Depp's winnings) or was that also to Depp?

It was also awarded to Depp because she failed to prove all the elements of defamation.

If my math is right, it sounds like she has to pay 17 million dollars.