Killmonger. Like people wrongly claims that he just wanted to randomly off people. Now he expressly said he wanted to take out oppressors. To top that off he was the rightful king. He won that and had the blood. Then he is toppled by a western Coup the nation fall apart tlduebto bad leadership.Nah, Killmonger was just angry. He didn't actually care about doing right by anyone. His only motivation was vengeance. Nothing and no one mattered other than enacting vengeance for a life he felt he was owed. The second someone posed as an obstacle to that vengeance he eliminated them.
The American justice system failed Simon Phoenix and he was programmed to escape instead of being properly rehabilitated.
Whenever this discussion comes up, i think of General Hummel from The RockHe's mainly just naive since he didn't bother to check if all his accomplices were on the same page. Most people would just say "no" to holding a city for ransom. If you say "yes", you're probably willing to go through with it.
A lot of good ones listed already. At least ones who had a good point:Wondering which Kingsmen villain you mean. There isnt really a good way to interpret
Watchmen
Kingsmen
Im positive theres more, but theyre evading me.
Wondering which Kingsmen villain you mean. There isnt really a good way to interpretYoure right, there isnt. The good point was thatall middle/lower class people must die.
The final antagonist of Persona 5 Royal isn't a villain at all and definitely has good points.