The problem I had was the one dungeon where you have to... But you can see the path from the adjascent room.find a secret pathway randomly hidden in a waterfall
With how much Abyss keeps getting passed over, they must have great plans for that one.Pleeeeeeeeeeease... ;_;
Hard times create strong monkeysNah, they usually just end up dead or traumatized, and being traumatized does not make you strong, lol.
That low, huh?What are you talking about? Cats are closer to the gods than us and they know it, lol. Well... some of them know it. XD
Oh, they did worse than that. They forced Rosemary Kennedy to have a lobotomy, literally cutting out a chunk of her brain. The procedure left her with the mental capacity of a 2 year old. She was 23 at the time, and she lived to the age of 86.Yeah. Karma sent brain worms to the wrong Kennedy; they should have gone to her parents.
There is something seriously wrong with that guy. The whole dead bear in Central Park thing was just messed up.He's a Kennedy, of course there's something wrong with him. The whole family has a lot of problems. Parents locked away disabled family members and hid their existence from others, the two assassinated ones had a ton of personal baggage in addition to... being assassinated. Just sad, really. I can see how coming from a family like that could make a person exceptionally paranoid/prone to conspiracism, but that doesn't excuse the harm he's done:
In the piece, Kennedy relied extensively on the work of Mark Geier, a doctor whose license to practice medicine was revoked by Maryland in 2011. Geier pushed the vaccine-autism link as a frequent expert witness. He also misrepresented his credentials and developed "a 'protocol' for treating autism that involved injecting children with the drug that is used to chemically castrate sex offenders at a cost of upwards of $70,000 per year.https://popular.info/p/the-pernicious-elite-obsession-with
Why do you automatically assume it's fake?It's a trauma response/defense mechanism, usually developed by people who have been on the receiving end of false apologies before.
Inaction isnt action and the fact that youre trying to argue that it is is ridiculousUh, no. This is actually a very old and well-understood concept.
If you don't act you are an observer of someone else's atrocity, if you do act you become a participant of the single person's murderNo. Inaction is in and of itself an action that one chooses. In the scenario you choose to either be responsible for 5 deaths or responsible for 1. People who try to weasel out of this are cowards; you are already a participant in the scenario. "I choose not to participate = I could have killed 1 person and saved 5, but I instead killed 5 people and saved 1."
The only reason I wouldn't pull it is if I somehow find the single person's life more important than the group's. It can be both objective or subjective. Subjective is if the single person is someone I love. Objective is if the group consists of dangerous criminals or terminally ill people, or the single person is doing great things for humanity.This is unfortunately where it gets muddled. There's lots of ways to complicate this, as the meme has demonstrated over the years, lol.
The correct answer is to not pull it. If you pull it you are at least partially to blame for the single person's death, if you don't pull it you share none of the blame.Inaction doesn't make you not culpable.
What do you mean then by spirituality? It seems to be very unscientific when I look for definitions of it. Some unseen power that connects everyone. And I think people liking the values of Christianity, but denying any existence of a god or heaven or anything like that doesn't make them Christian at all. That's like me saying I'm muslim, but I dont believe in muhammed or allah, I just like the traditions and think some teachings are good.Again, it sort of depends on your interpretation. I've met Christians who say that what it means to be Christian is to follow the teachings of Jesus, but that they don't see him as a divine entity (so they view him more like a spiritual leader like Siddhartha Gautama). This shouldn't surprise anyone; there are so many different interpretations of Christianity it'll make your head spin.
It is very interesting to hear some people say they are atheist but still religious and ascribing to Buddhism, for example as above. I'd never heard of that before.It's definitely less common in the Americas and Europe, I think.
Wait wait wait. I'm not super super familiar with the story of Adam and Eve, but didn't they already know about God as they had talked and could talk and ask stuff, and had been given instructions?Yes, but how could they make use of any of that? They had no knowledge that would give them context. They literally did not know what was right and wrong, that disobeying God was bad. God tells them they'll die if they eat the fruit, but they don't know what that even means. And the snake tells Eve God lied to them, how is she supposed to know the snake is lying? She doesn't know anything. It's like getting mad at a toddler for sticking doing something because their older sibling told them to do it.
I do not have the legal background required to determine sentence lengths. I have trust in the system to work most of the time and that when it did not, the other systems in place can correct for that.You're a fool. This guy was not let out because he changed. He was let out because his country wanted him to compete. You wanna see what rapists are like after this amount of time in prison?
They were both told in the beginning.They were both told not to do something, but they had know knowledge that disobeying that order was wrong. Do you see the problem?
Atheism is non religious, not solely about Gods. No atheist I know says they believe in ghosts and an afterlife and crystal vibes and auras, but just no creator lolBuddhism, Confucianism, Taoism, Jainism... I think there are some interpretations of Hinduism, and even some Christian sects that are atheistic. You're just wrong, dude. *shrug*
That's not how the law works. Break the law in a different country and say "well i just didn't know bro, so it's not my fault".It depends on one's interpretation, however, in this instance, the individuals in question were physically incapable of educating themselves, unlike people irl. In such a case, ignorance literally is an excuse; there was no way for them to know, and they were set up to fail. I'm not going to strike a dog for not obeying me when it couldn't really even conceive of why it should.
Philosophically, I personally see it as .... teaching humility.I agree. It is unfortunate that people try to interpret these stories so literally. Unfortunately, for many Christians, they feel they *must* because they think much of what Jesus did relies on "original sin" being an actual literal thing.
Boos continued to rain.I hope someone makes a compilation video.
The forbidden fruit was a test. But blaming Adam who didn't really know until afterwards is kind of a downer for us males otherwise we still be in the garden. Why should GOD tell us don't do that or this every time we are about to make a morally wrong choice? It is all right there in the 10 commandments.If you don't have knowledge that disobedience is bad, then you cannot be faulted for being disobedient. And faulting people for being deceived is shitty, too. This applies to both humans in the story, not just the "male."
These topics tend to be heavily and acceptingly pro atheism and how stupid or delusional Christians are though. It would be nice to hear from an atheist who stopped believeing in crystals or who was an ex muslim or who no longer believes in the 'ancient ancestral spirits', for a change. We never do though.Atheism is about GODS, not crystals or spirits. And ex-Muslims are pretty common, actually, I just don't know that any are on this particular board, but you'll find that a lot of their arguments will be similar to ex-Christians for rather obvious reasons.
Which Ray Comfort video is that?*shrug* been over a decades since I listened to that dishonest grifter. It's an argument he regularly used, but I couldn't tell you if he still does.
Christians are allowed to be offended in the same way that Muslims are allowed to be offended by anyone disrespecting their prophet.Yeah, if it's about them, sure. Too bad it's not.
I don't know, maybe you're right and it was not intended to reference anything Christian at all. And of course some go too far by spreading hatred and bigotry.But that's literally all this freakout is. By calling the characters in the performance demons, and calling the performance a satanic mockery of The Last Supper out of ignorance, that is an attack against the people who made and performed it. I have no respect for Christians who hate the gays more than they love their neighbor.
super nessSo that's where the Chaos Emeralds went.
To be clear, I wouldn't have known any of this without research. But that's exactly what makes me so mad about a lot of conservatives and their mouth-pieces. They don't care if they have even the slightest idea what they're talking about. They will just start blabbering and living out their victim-complex and will learn absolutly nothing from being proven wrong time and time again.This is the problem with ignorance. If you don't learn about anything beyond your own life, the only way you ever understand anything is to try and reframe it within the context of your own limited world view. If you don't know something as simple as "hey look at that weird headpiece that blue dude is wearing, I've seen stuff like that a lot in Greek mythology," but you do know that "demons exist, gay people bad, gay people and demons! DEMONS AND GAY PEOPLE! TABLES WITH PEOPLE ALONG THEM! MUST BE MOCKING JESUS! MUST BE!" well...
No Im johnny Knoxville welcome to jackassIn all seriousness, I've never watched them. I don't watch movies very much unless someone else invites me to watch with them. It's not that I dislike movies, but I don't feel much motivation to watch them on my own either.
Hi Im Johnny Knoxville and welcome to jackassI thought you were MICHALECOLE?