No-
He's right.
Conservative or not. He wants to enjoy a screening of Wonder Woman which is allegedly the only good DCu movie since batman begins.
His reasoning is logical and based on anti discrimination. Exerting ones rights to fight discrimination is not trolling.
You want to call him an sjw fine maybe he is- but a troll, no?
He also shouldn't be making an issue of this.
Conner4REAL posted...
No-
He's right.
Conservative or not. He wants to enjoy a screening of Wonder Woman which is allegedly the only good DCu movie since batman begins.
His reasoning is logical and based on anti discrimination. Exerting ones rights to fight discrimination is not trolling.
You want to call him an sjw fine maybe he is- but a troll, no?
He also shouldn't be making an issue of this.
Did you even read the thing? He went there specially to troll them.
Ha
I found my new hero
lol please stop, you're killing me.
He's a real MLK.
The fact that he's writing about this ahead of time suggests he's trying to make a scene. If he really just wants to see the movie at that time, he could go, say at the door that he's a trans woman, and maybe write about it afterward.
People blasted and wrote "Some men lay down their lives battling white supremacists on the streets. Others demand admittance to the women only Wonder Woman screening" which was in reference to the 2 good Samaritans killed by a Nazi supporter in Portland.
the only good DCu movie since batman begins
If that's trolling then all the black people who went into restaurants to get thrown out during the civil rights movement were also trolling....
Conner4REAL posted...
If that's trolling then all the black people who went into restaurants to get thrown out during the civil rights movement were also trolling....
Those people werent going to places and doing that to annoy people, like this man is. They went there and did that for something much much greater than annoying people.
It isnt a fair comparison at all.
He pointed out it was legal to buy a ticket to a specific screening but it would be illegal to kick him out on grounds of sex or gender identity and said "They cannot remove me froma public place for my sex or gender. I plan on enjoying the film, Thanks"
Stephen also referred to the new film as "Chris Pine superhero movie" and ignoring the fact that this is the first comic book movie inspired by a woman since Elektra.
Do you think Stephen is a Troll? let's see what people think.
Stephen - Jerk
Conservative or not. He wants to enjoy a screening of Wonder Woman which is allegedly the only good DCu movie since batman begins.
Big flaw in his logic.
A movie theatre isn't a public place. So they can deny anyone they want. Women only is still an accepted discrimination, so nothing he can do about it.
SinisterSlay posted...
Big flaw in his logic.
A movie theatre isn't a public place. So they can deny anyone they want. Women only is still an accepted discrimination, so nothing he can do about it.
no it's not. any kind of discrimination based on race or gender is illegal.
they can't do shit and neither can you
No-
He's right.
Conservative or not. He wants to enjoy a screening of Wonder Woman which is allegedly the only good DCu movie since batman begins.
His reasoning is logical and based on anti discrimination. Exerting ones rights to fight discrimination is not trolling.
You want to call him an sjw fine maybe he is- but a troll, no?
He also shouldn't be making an issue of this.
Go to a bar on ladies night and ask for a cheap drink.
Go to a night club wearing a bra, see if you can get in.
Oh, and age discrimination is perfectly ok too.
https://www.google.ca/?gws_rd=ssl#q=50+condos
^^^Every single listing there is illegal. But no one says a thing.
"While in the United States discrimination in housing is generally prohibited, the Fair Housing Act of 1968[8] and the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995 (109 STAT. 787)[9] allow communities to restrict residency to older individuals. Individuals may buy into these properties regardless of age; however, the owner may be prohibited from occupying the property according to the association declarations and bylaws."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age-restricted_community
Yeah, that's from wikipedia, but I'm sure you can follow links to the sources.
They're not denying men service. They're just giving women a better price.
The_Beta_Male posted...
SinisterSlay posted...
Big flaw in his logic.
A movie theatre isn't a public place. So they can deny anyone they want. Women only is still an accepted discrimination, so nothing he can do about it.
no it's not. any kind of discrimination based on race or gender is illegal.
they can't do shit and neither can you
Go to a bar on ladies night and ask for a cheap drink.
Go to a night club wearing a bra, see if you can get in.
Discrimination against men is considered acceptable in todays society.
Oh, and age discrimination is perfectly ok too.
https://www.google.ca/?gws_rd=ssl#q=50+condos
^^^Every single listing there is illegal. But no one says a thing.
Oh and age and race discrimination? You can see that right on the government of Canada immigration website. Certain races and certain ages get higher priority for immigration. That's legal government run discrimination. It's all ok in todays world.
Stephen - Jerk
A movie theatre isn't a public place. So they can deny anyone they want. Women only is still an accepted discrimination, so nothing he can do about it.
countersue him
Actually, at least in the US, retirement communities have been deemed to be legal in the courts.
"While in the United States discrimination in housing is generally prohibited, the Fair Housing Act of 1968[8] and the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995 (109 STAT. 787)[9] allow communities to restrict residency to older individuals. Individuals may buy into these properties regardless of age; however, the owner may be prohibited from occupying the property according to the association declarations and bylaws."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age-restricted_community
Yeah, that's from wikipedia, but I'm sure you can follow links to the sources.